Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Перламутровая Гроза

@pearlterror

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001853863631
TypeChannel
Username@pearlterror
DescriptionКультурологический анализ очень разной музыки и всякое прочее необычное.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pearlterror

Growth

509 Aug 2026, 03:47 — 50 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 11:30 — 50 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:4710 Aug 2026, 11:30
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:3050no change
9 Aug 2026, 03:4750first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
30
Videos
5
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 20s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3737.4%
🔥1717.2%
👍1313.1%
😁99.09%
💋44.04%
👏33.03%
💯33.03%
😱33.03%
❤‍🔥22.02%
🎉22.02%
👀22.02%
🤣22.02%
🙏11.01%
🦄11.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2023 to 4 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2024, 20:35 UTC158 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

мне тут говорят, что никто, кроме меня, не знает все тексты группы nrktk. да они заблуждаются, правда? правда ведь?..

💯3

3 Sept 2024, 13:25 UTC170 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Все знают вот эти подводки Родного Звука, в которых каждый раз обещают «сумрачный дрим-поп», «чувственный рнб», «закатный соул», «пасмурное инди» и прочее такое витиеватое, которое никогда не оказывается правдой? 😔 За два года стабильных обманов я научилась просто игнорировать эту предложку и никогда не открывать новые имена. Не ходить по ссылкам, не расстраиваться. Не смотреть неубедительные проплаченные посты, не

3

24 Jul 2024, 11:08 UTC177 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Проигрыш – это проигрыш.

😁52🤣2

8 Jun 2024, 08:48 UTC235 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁43

4 Apr 2024, 19:21 UTC282 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @uchprocPhoto

Рясов А. Едва слышный гул. Введение в философию звука, 2021.

4👍1

10 Mar 2024, 10:23 UTC301 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Кейт Буш – но по болгарской лицензии. Не смогла установить точный год производства. Признавайтесь, кто на досуге примеряет на себя амплуа музыкальных продуцентов, м

6

14 Feb 2024, 11:52 UTC451 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Булочки, внемлите. романтический микстейп для вас: немножко раритетного японского фанка, капелька редкого рнб 70-х, много советских раритетов и роскошный чувственный финал. сегодня ставлю его на складе №3 в 20:00 👄

10💋4👍1

6 Feb 2024, 16:05 UTC265 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вообще, я просто готовлю новый курс по музыке, в котором буду рассказывать об отражении разных аспектов сексуальной революции через популярную музыку (от ванильных восторгов до апокалиптических настроений); про роль церкви в поставке соул и кантри артистов в топы чартов, а также про особенности репрезентации любви и секса в советской и постсоветской музыке. Пока ломаю голову над оптимальной формой и переводом своих м

🔥8👍2🙏1

6 Feb 2024, 16:00 UTC225 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Тётя-мотя дня – ирландская певица Салли Олдфилд и её восьмиминутная двухчастная баллада Blue Water с альбома Celebration 1980 года. По непонятной мне причине гоняю по кругу уже третий час без явных признаков усталости. Конечно, немножко жаль, что вторая часть не такая экспериментальная и мурашковая, как первая, ну и что. Всем не угодишь.

❤‍🔥1

17 Dec 2023, 09:57 UTC247 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Короче, начинаю эксперименты с форматами, а то я придумала себе клетку структуры, и мне в ней хуево 😭 The Style Council – It Didn’t Matter (1987) Очень изысканная песня, весь год сижу на этой стильной иголочке. Вдруг обнаружила, что на нее есть классный клип, в котором они играют для очень делового кокаинового шмыги из музыкального бизнеса. Еще покопаю, есть подозрение, что этот персонаж может быть отсылкой на как

🦄1

13 Dec 2023, 15:46 UTC401 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

С. Марков и группа Оберманекен – «О, Маркиза де Сад» (1989), Центрнаучфильм. Там, короче, чуваки в 1989 году на денежку Центрнаучфильма сняли оргию в заброшенном амфитеатре, и всё это под хорошую музыку собственного сочинения. Я не знаю, что еще добавить. #этапесня

🔥7😱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @pearlterror. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,221,270 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Перламутровая Гроза” (@pearlterror), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pearlterror.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.