УБRАТЬ ПУТИНА ЛЮБЫМ ПУТЕМ! В РОССИИ ОСТАЛИСЬ ТЕ, КТО НЕ БОИТСЯ!  ВОТ ПРАВДА
👍4

Channel
@partisanyzarodinu1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,528subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001897234694 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @partisanyzarodinu1 |
| Created | 6 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/partisanyzarodinu1 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 2,528 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 2,522 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 2,521 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 2,519 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 2,521 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 2,523 | +13 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 2,510 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 2,515 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 2,517 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 2,519 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 2,516 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:10 | 2,508 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 2,508 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 35 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
77 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 29 | 37.7% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 18.2% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 18.2% | |
| 🤬 | 14 | 18.2% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.60% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
УБRАТЬ ПУТИНА ЛЮБЫМ ПУТЕМ! В РОССИИ ОСТАЛИСЬ ТЕ, КТО НЕ БОИТСЯ!  ВОТ ПРАВДА
👍4
kinomax.01.07.2026 «Йеллоустоун» (Yellowstone, 2018-2024) * Рейтинг: IMDb: 8.6 | Кинопоиск: 8.6 Жанр: Неовестерн, драма Описание: Семья Даттон владеет крупнейшим ранчо в Монтане, которое граничит с национальным парком Йеллоустоун, индейской резервацией и территориями агрессивных застройщиков. Глава семейства Джон Даттон всеми силами пытается сохранить земли своих предков от посягательств со всех сторон. В ход идут п…
live.clever90 Он курил 20 лет. Сначала сигареты, потом айкос. В 38 лет — инфаркт. Бросил за один день. Я спросила: что было самым сложным? Он ответил: осознать, что я сам довёл себя до больничной койки. Это не сила воли, это выбор между жизнью и смертью. Его совет: не ждите своего инфаркта. Посмотрите на цифры — сколько лет, сколько стиков. И спросите себя: хотите, чтобы эти цифры росли? #броситькурить #история #зож…
pressax_ru Видеохостинг YouTube заблокировал канал организации «Русская община». Представители объединения заявили, что точные причины удаления им не сообщались. Ранее деятельность сообщества неоднократно подвергалась критике из-за публикаций, которые вызывали обвинения в разжигании межнациональной напряжённости. @pressax_ru #PressaX
hronikaplanet HAARP — это сверхмощное геофизическое и климатическое оружие, замаскированное под гражданскую научную станцию на Аляске. Принцип его действия основан на нагреве ионосферы Земли сфокусированными пучками радиоволн высокой мощности. Создавая в атмосфере гигантские электромагнитные «линзы», комплекс способен искусственно изменять траекторию воздушных масс, провоцируя на территории противника разрушительные …
artursolomonov7 “Я обращаюсь во всем убоюдк.м, которые ждут когда цели СВО будут достигнуты: все, кто хочет этой войны, идите и умрите там». «Проклинаю тех, кто это развязал и еще более тех, кто берет в руки оружие и идет убивать людей». Обращение женщины из небольшого поселка в РФ, живущей за 100 километров от границы с Украиной. Есть показательный момент, когда она обвиняет в продолжении войны неких «двух людей»…
👍3🔥1
suetolog2026 Эта Шутка Зашла СЛИШКОМ Далеко..🤯 Сериал: Охота на гауляйтера (2012-2013) 12+ Кинопоиск 7,3 из 10 Краткая информация Минск 1970 год. Торжественное заседание посвященное награждению комсомола Белорусской ССР орденом Ленина. В президиуме на почетном месте пожилая женщина. Это герой Великой Отечественной войны – Мария Архипова. Открыть собрание предоставляется еще одному почетному гостю, Герою Советско…
ПАМФИЛОВА НАЧАЛА ЗАИКАТЬСЯ! ДУRA ЧТО ТЫ НЕСЕШЬ!  ВОТ ПРАВДА
👍3
postorlov На всякий случай
roman.bulhashev
👍2
m0stmedia Почему распад России сегодня выглядит невозможным? Выступая в Казани 6 августа 1990 года, глава Верховного Совета РСФСР Борис Ельцин произнёс хрестоматийную фразу: «Берите столько суверенитета, сколько сможете проглотить» (в тот же день он повторил этот тезис на митинге в Уфе). Тогда, на исходе Перестройки, Верховные советы всех союзных и автономных республик СССР провозгласили свой государственный сувер…
👎2❤1
altn.news ИСТОРИЧЕСКАЯ ОЦЕНКА ИДЕОЛОГИИ СИОНИЗМА МЫСЛИ НАРОДА ВСЛУХ В видео российская писательница, востоковед и историк Мария Кича высказывает свою оценку раннего сионистского движения и взглядов его лидеров. По мнению автора, распространённое представление о принципиальном различии между ранними левыми сионистскими лидерами и современными правыми политиками Израиля не соответствует исторической действительности.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @partisanyzarodinu1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@partisanyzarodinu1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Партизаны за Родину” (@partisanyzarodinu1), 2,528 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/partisanyzarodinu1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.