4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,668–3,670 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 22:45
3,670
+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:24
3,669
+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:00
3,668
no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:49
3,668
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 3,670 subscribers
Avg views / post
876
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (25 December 2024 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
876
Reactions total
31
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
727 reactions across 16 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
286
39.3%
❤
197
27.1%
👍
128
17.6%
🏆
22
3.03%
🤡
19
2.61%
😁
14
1.93%
😎
12
1.65%
🐳
5
0.688%
👏
5
0.688%
🤮
5
0.688%
💩
4
0.55%
🤔
4
0.55%
🥱
4
0.55%
🆒
3
0.413%
🤝
3
0.413%
🤣
3
0.413%
👨💻
2
0.275%
🗿
2
0.275%
🤩
2
0.275%
🥰
2
0.275%
5 further kinds
5
0.688%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 727reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 16 we hold a reading for · 63%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pathsecure. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 December 2024 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Стараюсь не отставать от трендов и качаюсь в направлении ИИшницы. Есть такие мысли, что стандартные пентесты и анализы защищенности скоро умрут как класс, а те, кто не приспособятся, вылетят с рынка.
Поэтому одним глазом смотрю в сторону пентест-агентов, а вторым глазом в сторону безопасности самих агентских систем. Третьим глазом продолжаю смотреть в классические направления пентеста (скоро сдаю экзамен OSEP), четв…
Всем привет!
Рынок найма сломан, поэтому решили пойти в эксперимент с сарафанным радио в телеге. Базовый найм через hh показал свою неэффективность.
Если вам или вашим знакомым интересно, то прошу откликнуться по контактам ниже :)
- - -
ИЩЕМ в команду пентестера внутрянки (Middle / Middle+).
🤝 Мы РАД КОП - первый в мире производственный кооператив в сфере ИБ. Приглашаем в команду пентестера, который устал от бюрок…
Хей!
Пост немного задержался...
Но я принес вам Хабр-статью с моей рефлексией по итогам сдачи OSWE!
Поделился своими мыслями и тактиками.
https://habr.com/ru/articles/1024100/
- - -
А я в ближайшие дни стартую новое приключение в сдачу OSEP 😎
#oswe #habr #education #cert
Всем привет!
Сегодня пришло сообщение об успешной сдаче CRTP!
Начал решать в середине января, как промежуточный период перед OSEP. Хороший экзамен, правда хороший. Сутки на активную часть и два дня на написание отчета. В содержании курса рассматриваются исключительно ADшные атаки, то есть этот курс можно считать базовым для виндового внутрянщика.
И что еще интересно: эксплуатация происходит с винды :) Да, последни…
Приветы!
Завтра буду вести вебинар про пассивную разведку.
https://t.me/radcop_online/351
В целом чего-то экстраординарного не будет. Расскажу про 10 техник сбора инфы о внешнем периметре Заказчика. Будет полезно админам, прогерам и начинающим ИБшникам :)
Возможно, смогу поделиться опытом и другими лучшими практиками в секции с вопросами. Увидимся!
хаха-хехе, всем привет!
Захотелось чуть-чуть поделиться мыслями в уходящем году.
Судя по статистике канала, в этом году было всего 12 постов, но ощущается, что это ок :)
Всему есть место и время. И канал продолжает преследовать изначальную цель - это личный блог, в котором я делюсь тем, что интересно лично мне. А последний год я активно интересуюсь "мягким и тонким" - софт скиллами. Последний год я достаточно плот…
🤨 Дождались!
Больше года с нетерпением ожидал новый список топовых уязвимостей от OWASP. Для веба они выходят раз в 3-4 года, начиная с 2003 года. В рейтинге десяти самых распространённых за 2025 год появились две новые категории и одна консолидированная.
▎ Новые топовые уязвимости:
➡️A03:2025 — Ошибки в цепочке поставок ПО (Software Supply Chain Failures). Расширяет прежний пункт Vulnerable and Outdated Componen…
Postgres 1C для пентеста
При внутреннем или внешнем пентесте компаний можно обнаружить сервис 1С. Этот продукт зачастую используется для финансового или управленческого учета. При сценарии внутреннего тестирования вам может посчастливиться достучаться до порта 1541/TCP (порт кластера 1С), а если повезет еще больше, то вход в кластер не будет защищен паролем и это может привести к удаленному выполнению кода (RCE).
Э…
Завтра буду вести с товарищами методологический вебинар про безопасность и пентесты в целом:
https://t.me/radcop_online/291
Расскажу системно в связке с тайм-менеджментом. Еще будет несколько кейсов из проектов, но без упора на технические детали.
Основная целевая аудитория - это ЛПР и собственники бизнесов, а не технари.
Но если вам интересно послушать, то велком. Всем хорошего дня!
Привет-привет!
Ищу к нам в команду опытного специалиста для самостоятельного выполнения проектов по пентесту внешки/внутрянки. Для некоторых самоуправление является бременем, а для кого-то благодатью. Если интересно, то откликайтесь!
Вот здесь немного о том, в какой парадигме мы живем:
https://t.me/pathsecure/370
Далее заголовок вакансии:
Мы —первый в России производственный кооператив в сфере ИБ, где нет бюрок…
Итак, три месяца подписки пролетели незаметно. Я прошел весь материал курса и прорешал с конспектированием почти все лабы (кроме двух). Какими же выводами я могу поделиться:
TLDR:
1) Лабы хорошие;
2) Материал хороший;
3) Хронометраж важен и полезен;
4) Жестко выделяйте время на обучение;
5) Ведите свой конспект;
6) Подготовьтесь перед тем, как взять курс.
- - -
1) Лабы реально годные. В комментариях под прошлым по…
❤40🔥14👍6🤣1😱1
Signed CuriV
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pathsecure. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 361,915 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Path Secure” (@pathsecure), 3,670 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pathsecure.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
