3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,042–1,043 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 00:53
1,042
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:19
1,043
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:20
1,043
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 1,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
2,585
Reactions total
49
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
33
67.3%
👌
8
16.3%
🎉
4
8.16%
👏
4
8.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
올해 2분기 실적 발표 시즌을 통해 글로벌 빅파마들의 ‘선택과 집중’ 기조가 한층 뚜렷해졌습니다. 성공 가능성이 낮은 후보물질은 과감히 ‘정리’하는 대신, 후기 임상 단계나 상업화가 임박한 성장 자산에 연구개발(R&D) 역량과 자본을 ‘집중’하는 전략 변화가 실적 발표와 콘퍼런스콜을 통해 확인됐습니다.
특허만료(LOE)와 R&D 비용 증가, 비만·항암 등 핵심 시장의 경쟁 심화로 R&D 투자 효율성의 중요성도 커지고 있습니다. 이에 따라 글로벌 빅파마들은 성장 파이프라인 육성과 개발 우선순위 재조정, R&D 투자 효율화를 공통적으로 강조했습니다.
<더바이오>가 주요 글로벌 빅파마들의 2분기 실적 발표를 분석한 결과, 이같은 변화는 단순한 비용 절감보다, R&D 자원의 ‘전략적 재배분’에 가깝습니다. 성공 가능성이 낮거나 전략적 우선순위가 …
[1상 톱라인] 안트로젠이 중증 무릎 골관절염 환자를 대상으로 진행한 ‘ANT-301’ 국내 임상1상에서 시험약과 관련한 이상반응과 용량제한독성(DLT)이 관찰되지 않았다는 톱라인 결과를 확보했다고 공시했습니다.
통증과 무릎 기능 등을 평가한 탐색적 유효성 지표에서는 기저치 대비 개선 신호가 확인됐습니다.
다만 이번 임상은 대조군 없이 환자 6명을 대상으로 진행한 안전성 중심의 초기 시험입니다.
https://www.thebionews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=26931
큐리언트, ‘이중 페이로드 ADC’ AACR 채널서 ‘새로 떠오르는 치료 전략’ 4건 중 하나로 선정...QP101, 이중 약리 작용으로 광범위한 HER2 양성 환자군에서 더 지속성 높은 치료 효능 가능성 기대, 자체 ADC 개발을 넘어 ADC 플랫폼으로서 글로벌 기술 경쟁력을 지속적으로 입증 목표
https://www.thebionews.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=26883
오스코텍, 오픈이노베이션 역량 강화...S&E팀 신설
- 연구기획팀 내 전담 기능 신설, 전문인력 영입...후속 채용·조직개편 추진
https://www.thebell.co.kr/front/newsview.asp?code=00&key=202607310747344660103828
AZ–BMS 합병 논의 (FT, 8/2 일요일 보도 · 현재까지 양사 공식 확인 없음)
딜 개요
• 아스트라제네카가 BMS와 결합을 논의 중. 최근 수개월간 진행됐고 조만간 성사될 수도 있으나 지연·무산 가능성도 병존
• 합산 시총 약 4,000억달러 → 성사 시 시총 기준 글로벌 4위 제약사. AZ 약 1,960억파운드(≈2,600억달러), BMS 약 1,330억달러
• 구조는 미확정이나 현금+주식 혼합이 유력. AZ 사상 최대 딜인 알렉시온(2021년, 390억달러)을 크게 상회
전략적 배경
• AZ: 2030년 매출 800억달러 목표(2025년 587억달러). 이미 매출의 절반 가까이가 미국인 만큼 성장의 상당 부분을 미국에 의존. 6월 뉴욕 직상장 완료로 미국 비중 확대 흐름과 일관됨. 다만 소리오 CEO는 지난주 컨콜에…
존슨앤존슨, 고형암 파이프라인 구축 시동
메디칼업저버
https://naver.me/G1pb5qBz
■ 존슨앤존슨은 현재 보유 중인 고형암 치료제의 적용 범위를 넓히기 위한 연구도 이어가고 있다.
임상1/1b상 CHRYSALIS-2 연구에서 비정형 EGFR 변이 비소세포폐암 환자에게 리브리반트와 유한양행 렉라자(레이저티닙) 병용요법을 1차 치료로 투여했다.
분석 결과 ORR은 57%였으며, 전체생존(OS) 중앙값은 41개월로 나타났다.
■ 파이어플라이 인수로 DAC 플랫폼 확보
존슨앤존슨은 파이어플라이바이오를 10억달러에 인수했다.
파이어플라이바이오는 Firelink 분해제 항체 접합제(DAC) 플랫폼을 개발해 왔다. DAC는 고선택적 단백질 분해제를 암세포에 직접 전달하는 기술로, 정상 조직을 보존하면서 표적치료를 가능하게 한다…
👍3
Signed 시젠 안
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pb_apn_ahn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“제약바이오 선진강국 진입을 위하여(부제: 허위와 진실의 규명)” (@pb_apn_ahn), 1,042 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pb_apn_ahn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
