Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for با ادب ترین یوتوبر فارسی

Channel

با ادب ترین یوتوبر فارسی

@pedramknight

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

10,146subscribers

+1,824 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728157430
TypeChannel
Username@pedramknight
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pedramknight

Growth

8,32210,1469,2348 August 2026 — 8,322 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,322 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,877 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,984 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,503 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,835 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,942 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,971 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,005 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,035 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,073 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,095 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,126 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,146 subscribers8 August 20265 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 28 days, net +1,824. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,048–10,420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 00:3910,146+20
3 Sept 2026, 09:1510,126+31
2 Sept 2026, 03:0710,095+22
31 Aug 2026, 23:4910,073+38
31 Aug 2026, 00:5410,035+30
29 Aug 2026, 22:3710,005+34
27 Aug 2026, 09:139,971+29
24 Aug 2026, 17:179,942+107
20 Aug 2026, 15:089,835+332
18 Aug 2026, 00:029,503+519
14 Aug 2026, 23:578,984+107
11 Aug 2026, 19:228,877+555
8 Aug 2026, 18:038,322no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:008,322first reading

Engagement

128 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.0%
avg views ÷ 10,146 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,670
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 128 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held128 (20 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total504,435
Reactions total61,028
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 54s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

71,068 reactions across 127 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣43,79661.6%
12,68217.8%
🔥4,4836.31%
💔2,6963.79%
👍1,9762.78%
😭1,4952.10%
🤯1,0121.42%
💋9771.37%
🥰7401.04%
🍓6360.895%
🕊3730.525%
💘1700.239%
🙏320.045%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 127 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71,068 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
83
across the posts below
Posts paid on
33
of 127 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
31
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pedramknight. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 128 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC≈1,580 views347 reactions4 Starsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣31214😭11🥰4💔3💋2👍1

28 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC≈1,940 views338 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

داداش تریلر جدید جی تی ای رو دیدی؟ داداش بی شوخی میگم کص خار بازیه! گرافیکش خیلی بالاس انگار فیلمه مادرجنده! پسر عجب کصای بکنیم توش حرف نداره دیدی پلیس میوفته دنبالت؟ اگه لباساتو عوض کنی دیگه پلیس نمیشناستت..پسر باورم نمیشه! ترکوندی راکستار ترکوندی من فک کنم دیگه هیچ بازی مثلش نیاد شنیدی میگن اگه بنزین ماشینت تموم بشه ماشین خاموش میشه؟ دهنشونو گاییدم چجوری می‌سازن اینارو حرف ندارن واقعا شوکه شدم بنظرم بهترین بازی سال

🤣30617👍6🔥4🍓2💋2🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈3,720 views952 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video

حالا درسته که می‌خواستی ۶۰ تومن مانیتورو رایگان بهم بدی ولی داداش این چه صداییه ناموسا

🤣919👍13💔64🍓4🔥4💋1🕊1

27 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈3,590 views491 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

فقط بازی این شینجی میکامی مادر جنده رو تموم کنم

🤣46414👍12💋1

27 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈3,590 views558 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

بگم بالای ۳۰ نفر پیام دادید که داداش بیا مانیتور مارو رایگان بگیر یکی حتی پیام داد گفت داش بیا برا منو بگیر برای خودت اصلاً گفتم چنده حدقل ازت بخرم گفت ۶۰ تومن بینهایت خوشبختم که دارمتون ولی خب حس دلم خوب نیست اینجوری.. دیگه حالا حل شد اشکال نداره دوباره طلارو میخرم

546👍6💋3🤣3

27 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈3,610 views450 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣419👍148😭4💔3💋1🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈3,560 views518 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

فردا میرم مانیتور میخرم

💔467🔥2516👍7🤣2💋1

27 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈3,560 views508 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

ی گرم از طلامو فروختم

💔489👍11🤣5🔥2💋1

27 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈3,890 views704 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

الان به تعمیر کار نشون دادم گفت قابل تعمیر نیست ای خدا این ویدیوهایی که آخر شبا ضبط می‌کردم واسه کانال دوم تنها ساعت‌هایی از روز بود که باعث می‌شد از زندگی کسشرم دور بشم

💔678🤣15🍓5👍5💋1

27 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC≈3,940 views652 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

فک کنم تا ی مدت نا معلوم نمیتونم براتون ویدیو بسازم جدی پول مانیتور ندارم پسر

😭575💔64👍5🍓3🤣31💋1

27 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈4,010 views612 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

پنج دقیقه پیش مانیتورم شکست خخ

😭511🤣49💔328🔥5🤯2🍓1👍1

27 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈3,960 views464 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

بیست دقیقه پیش تصمیم گرفتم بلند شم و از افسردگیم گذر کنم و ادامه بدم

411🔥27🤣12👍4🕊4🤯4🍓1💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @pedramknight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“با ادب ترین یوتوبر فارسی” (@pedramknight), 10,146 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pedramknight.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.