Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

passmurny

@passmurny

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,698subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001480618037
TypeChannel
Username@passmurny
Created6 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/passmurny

Growth

3,6983,7153,706.56 August 2026 — 3,714 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,715 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,708 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,698 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,695–3,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:423,698-10
10 Aug 2026, 02:513,708-7
7 Aug 2026, 03:473,715+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:183,714first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.8%
avg views ÷ 3,698 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (12 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total20,413
Reactions total1,755
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,950 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519977061868113572887644.9%
custom 519970906750481873639320.2%
custom 519724574914173733038519.7%
custom 519981818973890717329615.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,950reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC433 views94 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

выпускаем финальное видео из этой серии надеемся на вашу поддержку ⛓️‍💥 https://youtu.be/rTQ2ARzNETk

custom 519977061868113572844custom 519970906750481873625custom 519981818973890717325

1 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC≈1,250 views135 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Давно не выступали под палящим солнцем Отдали всю жидкость из организма! Круто, что вы были с нами 🫂 До скорых встреч!

custom 519977061868113572885custom 519981818973890717333custom 519970906750481873617

31 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,100 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нижний Новгород! Мы уже у вас и ждём встречи завтра ⛓️‍💥 14:20–14:50 — выступление (Main Strelka) ПАРИ ФЕСТ

custom 519977061868113572841custom 519970906750481873612custom 519724574914173733011custom 51998181897389071732

28 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC≈1,550 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

23 августа назначаем вам встречу в Перми на фестивале Red Fest проводим лето громко 📍 Digital Port, Решетниковский спуск, 1щ

custom 519977061868113572842custom 519970906750481873620custom 51998181897389071739custom 51972457491417373307

25 Jul 2026, 20:50 UTC≈1,560 views143 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

ЧЕБОКСАРЫЫЫ большая любовь 🫵🖤 скидывайте в комментарии все что сняли и сфоткали!! как вам концерт? 👇🏼

custom 519977061868113572868custom 519970906750481873637custom 519724574914173733027custom 519981818973890717311

25 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,390 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

мерч до 19:30 мы ждём на сцене в 20:35

custom 519977061868113572847custom 519970906750481873624custom 519724574914173733021custom 51998181897389071737

25 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC≈1,270 views105 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

наставляют мерч на удачные продажи

custom 519724574914173733048custom 519977061868113572829custom 519970906750481873622custom 51998181897389071736

25 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC≈1,200 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

кажется, проголодался кушает пиццу

custom 519970906750481873647custom 519724574914173733024custom 519977061868113572822custom 51998181897389071736

25 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC≈1,180 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

выгуливаем мерч

custom 519970906750481873633custom 519724574914173733021custom 519981818973890717317custom 519977061868113572811

25 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,180 views116 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

мы все в сборе! и мерч тоже ;)

custom 519977061868113572868custom 519724574914173733025custom 519981818973890717321custom 51997090675048187362

23 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC≈1,420 views200 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

первая партия команды прибыла в чебоксары! погуляли, бильярд поиграли, пельмени покушали

custom 519981818973890717391custom 519977061868113572865custom 519724574914173733032custom 519970906750481873612

22 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,430 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

25 июля увидимся на фестивале Шевле а уже 1 августа встречаемся с вами на ПАРИ ФЕСТ будет красиво 🖤

custom 519977061868113572846custom 519724574914173733019custom 51997090675048187365custom 51998181897389071731

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @passmurny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 271,931 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“passmurny” (@passmurny), 3,698 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/passmurny.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.