Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Passcodes πŸ’›

@passcodes

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

4,063subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001098883828
TypeChannel
Username@passcodes
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 November 2017β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/passcodes

Growth

4,0634,0694,0666 August 2026 β€” 4,069 subscribers6 August 2026 β€” 4,069 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 4,065 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 4,063 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,062–4,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:284,063-2
9 Aug 2026, 17:024,065-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:184,069no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:294,069first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 January 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
39.9%
avg views Γ· 4,063 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 January 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total1,620
Reactions total37
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,007 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘52452.0%
πŸ‘Ž37036.7%
❀888.74%
😒131.29%
πŸ₯°121.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 1,007reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTCβ‰ˆ1,620 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

3ZQJ5W6USCGZSYT7NTA2DUGN41V

πŸ‘33❀4

Signed Lemange

13 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTCβ‰ˆ3,460 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 3ECT4NESTZ507E

πŸ‘Ž43πŸ‘20❀4

Signed Lemange

13 Jul 2026, 03:09 UTCβ‰ˆ2,740 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 0RDO3DRIFTX032T

πŸ‘Ž36πŸ‘15❀1😒1

Signed Lemange

13 Jul 2026, 02:51 UTCβ‰ˆ2,400 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 3PYP5BUILDR489F

πŸ‘Ž33πŸ‘13

Signed Lemange

6 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTCβ‰ˆ3,460 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 3dqk3arrivec907q

πŸ‘Ž44πŸ‘12❀1

Signed 芷沐.skill

6 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTCβ‰ˆ3,060 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

OO4II5Z22XTPVKDRA1AR3W42HNP

πŸ‘44πŸ₯°6πŸ‘Ž3

Signed Lemange

8 Jun 2026, 09:25 UTCβ‰ˆ4,940 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

UVEG9UI91GBR5890MUJA0B9KDMJ

πŸ‘67πŸ‘Ž4❀1

Signed Lemange

27 May 2026, 07:46 UTCβ‰ˆ4,920 views81 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 2jkv0discoveryy564f

πŸ‘Ž64πŸ‘13❀4

Signed Lemange

25 May 2026, 02:14 UTCβ‰ˆ4,220 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 5hqq9nemesisb249r

πŸ‘Ž47πŸ‘24❀1

Signed Lemange

24 May 2026, 16:04 UTCβ‰ˆ4,170 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 7wrp4dark470p 2brv4pattern054z

πŸ‘32πŸ‘Ž16😒7❀4

Signed Lemange

23 May 2026, 06:03 UTCβ‰ˆ4,670 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 6uda5covcoms653n 8xhy3capturev595b 3edx7messagen377q

πŸ‘Ž38❀12πŸ₯°3

Signed Lemange

23 May 2026, 05:39 UTCβ‰ˆ4,850 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#FR 8ygm8signalc543c 4tnq0chapeaux944k 8tng8shapem477g 3xvn3reportt375v 7uub9sitrept937q 4sec0operativey389h 8zyz4nagassay227q 6xdr2darke400h 2edc6controln045o

❀18πŸ‘Ž15πŸ‘6πŸ₯°3

Signed Lemange

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @passcodes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 445,632 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œPasscodes πŸ’›β€ (@passcodes), 4,063 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/passcodes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.