goblin box 🔪 Pathfinder2e pinned «»

Channel
goblin box 🔪 Pathfinder2e
@pathgoblin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,337subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001687572594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pathgoblin |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pathgoblin |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 1,337 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 1,336 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 1,331 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 1,329 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 1,329 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 38.9%
- avg views ÷ 1,337 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 520
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.15%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (30 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,602 |
| Reactions total | 134 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
238 reactions across 10 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 62 | 26.1% | |
| ❤ | 48 | 20.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5264792356208523345 | 23 | 9.66% | |
| 💋 | 17 | 7.14% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 6.72% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 5.88% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5273853212489693920 | 6 | 2.52% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.68% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 1.68% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 1.26% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
❤12❤🔥3👍2🔥2⚡1
сегодня вечером расскажу про жилище еще одного лорного персонажа из "Споровой войны"! там будет клевая палатка-полевая-алхимическая-лаборатория, которую вы сможете утащить в свои игры 🧪 а пока ласково напомню оставить реакцию под постом выше 🤩
💋10🔥6custom 52738532124896939204🫡1custom 52647923562085233451
goblin box 🔪 Pathfinder2e pinned a photo
Posted without readable text
🔥23❤🔥10⚡6❤3🦄1
На связи Вика — сегодня хочется поговорить про эльфийских персонажей и их эльфийские дома 🫐 Сейчас из-за чрезмерного загруза на работе и в жизни времени и сил на контент для канала у меня катастрофически не хватает — но в ПФ мы, конечно, все ещё играем, и моя гиперфиксация на голарионских эльфах, конечно, никуда не делась. Поэтому контент для канала я продолжу создавать из этой гиперфиксации. Некоторое время назад,…
❤8👀6👍4custom 52738532124896939201
goblin box 🔪 Pathfinder2e pinned a photo
Невозможная магия здесь! Вместе с четырьмя новыми классами. Ну, как с новыми — с практически новыми. Сегодня рассмотрим полноценный релиз некроманта и рунсмита, а также ремастеры магуса и призывателя! Из этого выпуска вы узнаете: - Насколько отвратителен некромант? - Насколько надмозгный рунсмит? - Насколько Пайзо любит магуса? - Насколько Пайзо не любит призывателя? Из этого выпуска вы не узнаете: - Сколько раз в …
custom 526479235620852334513❤7⚡5❤🔥3💋1🔥1
Posted without readable text
🤔4❤3💋3🦄2👍1
goblin box 🔪 Pathfinder2e pinned «💥 Magus Remastered: Как один из сильнейших классов стал еще сильнее? Близится выход книги Impossible Magic, и потихоньку в комьюнити начинает просачиваться разная информация из нее. Сегодня поговорим о том, что стало с одним из моих любимых классов в пф1е/пф2е…»
— Подкласс Twofold Tine рассчитан на оружие в каждой руке. Когда вы бьете одним ударом, второе оружие получает дополнительный урон от каскада (2/4/6), то есть, усиливается в два раза. Конфлюкс-спелл достаточно необычный — от дуал-магуса ожидаешь магического двойного страйка, но вместе этого делаешь один удар против цели в 15фт. Причем, если вы ее не атаковали в этом раунде, то получаете уменьшенный MAP (-4/-8, вместо…
🔥17❤🔥6❤3🫡2😱1custom 52738532124896939201
💥 Magus Remastered: Как один из сильнейших классов стал еще сильнее? Близится выход книги Impossible Magic, и потихоньку в комьюнити начинает просачиваться разная информация из нее. Сегодня поговорим о том, что стало с одним из моих любимых классов в пф1е/пф2е — магусом. Для начала немного вводных. Магус — это аркановый гиш (кто такие гиши, читайте здесь), который изначально вышел в книжке Secrets of Magic. Это слу…
🔥8❤🔥3😱2⚡1👀1💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @pathgoblin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 83,067 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pathgoblin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“goblin box 🔪 Pathfinder2e” (@pathgoblin), 1,337 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pathgoblin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.