Всё сам!
👍44🤮3❤1👎1🤔1
Signed Pavel Sviridov

Channel
@pavelsviridov1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,729subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001284248839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pavelsviridov1 |
| Created | 4 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pavelsviridov1 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 4,729 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 4,730 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 4,735 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:13 | 4,736 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 4,739 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 4,745 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 4,747 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 4,753 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 4,757 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 4,759 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 4,769 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 4,778 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 4,779 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 4,779 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,265 reactions across 23 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 417 | 33.0% | |
| 🔥 | 338 | 26.7% | |
| ❤ | 120 | 9.49% | |
| 🤯 | 88 | 6.96% | |
| 🤔 | 82 | 6.48% | |
| 😁 | 68 | 5.38% | |
| 👎 | 48 | 3.79% | |
| 😱 | 45 | 3.56% | |
| 🤮 | 21 | 1.66% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 1.58% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 1.26% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.158% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всё сам!
👍44🤮3❤1👎1🤔1
Signed Pavel Sviridov
https://t.me/RusskijSoyuz/18282 ...Пир во время голода Часть II Осенью 1932 года в разгар очередного спровоцированного страшного Голода в распределителе в "Доме на набережной" прикрепленные лица ежемесячно получали по четыре килограмма мяса, четыре килограмма колбасы и ветчины, килограмму икры. В сентябре для питания делегатов пленума ЦК были затребованы 10 тонн мясных деликатесов, четыре тонны рыбы, 600 килограммо…
🤔10👏3❤2👎2🤯1
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Побег из "песочницы" Лаборатории OpenAI, Anthropic и Meta признали: во время тестов их модели совершили автономные взломы и проникновения во внешние системы. Исследования сместились — ученые проверяют уже не умение ИИ отвечать на вопросы, а способность действовать как независимый агент. Может ли ИИ «сбежать» из песочницы? Ему не нужно переносить сотни гигабайт своей модели. Гораздо проще перенести код, архитектуру и…
😱25🔥12👍7❤3
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Сгоревшие на WB товары селлеры обнаружили на Алиэкспресс с теми же карточками и даже отзывами. Получается, что товары вывезли до... А потом не разрешали вывозить уцелевшее. В новой редакции оферты крупным почерком что WB не несет ответственности в случае пожаров из-за военных действий, а вот мелким, что маркетплейс волен распоряжаться товаром как хочет и, естественно, никакой компенсации. Очередное кидалово, скольк…
🤯28🔥16🤔13😢8👏3👍2❤1
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Пентагон подтвердил переход от разговоров к делу: F-16 и F-15E, выделяемые НАТО для операций в Европе, сокращаются со 150 до 100 машин, самолёты-заправщики выводятся из эксплуатации полностью — это первый за долгое время реальный, а не декларативный шаг США по снижению военных обязательств на континенте. — По данным Bloomberg, обсуждение сокращения американских ресурсов идёт уже на уровне штабов НАТО: под вопросом ок…
👍10❤4🔥2
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Posted without readable text
🔥27👍12❤7🤔5👏1
Signed Pavel Sviridov
В финансовом блоке правительства обсуждают истинную подоплеку надвигающегося коллапса Wildberries. По данным наших источников, удары БПЛА по мегаскладам стали лишь удобной аппаратной ширмой для сокрытия катастрофической финансовой дыры, образовавшейся в объединенной компании «РВБ» задолго до атак. Кризис ликвидности начался еще весной 2026 года, о чем свидетельствуют массовые невыплаты селлерам, жесткие предупрежден…
👍17🤔13❤9😢3😁1
Signed Pavel Sviridov
https://pavel-sviridov.livejournal.com/583860.html
❤9👍2🤮2🤔1
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Вселенная — не кубик Рубика, но обоим нужен код для сборки Представьте человека, который держит в руках хаотично разобранный кубик Рубика. Каковы шансы, что, просто беспорядочно крутя его грани с закрытыми глазами, он случайно соберет идеальный рисунок — где каждая из шести граней окажется своего цвета? Математика комбинаторики дает жесткий ответ: у стандартного кубика 3 \times 3 \times 3 существует 43 квинтиллиона в…
👍31🔥19❤10🤔6🤮3👏2
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Роль Наблюдателя: Сознание как Терминал Считывания Физика квантового мира давно уперлась в роль Наблюдателя. Двухщелевой эксперимент и коллапс волновой функции наглядно демонстрируют: пока нет измерения (считывания), система находится в состоянии потенциальных волн вероятностей. Она существует как чистая информация. Сознание — это не просто биологический глаз или сетчатка. Органы чувств и приборы — это лишь внешняя п…
👍41🔥25❤4🤮4🤔2👏1
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Отрывок из книги Павла Свиридова "Взлом Программы": Как глушат приёмник: инфодинамика шума Если мозг — приёмник, то вопрос об управлении людьми приобретает принципиально иное измерение. Контролировать поведение можно не только силой и деньгами. Можно контролировать настройку канала. Именно это и происходит. Причём не случайно. Агрессивный, хаотичный, тревожный контент средств массовой информации выполняет функцию гл…
🔥67👍35❤12🤮1😢1
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Photo, posted without a caption
👍25🔥10🤔6👏4🤮2
Signed Pavel Sviridov
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @pavelsviridov1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pavel Sviridov” (@pavelsviridov1), 4,729 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pavelsviridov1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.