爆冷的日常🤪 早起的鸟儿要去骑行了~等我回来😍🚴🏻♀️

Channel
PeiYu
@peiyuuu0515
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
45,456subscribers
-2,200 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001252565363 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @peiyuuu0515 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/peiyuuu0515 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 08:50 | 45,456 | +36 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 45,420 | -20 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:56 | 45,440 | -40 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:31 | 45,480 | -19 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:50 | 45,499 | +2,104 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:15 | 43,395 | +15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:50 | 43,380 | +15 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 43,365 | +3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:17 | 43,362 | -21 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 43,383 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 43,385 | -61 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:37 | 43,446 | +17 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 43,429 | +50 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:47 | 43,379 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 43,396 | -25 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 43,421 | -64 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:08 | 43,485 | -36 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 43,521 | -119 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 43,640 | -46 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 43,686 | first reading |
Engagement
295 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 27.1%
- avg views ÷ 45,456 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 12,300
- 88 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 89
- of 295 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 295 (31 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,083,650 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 38m 09s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 66 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 39 of 89 posts held from the last 30 days (43.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
晚上好✨🖤 送你💰免费体验⬇️ 这里免费注册: click here ⬅️直接点
通常这么多场我都会选我比较有信心的一两场来玩, 你们也可以看看哪个比较有灵感, 如果跟我一起 陪我玩, 赢或者没有赢我都私下发红包给你OK🤣🫶🏻 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 这里免费注册: click here ⬅️直接点 现在注册就送体验金给你免费玩!
⚽ Nottingham Forest vs Manchester City 曼市需要一场胜利来找回状态,虽然 Nottingham主场不好踢,但我还是比较看好曼市 🎯 我的盲猜: 🥇Nottingham Forest 1:2 Manchester City 🥈Nottingham Forest 0:2 Manchester City 娱乐参考,球是圆的,什么结果都有可能🤣
⚽ Fulham vs Newcastle 这场真的比较难猜,两队都有机会,感觉会是一场蛮接近的比赛。 🎯 我的盲猜: 🥇Fulham 1-1 Newcastle 🥈Fulham 2-1 Newcastle 娱乐参考💕你们要自己思考啊
⚽ Arsenal vs Hull City Arsenal 主场作战,整体实力和进攻能力都占优势。这场我比较看好 Arsenal 轻松拿下! 🎯 我的盲猜: 🥇Arsenal 3-0 Hull City 🥈Arsenal 2-0 Hull City 娱乐参考,理性思考🤣
Leeds United vs Tottenham Spurs 最近状态不错, 不过 Leeds 主场也不好踢。 我觉得Tottenham还是有机会拿下比赛。 🎯 我的盲猜预测: 🥇Leeds 1-2 Tottenham 🥈Leeds 1-1Tottenham 娱乐参考,我也是猜的啊🤣
红包🧧突袭!!记得打开通知📢 只要在群里 每天都有福利宠你🧧 12Bet有一个体育大红利! 存RM500送RM500! 很适合我们喜欢玩足球体育的宝宝😍 存款了慢慢跟我一起玩 娱乐一下😍 这里免费注册: click here ⬅️直接点 现在注册就送体验金给你免费玩!
早安宝宝 今天也是美好的一天哦🫶🏻 今天有足球盲猜哦! 陪我一起玩一点点😜 看可不可以带你们飞一下😆
免费送体验金的活动还在继续哦! 只要注册就可以拿到 没有条件!不用存款!不用花一分钱! 赢了还可以提出来哦! 快来吧💕我在这里等你哦🫶🏻 客服小姐姐在这里:@my12bet
来了来了 现在有进RM50送RM50的活动哦!! 100%的红利!!! 体验一下我们的服务💕给我一个机会 有我在这里陪你✨你随时可以找到我🫶🏻 这里免费注册: click here ⬅️直接点
早安✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 295 posts we hold for @peiyuuu0515. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@peiyuuu0515 edited 15 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 17 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @peiyuuu0515 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 8 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 31 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 3
Polls
The 6 most recent of 22 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
等下送💰免费玩?
- 在等你!😍99%
- 没有🤪1%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你们和我一样吗 还是这种东西不那么重要 随便就好
- 重要68%
- 不重要32%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你们是不是都会有这样的一天?
- 是36%
- 不是65%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你们这场比较看好哪一边?
- Leeds48%
- Man United?52%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
你们知不知道/有没有观察过平台的这个数据?
- 知道46%
- 不知道54%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
谁会拿下?
- Liverpool42%
- Manchester City59%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 295 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PeiYu” (@peiyuuu0515), 45,456 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peiyuuu0515.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.