Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Алина Пеклецова

@pekletsova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,176subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002423085792
TypeChannel
Username@pekletsova
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pekletsova

Growth

3,1763,1783,1778 August 2026 — 3,178 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,178 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,176 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,176–3,178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:083,176-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:253,178no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:173,178first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 11 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,608 reactions across 8 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,43552.8%
👍93520.3%
🔥69615.1%
🎉1022.21%
❤‍🔥651.41%
😱440.955%
👏360.781%
🏆350.76%
🤝320.694%
💋250.543%
💘230.499%
🙏220.477%
💯200.434%
🎄190.412%
😢190.412%
🤔170.369%
👌150.326%
🎅90.195%
🤮80.174%
🙉70.152%
14 further kinds440.955%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,608reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Mar 2026, 07:10 UTC≈6,460 views563 reactionsread 8 August 2026

-Алло, подождите, без меня не начинайте! Примерно так я представляла, что буду звонить в Уфу вчера. В последнее время задержками рейсов никого не удивишь, но к тому, что я не смогу в нужный день вылететь на соревнования из-за того, что в Череповце сломался самолёт, я не была готова. Хоть и ситуацию удалось решить, но 3 невозвратных билета безнадежно потеряны, как и сутки моей жизни. А бежать гонку завтра, впервые уви

👍221151🔥72😱44😢19🏆18🤔17💯7

5 Mar 2026, 04:10 UTC≈8,690 views678 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Для всех самых неравнодушных болельщиков: •Нет, марафон на ЧР в Южно-Сахалинске я не бегу, потому что решили, что ещё рано, тем более в разгар сезона •С Сахалина я улетела сразу после скиатлона, чтобы было больше времени дома на акклиматизацию до следующих стартов • Следующие запланированные старты: Универсиада в Уфе Молодёжное первенство в Кирово-Чепецке ФКР в Кировске

387🔥134👍92🙏22🏆15👌9❤‍🔥6💘4

18 Jan 2026, 18:25 UTC≈12,500 views547 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @evgjikPhoto

Сегодня в тур поход Алина взяла меня с собой, точнее я напросилась. Больше с нами никто не захотел идти... Ехали в хорошей компании, друг другу не мешали. Осталось спросить Алину, хотела бы она, чтобы я вперёд выходила, ведь она никогда не ходит за кем-либо, вышла бы я вперёд – она меня по большому радиусу обгонять старалась бы.

304👍136❤‍🔥44🔥31🤝7💘6🤮6👎4

18 Jan 2026, 18:25 UTC≈15,100 views608 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сразу отвечу, что никаких претензий и вопросов к Жене у меня нет. И мне непонятно, почему сегодня на неё обрушилась какая-то волна хейта. Давайте оставим эмоции и обсудим факты: 1. Я свои поражения признавать умею и отговорки не ищу 2. В протоколе результатов напишут только итоговое место и проигрыш в секундах, а не кто какой тактики придерживался 3. Победеждает тот, кто сегодня был сильнее А если всё-таки углублятьс

320👍202🔥51🤝18💯9👏3👎1💘1

17 Jan 2026, 12:12 UTC≈39,200 views700 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всем доброго дня! Как обычно это бывает, стоит сказать одно слово журналистам и появляется ещё 100 вариантов додуманных кем-то продолжений. Так что хочется написать от первого источника: Да, в получении нейтрального статуса для участия в международных соревнованиях мне отказали, причина: несоответствие антидопинговым требованиям, то есть, потому, что я не сдавала ни одной допинг-пробы для WADA (Всемирного антидопинго

432👍192🔥28💋25👌6❤‍🔥53🤝3

31 Dec 2025, 17:56 UTC≈9,170 views572 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А что ещё нужно для счастья?❤️ Всех с наступающим!🎉 P.s: мой племянник и крестник

353🔥118👍56🎄19🎅9🎉6🤗4💘3

12 Dec 2025, 17:21 UTC≈10,100 views657 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо большое всем за поздравления сегодня! Успела выдохнуть, задув свечки на торте, а завтра снова на старт Да, уже 20, но некоторые комментаторы в вк почему то думают, что до сих пор 17 Отдельное спасибо сегодня заслуживает @Katysha_skier, как оператор, фотограф, организатор, представитель всей женской команды, создатель атмосферы и настроения

404🔥112🎉92👍29❤‍🔥8💘4🍓3🍾3

11 Dec 2025, 04:26 UTC≈9,440 views283 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @russia_4kaadPhoto

#ГЕРОЙ4KAAD : Алина Пеклецова 😎 Представляем вам интервью с восходящей звездой российских лыжных гонок, которая громко заявила о себе в новом сезоне Кубка России, выиграв золото всех стартов, в которых приняла участие! Алина Пеклецова поделилась с нами планами на сезон, подборкой любимых книг и своими жизненными принципами. Желаем Алине сохранить её «дерзкий» настрой и победную поступь на предстоящих стартах! С нет

🔥15084👏31👍7🎉4❤‍🔥2🏆2💘1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @pekletsova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,081,079 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алина Пеклецова” (@pekletsova), 3,176 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pekletsova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.