Channel
@pdtag
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002748410916 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pdtag |
| Description | @Dubai888 @Americascard |
| Created | 9 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pdtag |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 2 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
💎 Я предлагал Максу Крауну внедрить Кодекс поведения для сотрудников ТФ, но предложение осталось без ответа. Так как скандалы продолжаются, решил озвучить его ещё раз — теперь публично. Пожалуйста поддержите реакциями и репостами, если считаете это важным.
TON снова публикует красивый отчёт: «новый CEO, Coinbase в списке холдеров, Jetton 2.0 в три раза быстрее, рекорды на NFT и мемкойнах». Всё звучит как будто экосистема живёт своим лучшим временем. Но обратите внимание: ни слова о том, что реально волнует пользователей и разработчиков. ▪️ Где признание того, что NFT 2.0 метит токены нарушителями даже после честной оплаты роялти? ▪️ Где разбор того, что кошельки слив…
Каждый мог словить такой лайф-чендж. Вам всего-то надо было иметь $57. И потом ещё примерно по $150 на каждое улучшение (~$2700 в сумме), и знакомство с Павлом Дуровым и разработчиками Телеграм, чтобы обладать инсайдерской информацией о точной дате и времени выхода улучшений. Изи! Каждый мох! Я не против хороших нарративов, но раздражает, когда искажают информацию и выдают невозможное за как будто бы доступное каждо…
Математика от Pepe-цзы Монах учил самого глупого ученика ударом палкой по голове. Наступало просветление. Вопрос: сколько палок нужно для просветления Тon Foundation?
🤔
[PD]tag pinned «🏴☠️Usernames for sale on Fragment @Dubai888 @Americascard 🔥@pokerprince @pdtag @gltag @chipcount @notraise @pokershard 🔥@pokerstrike @pokermission @pokerlabel @pokersnap @pokerfresh @pokerpow @pokerprey»
💎 В свежем материале детально разбираются ключевые критические замечания в адрес блокчейна TON, касающиеся его децентрализации и развития экосистемы.
🏴☠️Usernames for sale on Fragment @Dubai888 @Americascard 🔥@pokerprince @pdtag @gltag @chipcount @notraise @pokershard 🔥@pokerstrike @pokermission @pokerlabel @pokersnap @pokerfresh @pokerpow @pokerprey
https://fragment.com/username/pdtag
Имя @pdtag выставлено на аукцион. Владелец установил минимальную ставку 💎2,500.
Video, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pdtag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,032,093 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pdtag named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[PD]tag” (@pdtag), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pdtag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.