Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

千禧💭时空隧道

@pcyl8

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,113subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002154469303
TypeChannel
Usernames@pctopqx @pcyl8
Created10 July 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pcyl8

Growth

2,1132,1242,118.58 August 2026 — 2,124 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,124 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,123 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,123 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,118 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,116 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,113 subscribers8 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,111–2,126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:332,113-3
11 Aug 2026, 23:262,116-2
9 Aug 2026, 18:112,118-5
8 Aug 2026, 19:432,123no change
8 Aug 2026, 19:002,123no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:492,123-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:202,124no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:192,124first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 10 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8055.2%
3826.2%
😁149.66%
🥰74.83%
🔥53.45%
💩10.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2024 to 13 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Apr 2025, 11:07 UTC≈5,340 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

〰️〰️〰️ 📱📱📱📱〰️ 〰️ 〰️ 🤣 娱乐板块 🤣 ⭐ 极品色色 ⭐ 休闲娱乐 ⭐ 文案素材 ⭐ 交流大群 ⭐ T G 工具 ⭐ 精品修车 😒 小 千 禧 频道内容均为免费,请放心食用 部分内容为搬运,自行斟酌使用 擦亮眼睛,注意身体,谨防受骗

3🥰3👍1

26 Mar 2025, 15:59 UTC≈4,840 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gunxueqiu8Photo

😃 加拿大28资金盘骗局 3.5%返水背后,是庄家“反方向的割”‌ 昨日,加拿大28短期资金盘惊现网络。该骗局专门骗取水军的资金,不少人已深受其害。3月25日,好旺担保851公群上押30万U,赔率为4.2、4.6、2.0,开13/14赔率为1.6,大家看赔率似无异常的常规群,但其反水率高达3.5%。小马收到群友的判定请求的时候及时在群里进行了分析,结果为确实能刷。 信息链接1: https://t.me/gunxueqiu88/497580 信息链接2:https://t.me/gunxueqiu88/497484 明知超水,但群管理员仍放任水军刷水(谎称新群为推广无限制),水军更是肆无忌惮,直接同时押注大1万、小1万。小马对此行为深感疑惑在进一步思考中发现,该群的3.5%反水并非实时返还是延迟到次日00点发放‌,3.5%返水竟是糖衣炮弹!庄家可随时卷款跑路!你刷得越狠,他赚得越稳!以下是小马最初分析的结果 信息链接3:

2👍1

19 Mar 2025, 14:10 UTC≈3,260 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gunxueqiu8Photo

😀《小马发财日记之翻身》 大家好!我是你们的老友小马 @xiaoma 许多朋友在很早之前就与我有过交集,相识相知。不认识我的朋友们也许也曾听说过我。曾经,我只是搞漏洞大军里的一员,那段日子里靠着些许技术以及对漏洞的敏锐嗅觉,在各个平台带走了累计100万U左右的收益,对于当时的我来说可谓赚得盆满钵满。然而,那时的我还未成年,在财富面前也迷失在迷雾中,无度的吃喝与挥霍仿佛要将所有的快乐都一次性尝尽,就这样很快我的钱包就只躺着孤零零的30万U。 在飞机这个充满机遇与挑战的社交平台上,我渴望结识更多的英雄好汉,一起探索这片未知的领域。于是,我创建了一个频道——“小马发财日记 @gunxueqiu8 ”,旨在结交更多的朋友,缩小作为单体的我们之间的信息差以及认知差,帮助我们一起在这个飞机的世界赚取一些额外的财富。事实证明这样的做法确实给关注频道的朋友以及群里经常讨论的朋友带来了一定量额外的财富。 再后来一段时间,我看着钱包里作为我希

1

4 Mar 2025, 17:20 UTC≈4,030 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📢 🔥小马得吃扫雷开业活动,福利狂送!🔥 🎉 小马扫雷玩家专属福利,稳赚不赔! 🎉 🚀 活动规则: 🔹 在3月1号前任意游戏群参与单笔下注10U以上的游戏记录 🔹 提供下注记录给客服审核 🔹 单笔下注10U,输了包赔,赢了全归你! 💰 进群链接: t.me/+65O8yU-kmUIxNDk9 🎁 稳赚不赔,轻松拿福利! 输了不怕,我们给你补!赢了全归你,稳赚不亏! 机会难得,别错过这波免费福利! 📅 活动时间:3月5号-7号 📌 联系客服提交记录,立即领取福利! 🔥 小马得吃扫雷,全网最良心的活动,等你来战! 💎

1👍1

1 Dec 2024, 14:25 UTC≈33,200 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😃😃😀😃😀😃😃😃😀 😀😀😀😀😃😃😀😀😀😀😀😀 小马刁哈哈快三 t.me/+txkbi5l2rWs0MDZh 😀😀😀😀 😃😃😀😀😀😀😀😀 小马刁哈哈牛牛 t.me/+nqa5ZciiQnY5MTFl 😀😀😀😀😃😃😀😀😀😀😀😀 小马刁哈哈扫雷 t.me/+65O8yU-kmUIxNDk9 👋 立即加入,抢福利、玩游戏、赢大奖! 小马快三 牛牛 扫雷!精彩不断!让您的娱乐之旅更加轻松愉快!

👍234🥰4💩1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @pcyl8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 86,397 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“千禧💭时空隧道” (@pcyl8), 2,113 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pcyl8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.