6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,390–2,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 07:22
2,400
-24
12 Aug 2026, 15:04
2,424
-19
9 Aug 2026, 20:31
2,443
-20
6 Aug 2026, 13:20
2,463
-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:35
2,465
no change
5 Aug 2026, 20:02
2,465
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.47%
avg views ÷ 2,400 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.3
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
39 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
3,250
Reactions total
67
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
17
44.7%
❤
9
23.7%
💔
4
10.5%
👏
3
7.89%
🔥
2
5.26%
😍
2
5.26%
😢
1
2.63%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دل رفت ؛ ولی بار دگر در به در آمد
عاشق نشدی ؛ قصه ما هم به سر آمد
دیدار تو غم بود و نبودت ؛ غم دیگر
این درد نرفتست که درد دگر آمد
خودکار به لب برده ای از عمق تفکر
خودکار به لب رفت ولی نیشکر آمد
با چشم ترم هر غزلم را به تو دادم
هر بیت ترم در نظرت بی اثر آمد
صد میوه نوبر به تو بخشیدم و امروز
جای ثمرم بر کمرم ؛ این تبر آمد
با دیدن رخساره یکتا ی تو دل رفت
دل رفت ولی بار دگر ؛ در به در آمد
🖤
بیتو از گلشن چه حاصل خاطر افسرده را؟
خندهٔ گل دردسر میآورد آزرده را
ساغری خواهم دم آخر مگر همراه او
سوی تن باز آورم جان به لب آورده را
نه همین بیسوز عشقَست، از هوس هم گرم نیست
سینه تابوت است گویی زاهد دلمرده را
کاغذ غمنامه را کردم حنایی از سرشک
تا به یاد او دهم چشم به خون پرورده را
صورت ظاهر اگر در حسن باشد، آفتاب
آورد تاریکی دل پی به معنی برده را
دل مکَن از دوست گر خواهی به او پیوست باز
کس به گلبن تا به کی…
به کیش اهل حقیقت کسی که درویش است
به یاد روی تو مشغول و فارغ از خویش است
ز پوست تخت و کلاه نمد مکن منعم
که در دیار فنا تخت و تاج درویش است
به تیر غمزه و نازت ز هر کنار بسی
به خون تپیده چو من سینه چاک و دلریش است
رموز رندی و مستی به شیخ شهر مگوی
که این منافق دور از خدا بداندیش است
هوای کوی خرابات و آب میخانه
به از هوای دزاشیب و آب تجریش است
بشوی دست ز دنیا و پند من بنیوش
که مهر او همه کین است و نوش او نیش است
تو…
دل تنگم و دلتنگ نبودی که بدانی چه کشیدم
عاشق نشدی، لنگ نبودی که بدانی چه کشیدم
کو قطره اشکی که به پای تو بریزم که بمانی؟
بیاسلحه در جنگ نبودی که بدانی چه کشیدم
تو آن بت مغرور پیمبر شکنی، داغ ندیدی
دل بسته به یک سنگ نبودی که بدانی چه کشیدم
تو تابلوی حاصل دستان هنرمند خدایی
نقاشی بیرنگ نبودی که بدانی چه کشیدم
گشتم همه جا را پی چشمان پر از شوق تو اما
فرسنگ به فرسنگ نبودی که بدانی چه کشیدم
#سید_تقی_سیدی
#خوانش : …
ماجرای من و تو، باورِ باورها نیست
ماجراییست که در حافظهِ دنیا نیست
نه دروغیم نه رویا نه خیالیم نه وَهم
ذاتِ عشقیم که در آینه ها پیدا نیست
#دکلمه : #حس_برتر
.
ماجرای من و تو، باورِ باورها نیست
ماجراییست ڪه در حافظهِ دنیا نیست
نه دروغیم نه رویا نه خیالیم نه وَهم
ذاتِ عشقیم ڪه در آینهها پیدا نیست
تو ڪَُمی درمن و من درتو ڪَمم باورڪن
جز در این شعر نشان و اثری از ما نیست
شب ڪه آرامتر از پلڪ تو را می بندم
با دلم طاقت دیدارِ تو تا فردا نیست
من و تو ساحل و دریای هَمیم اما نه!
ساحل اینقدر که درفاصله با دریا نیست...
#محمدعلی_بهمنی
یأس را هرگز مباد ای دوست در دل ره دهی
زان که در این راه میافتی به چاه گمرهی
نا امیدی میکند محرومش از الطاف حق
گر کسی را نیست از الطاف یزدان آگهی
از عدم یک گام نبود بیش تا ملک قدم
همچنین یک گام باشد از گدایی تا شهی
گشته زندانی مخوف از بهر دانایان محیط
فتنهها از ابلهان خیزد امان از ابلهی
مقصد از خلق بشر عرفان حق بود از ازل
ساغر وحدت مباد از باده عرفان تهی
@Kaaffeh🕯
#وحدت_کرمانشاهی
🌟در این شب آرام ..
💜دعایتان میکنم بخیر
🌟نگاهتان میکنم به پاکی
💜یادتان میکنم بخوبی
🌟هرجا هستید
💜بهترینها را برایتان آرزو دارم
🌟شبی زیباو سراسر آرامش
💜در آغوش پر مهرخدا داشته باشید
💫 شبتون بخیر 💖
🌙
👍1
Signed امیر
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @payamkhooneh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,196,862 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ساحل آرامش” (@payamkhooneh), 2,400 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/payamkhooneh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.