8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,324–15,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 09:03
15,330
-5
12 Aug 2026, 12:26
15,335
+1
11 Aug 2026, 11:29
15,334
+7
10 Aug 2026, 14:31
15,327
-12
9 Aug 2026, 15:16
15,339
-7
8 Aug 2026, 18:04
15,346
-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:00
15,347
-2
7 Aug 2026, 07:45
15,349
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 15,330 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,710
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
22 (31 May 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
33,420
Reactions total
922
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,492 reactions across 22 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
615
41.2%
🔥
474
31.8%
👍
146
9.79%
❤🔥
132
8.85%
😁
79
5.29%
👏
21
1.41%
😍
12
0.804%
🎉
7
0.469%
🐳
3
0.201%
🤩
3
0.201%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,492reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 22 we hold a reading for · 68%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pashu_sd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ребят, всем привет!
Я к вам с новостью.
Многие здесь знают, что я попечитель Международной школы бизнеса «Горки». Концепция школы мощная: мы с основателями топ-компаний передаем предпринимателям свой реальный опыт – ровно те инструменты, которые нам самим помогли вырасти.
Сейчас в «Горках» выдаем гранты от 100 тыс. до 1 млн рублей. Эту сумму можно потратить на обучение.
На кого смотрим:
•Женщины-предприниматели —…
В очередной раз смотрел как солнце садится за горизонт, загадывал желание, как и 20 лет назад! Планета так быстро вращается и все так быстро летит…пшик и уже 10/20/30 лет пробежали! Тормозить время можно, только проживая каждый день, и напоминая себе об этом! Любить то, что делаешь, чтобы каждый день был наполнен смыслом и любовью! Окружать себя людьми, от встречи с которыми остаются только долгие хорошие воспоминани…
Исключения есть всегда, в любой области!
Но в общем, никто не полетит по прямой, даже если цель определена и определена правильно, если:
- Человек не дисциплинирован ☝️
Это значит, у него нет своей долгосрочной системы координат. Он не отслеживает, что у него получается лучше, чем у остальных, не проверяет себя в деле и не усиливает то, что уже сильно. А без этого сильные стороны так и остаются случайностью, котора…
Продолжаем вечерние зарисовки!
Прочитал интересную цитату и интересно развернулась мысль!
С одной стороны очевидно, с другой нет! Тк если бы было очевидно для всех, то все были бы заряженными по всем сферам и укомплектованные!
Но это не так и даже те, у кого сферы заполненные, то не все и не на полную!
Вот цитата👇
«То, во что вы целитесь, определяет то, что вы видите.»
Большая часть людей не видит ничего, тк см…
Продолжаю читать, приходят разные мысли, которые зажигают много маленьких фанариков внутри, воскрешают какие-то потухшие мысли, какие-то загораются вновь. Много интересного встаёт в свои пазлы.
Решил написать одну из мыслей по вчерашней теме 👇
Много раз видел и на себе и на других людях, имея цель, не для красивого словца, а бурлящую изнутри, люди двигали горы и пробивали огромные заслоны на пути к ней. И достигали…
Наверное, самое большое кол-во вопросов на выступлениях и в директе от людей: откуда брать мотивацию и силы, когда кажется что уже нет сил.
Мне сложно возвращаться в свои 20/25, когда не было базы и всё строилось с нуля, тк тогда для нас это было больше игрой и некой Американской мечтой но в России!
Но совершенно точно я помню все сложности и преграды за последние 15 лет, которые были более сложные и эмоционально неп…
Слушаю активно книгу. Есть много воды для иллюстрации и заполнения книги, но суть очень чёткая. В некоторых цитатах и отсылках к легендарным авторам в паре фраз закрываются гигантские бреши понимания причин и следствия. Как человеческой души и повеления людей, так большого спектра других вопросов!
Было бы больше времени в юности на чтение, было бы меньше ошибок и разочарований) ☝️
С другой стороны, теория без прак…
Случайно ко мне попала книга Джордана Питерсона «12 правил жизни. Противоядие от хаоса»
Интересная. Решил поделиться.
Вот несколько ключевых правил:
1 - Стойте прямо и расправьте плечи — поведение влияет на психологическое состояние и на то, как вас воспринимают окружающие.
2 - Относитесь к себе так, как относились бы к человеку, которому хотите помочь — многие заботятся о других лучше, чем о себе.
3 - Дружите с лю…
Делюсь интересными тех новостями за вчера! Многое вы услышите впервые 👌
Слушайте на скорости 1,5
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @pashu_sd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,047,844 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Совет Директоров с Пашу” (@pashu_sd), 15,330 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pashu_sd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
