Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PegidaNederland

@pegidanl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

408subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193472910
TypeChannel
Username@pegidanl
Created3 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pegidanl

Growth

408409408.57 Aug 2026, 19:57 — 409 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:45 — 409 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:51 — 408 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:578 Aug 2026, 10:51
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 408–409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:51408-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:45409no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:57409first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 408 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held16 (23 March 202626 July 2026)
Views total540
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 06:06 UTC88 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Wanneer een ideologisch-religieuze leer in wezenlijke delen de gelijkberechtiging van de seksen, de scheiding van religie en staat, de vrijheid van meningsuiting en het geweldsmonopolie van de staat afwijst of relativeert, stelt zich de vraag naar de grenzen van de tolerantie. Wat spreekt juridisch tegen een verbod van de islam als politiek-religieus totaalsysteem? Elke beperking van grondrechten moet uiteraard zorgv

23 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC94 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

zijn al jaren glashelder over hoe wij over de islam denken. In onze ogen is deze ideologie geen haar beter dan het nazisme. Sterker nog, wij beschouwen haar in deze tijd als de grootste bedreiging voor onze veiligheid en vrijheid en als een ideologie die niet integreerbaar is in onze samenleving. #Noislamjustfreedom

22 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC94 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Een maatregel waar wij al jarenlang voor pleiten, waarbij juist de combinatie van belang is. Laten we vooral niet hypocriet zijn door het hier te verbieden, maar de producten vervolgens gewoon uit het buitenland te blijven importeren. Willen we twee vliegen in één klap slaan – onnodig dierenleed voorkomen én de invloed van de islam terugdringen – dan is dit verbod een belangrijk hulpmiddel. Volgens het Europees Hof

21 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC86 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Moet er een totaalverbod komen op het dragen van een hoofddoek voor iedereen die werkzaam is bij de lokale en landelijke overheid?

13 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC137 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Vaak wordt beweerd dat radicaal-islamistisch gedachtengoed voortkomt uit de slechte economische omstandigheden waarin mensen verkeren, en dat meer welvaart ervoor zou zorgen dat zij afstand nemen van het fundamentalisme van hun woestijnreligie. Maar juist de volledig gesluierde vrouwen en ook kinderen die je bijvoorbeeld in Bolzano ziet – en als je op een terras zit, zie je er om de haverklap wel een langslopen – zi

10 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC153 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Haha, kom niet meer bij 🤣🤣🤣 Eerst durft @MinisterAenM het AZC in @terapel uit lafheid niet te bezoeken, en nu rennen de NGO’s, die deze mensen aan alle kanten helpen om naar Nederland te komen, ook met de staart tussen de benen weg. 🤣🤣 #RefugeesAreWelcomeHere 🤡

1 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTC290 viewsread 8 August 2026

Deel en teken a.u.b. https://share.google/EkS3dlqRzmn3DTYP0

7 May 2026, 06:34 UTC407 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Niet een paar ruitjes die worden ingegooid bij een gemeentehuis vormen een gevaar voor de democratie, maar het feit dat de politiek al jaren niet luistert naar een groot deel van de bevolking vormt een gevaar voor de democratie❗️

5 May 2026, 18:15 UTC321 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Gisteren liepen al enkele van onze mensen hiermee in de rechtbank, maar zeker op een dag als vandaag — 5 mei, waarop we zijn bevrijd van een foute ideologie — is dit T-shirt zeer passend. 😉

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pegidanl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PegidaNederland” (@pegidanl), 408 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pegidanl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.