BUY EURUSD ENTRY 0.9750 SL 0.9678 TP 0.9770 TP 0.9800 TP 0.9850

Channel
Philippine Digital Asset Exchange PDAX
@pdaxph
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001757631062 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pdaxph |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 12 September 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pdaxph |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 37 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 38 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 38 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 12 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2022 to 5 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝘀𝗸 𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗜 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗜 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗵 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝘆 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳, 𝗺𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝘀𝘄𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗜𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗷𝗼𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗶𝘀. 𝗛𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗮𝘆 ''𝗜𝗳 𝗶𝘁 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗜 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻'𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 ''. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗷𝗼𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲, 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆'𝗿𝗲
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS🤝✅🎉
‼️FIRST COME FIRST SERVE‼️ 💰💰 I’m given out this trading plan to everyone;text me on this offer💰💰 INVEST $500 get back $15,000 INVEST $1000 get back $33,000 This is a 7days trading plan...20% of profit made belongs to my teammates and I..this is our only charge!!! Send text now👇🏻👇🏻 @Trader_m_FX
We don't make promises we show results... successful transaction everyday, every hour, every minute..... Congratulations 🎉🎊🎈🍾 to all our investors. Thank you for trusting and investing with this great teamwork ❤️. We’ll not relent in making you win✅
❤1
Start investing today to create a passive source of income for yourself. Invest and earn profits while you sleep 💯 😊
NEW PROMO‼️‼️ $100 to earn $900 $200 to earn $2400 $300 to earn $3800 $400 to earn $5000 $500 to earn $6000 $600 to earn $7000 within 2 days of trading, but you will send me 15% from your profits when you receive it.. Ask me how. @Trader_m_FX
Investment ongoing Contact admin now to join🤝🎉✅
Welcome joining my team buddy🎉🤝✅ INVESTMENT CAPITAL RECEIVED 📊🎊💰
*Those who invest with us will get a token*🥳
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @pdaxph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 709,186 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pdaxph named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Philippine Digital Asset Exchange PDAX” (@pdaxph), 37 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pdaxph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.