Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇺🇦ПАВЛОГРАД ОФІЦІЙНИЙ🇺🇦

Channel

🇺🇦ПАВЛОГРАД ОФІЦІЙНИЙ🇺🇦

@pavlogradmrada

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,323subscribers

-174 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001680138738
TypeChannel
Username@pavlogradmrada
Description✅Офіційний телеграм канал Павлоградського виконкому✔️ На цьому каналі публікується лише перевірена офіційна інформація✅ Попереджений - озброєний😌
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pavlogradmrada

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@pavlogradmrada/45451 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC@ptrkmedia/5771311 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC1.0010 minutes
@ptrkmedia/5772111 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC@pavlogradmrada/45464 · this entry12 Nov 2026, 07:11 UTC1.0017 hours
@ptrkmedia/5772511 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC@pavlogradmrada/45463 · this entry12 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC1.0014 hours
@huevuy_nmsk/1032508 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC@pavlogradmrada/42150 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC1.002 minutes
@pavlogradmrada/42288 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC@huevuy_nmsk/10349813 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@pavlogradmrada/42405 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC@huevuy_nmsk/10366317 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mykola_lukashuk56 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0072 seconds@mykola_lukashuk (56–0)
@ptrkmedia41 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutes@ptrkmedia (23–18)
@huevuy_nmsk11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@huevuy_nmsk (6–5)
@pavlograd_tp6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9929 minutesthis entry (6–0)
@pavlograd_now11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.994 minutes@pavlograd_now (6–5)
@pavlograd_today5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.994 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@Avariika_Pavlohrad5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.982 minutesthis entry (3–2)
@ecopatrolNK9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (5–4)
@dnipropetrovskaODA17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutes@dnipropetrovskaODA (17–0)
@pro_pavlograd_ternivka_pokrovsk5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@war_ua_227 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0031 minutesthis entry (5–2)
@prikhist10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9910 minutes@prikhist (7–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 38 of the 38 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 337 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @mykola_lukashuk. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,32313,50513,4147 August 202613 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -174. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,296–13,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 13:2013,323-14
11 Nov 2026, 02:3013,337+4
9 Nov 2026, 12:1513,333-4
8 Nov 2026, 00:5013,337-6
7 Nov 2026, 01:4913,343-4
6 Nov 2026, 02:5913,347-2
5 Nov 2026, 01:0913,349-3
4 Nov 2026, 01:2913,352+1
2 Nov 2026, 23:4513,351-4
1 Nov 2026, 22:0613,355+10
31 Oct 2026, 21:5913,345+7
31 Oct 2026, 00:1013,338-3
30 Oct 2026, 01:1713,341-3
29 Oct 2026, 02:4813,344-2
27 Oct 2026, 22:3913,346-2
26 Oct 2026, 22:0113,348+5
26 Oct 2026, 00:3513,343-5
24 Oct 2026, 22:5513,348-11
23 Oct 2026, 20:5913,359-2
22 Oct 2026, 20:4913,361first reading

Engagement

501 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 13,323 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
193 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.963%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
193
of 501 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 164 of 193 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held501 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total433,465
Reactions total3,754
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈34,300
Videos
≈2,040
Links
≈9,730

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
56m 07s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 54 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,385 reactions across 425 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢7,69862.2%
❤2,60221.0%
👌6455.21%
👍4783.86%
👎3893.14%
🕊3022.44%
❤‍🔥730.589%
🔥610.493%
👏490.396%
💯410.331%
🥰230.186%
🤗150.121%
😍90.073%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 429 of the 501 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,385 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 501 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 193 posts held from the last 30 days (6.22%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,450 views43 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @ptrkmediaVideo

🚨 Станом на 20:30 у Павлограді відомо про 10 поранених унаслідок російської атаки. Серед постраждалих — чотири жінки, троє чоловіків та семирічний хлопчик, який перебуває у стані середньої тяжкості. Також відомо про одного загиблого чоловіка. За словами місцевих мешканців, він отримав смертельні поранення уламками скла у власній квартирі. На місці події працюють усі необхідні служби. Інформація про наслідки атаки …

😢41❤1👍1

14 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,870 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @ptrkmediaVideo

🏚 У Павлограді гуманітарна місія «Проліска» допомагає мешканцям, чиї будинки постраждали внаслідок російської атаки. Начальниця гуманітарного центру місії «Проліска» розповіла, що постраждалим видають будівельні матеріали для першочергового ремонту — OSB-плити, плівку та монтажну піну. Наразі допомогу отримали вже близько 100 домогосподарств. Робота триває. Також фахівці консультують мешканців та формують списки ти…

❤11👌7👍2

14 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC≈2,150 views40 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @ptrkmediaVideo

🚨 Заступник міського голови Павлограда прокоментував наслідки ракетного удару по місту. За попередньою інформацією, значних пошкоджень зазнали щонайменше дев’ять житлових будинків. На жаль, одна людина загинула, ще шестеро звернулися по медичну допомогу. На місці працюють усі необхідні служби, постраждалим мешканцям надають допомогу. Завтра зранку роботи продовжаться, а спеціальна комісія розпочне обстеження пошкод…

😢38❤2

14 Nov 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,400 views35 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @dnipropetrovskaODAPhoto

Дніпропетровщина 14 листопада 18:30 Одна людина загинула, ще 13 дістали поранень. Серед постраждалих – дитина. Майже 30 разів ворог атакував чотири райони. Бив безпілотниками, артилерією та ракетою. ▪️ У Павлограді пошкоджені багатоквартирні будинки та заклади освіти. Одна людина загинула. 8 людей, серед яких 7-річний хлопчик, госпіталізовані у стані середньої тяжкості. Ще двоє постраждалих лікуватимуться вдома. …

😢31❤4

14 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,480 views38 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @dnipropetrovskaODAPhoto

На місці ворожої атаки у Павлограді вже працює гуманітарна організація «Проліска». Мешканцям пошкоджених осель благодійники надають OSB-листи, плівку та монтажну піну для першочергового ремонту. Через ракетний удар росіян пошкоджені щонайменше 9 будинків. У них понівечені вікна, балкони та двері.

😢32❤6

14 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC≈2,170 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @pavlograd_nowVideo

У Павлограді на місці ракетного удару працюють фахівці та надають допомогу постраждалим Наразі на місці працює ГМ «Проліска», представники якої надають постраждалим необхідні матеріали для ліквідації наслідків обстрілу. Також завтра, у неділю, з 09:00 на місці працюватимуть представники Центру надання адміністративних послуг (ЦНАП). Мешканці, чиє майно зазнало пошкоджень, зможуть отримати консультації, допомогу з …

😢23❤4👌1

14 Nov 2026, 15:39 UTC≈2,380 views41 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @dnipropetrovskaODAPhoto

Наслідки ворожої атаки на Павлоград. #russiaisaterroriststate

😢39❤2

14 Nov 2026, 15:02 UTC≈2,620 views69 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @dnipropetrovskaODA

‼️ Одна людина загинула через ворожий удар по Павлограду Десять людей дістали поранень. Четверо жінок, троє чоловіків і 7-річний хлопчик госпіталізовані у стані середньої тяжкості. Ще двоє жінок лікуватимуться амбулаторно. #russiaisaterroriststate

😢66❤3

14 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC≈3,310 views57 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @dnipropetrovskaODA

‼️Троє людей поранені через атаку росіян на Павлоград. Серед них - 7-річний хлопчик. Усі в лікарні. Медики обстежують їх і надають необхідну допомогу. #russiaisaterroriststate

😢55❤2

14 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC≈3,500 views71 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @dnipropetrovskaODA

‼️Ворог завдав ударів по Павлограду. Попередньо, є поранені. Уточнюємо їхню кількість та наслідки атаки. #russiaisaterroriststate

😢70❤1

14 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC≈3,620 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @ptrkmediaPhoto

Що потрібно знати про флюорографію: показання, можливості та регулярність обстежень? 🇺🇦ПТРК – Підпишись З приводу реклами: @ptrk_direkt

👌1

14 Nov 2026, 06:59 UTC≈3,590 views120 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Forwarded from @ptrkmediaPhoto

🕯 Загальнонаціональна хвилина мовчання. Галич Дмитро Юрійович — у 2016–2018 роках служив за контрактом, учасник АТО; 27 лютого 2022 року призваний до ЗСУ, розвідник десантно-штурмової бригади. Загинув в місті Ізюм на Харківщині. Йому було 37 років. Вшановуємо пам’ять загиблих Героїв. 🙏 🇺🇦ПТРК – Підпишись З приводу реклами: @ptrk_direkt

😢111🕊8👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 501 posts we hold for @pavlogradmrada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

‼️‼️‼️ Повітряна тривога Павлоград🚨‼️‼️
@pavlogradsirena · 26,521
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 September 2026
Pavlograd_now | 24/7 Павлоград Терновка Першотравенск
@pavlograd_now · 99,292
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
news pavlograd 📰🔝
@news_pavlograd · 37,490
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
Дніпро⚡️Незламний
@dnipro_nez · 22,888
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇺🇦ПАВЛОГРАД ОФІЦІЙНИЙ🇺🇦” (@pavlogradmrada), 13,323 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavlogradmrada.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.