Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РЕПЕТИТОР по русскому языку на REPEAT

Channel

РЕПЕТИТОР по русскому языку на REPEAT

@pedagog_na_REPEAT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

174subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002219064162
TypeChannel
Username@pedagog_na_REPEAT
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pedagog_na_REPEAT

Growth

167174170.58 August 2026 — 167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 167 subscribers16 August 2026 — 174 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 166–175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:06174+7
8 Aug 2026, 15:45167no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:32167first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 174 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.5
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (20 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total413
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1152.4%
👍419.0%
🔥419.0%
🤗29.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚 Суффиксы -ЕК- и -ИК-: как больше не путаться? Знакомая история: пишете «ключик», потом сомневаетесь, стираете и ставите «ключечик»? Или наоборот. Давайте раз и навсегда разберёмся с этой коварной парой! Правило очень простое и даже милое 🧐 В чём секрет? Всё зависит от того, что происходит со словом, когда мы его изменяем (например, по падежам). ✨ Суффикс -ИК- Он упрямый! Если при изменении слова гласная в суффиксе

7 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, спешу поделиться с самыми интересными образовательными телеграм-каналами, которые собраны в одной папке! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 💚Все каналы здесь💚 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⚠️⚠️ Доступ открыт только 72 часа! Подпишись сейчас! ♥️Есть канал? Участвуйте с нами! Телеграм Мах

3 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC35 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Начинаем с ребятами кропотливую работу над изложением. #русский_язык #ОГЭ файл помощник прикреплен в комментариях💬 Уроки русского язы

2🤗2

1 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC40 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пару свеженьких тестов на определение стиля и типа речи. Ссылка👇https://fliktop.ru/na_repeat/collections/stili-i-tipy-rechi/6e10c129-4bd4-4977-93f3-5911ba03e501 #FlikTop#стиль_речи#тип_речи

30 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC40 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://fliktop.ru/na_repeat/playlist/cards/spryazhenie-glagola/3bf6fd71-73fa-4071-8c25-1bcf26a950bb/?open=true

30 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC33 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья! 🌿📚 Чем ближе сентябрь, тем активнее педагоги начинают искать ресурсы для оформления своих материалов. Я очень люблю платформу FlikTop — как вы могли заметить по моим публикациям 😊Недавно заглянула туда после долгого перерыва и была приятно удивлена: теперь FlikTop даёт нам новую возможность использовать искусственный интеллект! ✨ Теперь можно создать тест, интерактивный лист, игру, доску или презентацию — и

29 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот несколько идей, как это сделать без скандалов: Правило двух глав. Договоритесь начать вместе читать книгу. Прочитайте две-три главы вслух. Если история «не зашла» — смело откладывайте. Нет плохих книг, есть книги, которые встретились не вовремя. 😉 Книга по фильму. Ребёнок обожает «Гарри Поттера» или «Властелина колец» в кино? Отлично! Предложите узнать «всю историю», ведь в книге всегда больше деталей, картинок и

1

29 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚 Заставлять ли ребёнка читать? Мнение нейросети и немного здравого смысла «Пока не прочитаешь 20 страниц — гулять не пойдёшь!» 👮‍♂️👧 Узнали себя в роли строгого родителя? Многие из нас выросли с убеждением, что чтение — это обязательная «витаминка» для ума, которую нужно принимать по часам, даже если сопротивляешься. Но так ли работает этот метод? Давайте разберёмся. Заставляя, мы рискуем добиться обратного эффект

28 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @czmashukPhoto

В ближайшие дни на платформе #ЦифровойМашук откроется новый онлайн-курс для наставников в цифровой среде ⬆️ Сегодня специалистам необходимо уметь защищать данные и репутацию, отличать достоверную информацию от фейков, безопасно использовать ИИ и создавать здоровую коммуникацию в цифровой среде. Именно этому посвящен новый бесплатный онлайн-курс «Наставничество в цифровой среде: практические инструменты и безопаснос

28 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 Решила проверить, как ИИ справляется с созданием учебных материалов. Задала программу на составление таблицы по стилям речи — сейчас с некоторыми ребятами повторяем эту тему. 👍 В целом результат меня порадовал: информация структурирована, наполнение полезное. Есть пара моментов, которые можно доработать (например, в графическом варианте дважды повторилось слово «деловой стиль»), но это легко исправить 🔍 ✨ Думаю,

1

23 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, заботливо напоминаю, что вы можете БЕСПЛАТНО использовать интерактивные тесты на моей страничке FlikTop😊 🔗 📙Корни с чередованием А//О 📔Корни с чередованием Е//И 📒ЕГЭ. 9 задание. Гласная от значения. 📙ЕГЭ. 10 зада

2

21 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Махаю» стало литературной нормой, равноправной «машу». Ранее «махаю» помечалось как разговорное. Лингвисты «Грамоты.ру» подтвердили: язык унифицируется, формы без чередования закрепились. «Большой словарь ударений» (2025) признаёт оба варианта равноправными . Почему важно: 1. Язык отражает реальность. 2. Унификация упрощает речь, убирает сложные чередования. 3. «Махаю» теперь не ошибка🤔(давайте ссылаться лучше на ф

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pedagog_na_REPEAT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,103,541 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РЕПЕТИТОР по русскому языку на REPEAT” (@pedagog_na_REPEAT), 174 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pedagog_na_REPEAT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.