bonded lmaoo this is such a good meme tbh
π₯4π1π1

Channel
@peelytrenches
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
6,411subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002063328593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @peelytrenches |
| Description | sharing my gems here π DM: @peely0x |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/peelytrenches |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 6,411 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 6,416 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 6,419 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 14 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 July 2026 β 14 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,247 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
76 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 27 | 35.5% | |
| π | 12 | 15.8% | |
| β€ | 9 | 11.8% | |
| π | 6 | 7.89% | |
| π | 5 | 6.58% | |
| π | 3 | 3.95% | |
| π | 3 | 3.95% | |
| π | 3 | 3.95% | |
| π | 2 | 2.63% | |
| β‘ | 1 | 1.32% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1 | 1.32% | |
| π | 1 | 1.32% | |
| π― | 1 | 1.32% | |
| π | 1 | 1.32% | |
| π± | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
bonded lmaoo this is such a good meme tbh
π₯4π1π1
one of my fav coins from leavehood $CJ carl johnson literally the nigga from the hood it got CTO'ed and they paid dex etc tier 1 narra for the launchpad 0x0c0bd4b70ecdc3843e73acf6bce7d4dfff1c9501
π3π2π₯2
probably found another good cook on leavehood potential 10-50x will send here if it passes my checks
π2π₯1π1
scanned it at 35k in the robinhood cabal a few spots opened join QUICK t.me/+KA6okvFarxQyODY0
π₯2π1π1
ΒπͺΆ Leavehood ($LEAVE) β 0x23f88eda2b24a0d45d4c3e2ad05edff30f860697 β #HOOD | 3d | ποΈ278 π Stats β USD $0.0005506 (+1K%) β MC $546.6K β Vol $185.9K β LP $34K β Sup 992.6M/1B β 1H -10% π©29 π₯21 β ATH $689.4K (-21% / 1h) π Socials [12d] β π [β½] β’ Web β’ [about] π Security β Top 10 23% | 302 (total) β TH 3.4|3.3|2.8|2.5|2.1 β DEX Paid π’ [info] β’ [lens] DEFβ’DSβ’EXPβ’πs GMβ’AXIβ’OKXβ’β¦
feeling like everyone's rotating to leavehood going to sleep on those 3 bags: $TIME (community coin) $π¨π© (epileptic by ecca) $LEAVE (launchpadβs coin)
π3π2π₯1
launched epileptic on robinhood $π¨π«π©π§ epileptic on robinhood color palette i sent it to 45m on solana i wanna flip that on robinhood, the pve chain 0xd6c1817c5cc822acaf19e85dabc58090ddc2e7ca
π₯4π1π―1
bro this maybe the new robinhood launchpad EVERYTHING just sends, wtf
β€1
almost 3x holy f
β€2π₯2π1
bonded, I think this could be a flagship coin for the launchpad if done well send it
π1π1π₯1
send it to the curve
π1π₯1π1
already 2x, looks juicy this could be the first bonder from the launchpad
π2π1π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @peelytrenches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βPeely's Trenches π΄β (@peelytrenches), 6,411 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peelytrenches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.