Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آموزش توسعه کسب و کار با پاسیو

Channel

آموزش توسعه کسب و کار با پاسیو

@pasiolead

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,040subscribers

-96 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001492438797
TypeChannel
Username@pasiolead
Description💚کانال رسمی آکادمی توسعه کسب و کار پاسیو💚 ‌‌‌‌ 🔴پیج اینستاگرام پاسیولید: https://instagram.com/pasiolead?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
CreatedBetween 1 June 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pasiolead

Growth

9,0409,1379,088.57 August 2026 — 9,136 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,136 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,137 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,113 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,092 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,087 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,067 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,049 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,040 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 21 days, net -96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,025–9,152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 13:549,040-9
25 Aug 2026, 03:239,049-18
21 Aug 2026, 23:589,067-20
18 Aug 2026, 22:599,087-5
15 Aug 2026, 18:369,092-21
11 Aug 2026, 21:529,113-24
8 Aug 2026, 14:069,137+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:009,136no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:559,136first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 25 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.45%
avg views ÷ 9,040 subscribers
Avg views / post
312
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.803%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held22 (25 February 202621 August 2026)
Views total623
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
212
Videos
167
Links
360

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1066.7%
🤩426.7%
🤔16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC267 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

چک لیست ۳ مرحله‌ای برای رشد پزشکان در سال ۱۴۰۵✅

1

21 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC356 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

این پرامپت رو کپی کن و اطلاعات کسب‌وکارت رو جایگزین کن 👇 «تو یک استراتژیست حرفه‌ای اینستاگرام، سناریونویس استوری و کپی‌رایتر فارسی‌زبان هستی. برای من یک سناریوی استوری طراحی کن که باعث حفظ ویو، ادامه‌دادن استوری‌ها و در نهایت ریپلای، اعتماد یا فروش شود. اطلاعات کسب‌وکار: حوزه فعالیت: [حوزه کاری] مخاطب هدف: [مخاطب دقیق] موضوع امروز: [موضوع استوری] هدف اصلی: [افزایش ویو / ریپلای / اعتمادسازی / جذب لید / فروش] محصول

4

26 Feb 2026, 19:45 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

📊 ⁉️ اگر بخوای از فردا محتوای پربازدید و پرفروش بسازی، اولین تمرکزت روی چی میره؟

  1. ساخت قلاب‌های قوی‌تر برای جذب ویو37%
  2. عمیق‌تر کردن محتوا برای افزایش اعتماد32%
  3. طراحی پل فروش حرفه‌ای داخل محتوا11%
  4. تحلیل رفتار مخاطب و داده‌های پیج21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Feb 2026, 19:30 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 28 August 2026

محتوای پربازدید ساختن هنر توجه گرفتنه محتوای پرفروش ساختن هنر اعتماد ساختنه هر دو رو با هم یاد بگیری دیگه نگران الگوریتم نیستی✅

26 Feb 2026, 19:15 UTC998 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ویو بالا بدون سیستم فروش می‌سوزه فروش زیاد بدون برند می‌ریزه ⁉️ سیستم یعنی چی؟ یعنی بدونی هر محتوا کجای مسیر مشتری قرار داره: آگاهی اعتماد تصمیم خرید

🤩4

26 Feb 2026, 19:04 UTC840 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

📊 الان محتوای پیجت بیشتر کدومه؟

  1. فقط جذب ویو17%
  2. فقط فروش44%
  3. ترکیبی ولی نامنظم28%
  4. استراتژی مشخص دارم11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

26 Feb 2026, 18:45 UTC766 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

اصول فروش هدفمند 🔴 بدونی کی آماده خرید است نه اینکه همه فالوورها رو خریدار بدونی 🔴 مشکل رو واضح‌تر از خودش توضیح بدی تا بگه: «دقیقاً همین!» 🔴 راه‌حل رو منطقی ارائه بدی نه هیجانی 🔴 و مهم‌تر از همه ریسک ذهنی خرید رو کم کنی

1

26 Feb 2026, 18:31 UTC706 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

قدم سوم | پل فروش اینجا اشتباه اصلی اتفاق میفته‼️ یا پیشنهاد نمی‌دن یا یهویی فشار میارن 💠 فروش هدفمند یعنی: مخاطب حس کنه «این دقیقاً برای منه» نه اینکه همه رو صدا بزنی

2

26 Feb 2026, 18:16 UTC565 viewsread 28 August 2026

قدم دوم | عمق واقعی (برای اعتماد) اینجاست که خیلیا می‌برن. اطلاعات سطحی نکات تکراری حرف‌های کلی مخاطب امروز ساده نیست یا باید تجربه واقعی بدی یا تحلیل جدی یا جزئیات کاربردی وگرنه فقط دیده میشی… نه خریده❌

26 Feb 2026, 18:03 UTC516 viewsread 28 August 2026

قدم اول | قلاب درست (برای ویو) ۳ ثانیه اول تعیین می‌کنه اسکرول میشه یا نه‼️ سؤال چالشی باور اشتباه عدد دقیق یا یه جمله غیرمنتظره ولی حواست باشه… قلاب زرد = ویو موقتی قلاب هوشمند = مخاطب هدف

26 Feb 2026, 17:45 UTC504 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

⁉️ وقتی ویو بالا میره ولی فروش نمیاد، چی فکر می‌کنی؟

  1. الگوریتم مقصره10%
  2. قیمت بالاست10%
  3. مخاطب هدف نیست70%
  4. نمی‌دونم مشکل کجاست10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Feb 2026, 17:32 UTC477 viewsread 28 August 2026

💠 اول یه واقعیت: محتوای پربازدید = جذب توجه محتوای پرفروش = جذب اعتماد اگر فقط دنبال توجه باشی عددت بالا میره پولت نه اگر فقط دنبال فروش باشی رشدت کند میشه بیزینس حرفه‌ای این دوتارو ترکیب می‌کنه✅

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @pasiolead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Feb 2026, 19:45 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

📊 ⁉️ اگر بخوای از فردا محتوای پربازدید و پرفروش بسازی، اولین تمرکزت روی چی میره؟

  1. ساخت قلاب‌های قوی‌تر برای جذب ویو37%
  2. عمیق‌تر کردن محتوا برای افزایش اعتماد32%
  3. طراحی پل فروش حرفه‌ای داخل محتوا11%
  4. تحلیل رفتار مخاطب و داده‌های پیج21%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Feb 2026, 19:04 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

📊 الان محتوای پیجت بیشتر کدومه؟

  1. فقط جذب ویو17%
  2. فقط فروش44%
  3. ترکیبی ولی نامنظم28%
  4. استراتژی مشخص دارم11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Feb 2026, 17:45 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

⁉️ وقتی ویو بالا میره ولی فروش نمیاد، چی فکر می‌کنی؟

  1. الگوریتم مقصره10%
  2. قیمت بالاست10%
  3. مخاطب هدف نیست70%
  4. نمی‌دونم مشکل کجاست10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Feb 2026, 19:47 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

📊 ⁉️ اگر بخوای پیجتو حرفه‌ای اداره کنی، اولین تمرکزت روی چی میره؟

  1. 1️⃣تعیین استراتژی دقیق محتوا44%
  2. 2️⃣ساخت ستون‌های منظم و هدفمند19%
  3. 3️⃣تقویت برند شخصی و هویت پیج19%
  4. 4️⃣یادگیری فروش از طریق محتوا19%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Feb 2026, 18:31 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

⁉️ بیشتر مشکل فروش تو کجاست؟

  1. اعتماد کم مخاطب50%
  2. پیشنهاد ضعیف13%
  3. قیمت0%
  4. اصلاً استراتژی ندارم38%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 834,033 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش توسعه کسب و کار با پاسیو” (@pasiolead), 9,040 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pasiolead.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.