Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for partially unsupervised

Channel

partially unsupervised

@partially_unsupervised

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,437subscribers

+539 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001336524648
TypeChannel
Username@partially_unsupervised
Created24 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/partially_unsupervised

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,89810,43710,167.56 August 2026 — 9,898 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,899 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,906 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,913 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,912 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,175 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,196 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,216 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,234 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,233 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,235 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,242 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,243 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,245 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,247 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,246 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,251 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,259 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,276 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,283 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,292 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,296 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,297 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,437 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 50 days, net +539. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,817–10,518 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 05:3710,437+140
18 Sept 2026, 18:5510,297+1
14 Sept 2026, 19:1910,296+4
13 Sept 2026, 04:5710,292+9
11 Sept 2026, 09:4010,283+7
8 Sept 2026, 14:3810,276+17
5 Sept 2026, 06:1710,259+8
3 Sept 2026, 07:5710,251+5
2 Sept 2026, 05:0410,246-1
1 Sept 2026, 01:3410,247+2
30 Aug 2026, 22:3610,245+2
29 Aug 2026, 20:3410,243+1
28 Aug 2026, 01:0210,242+5
27 Aug 2026, 04:0410,237+2
26 Aug 2026, 01:1410,235+2
25 Aug 2026, 04:1510,233-1
24 Aug 2026, 03:1810,234+18
22 Aug 2026, 11:3510,216+20
20 Aug 2026, 23:3310,196+21
19 Aug 2026, 22:2410,175first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,256 reactions across 22 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤69230.7%
😁51222.7%
👍37916.8%
🔥25611.3%
🤣924.08%
🤝783.46%
🤡552.44%
💯512.26%
💩241.06%
🕊190.842%
🫡180.798%
👀150.665%
🐳130.576%
👎130.576%
🌚80.355%
✍50.222%
👏50.222%
😨40.177%
⚡30.133%
💔30.133%
6 further kinds110.488%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
150
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 22 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
130
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @partially_unsupervised. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,420 views78 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026

Мой соавтор по первой книжке не удержался и недавно заспойлерил вторую. А если шило в мешке не утаить, то надо идти в обратную сторону, и начать собирать предзаказы. Оставляйте свои почты, но главное - пожелания, какие темы мы должны покрыть для дорогих подписчиков.

👍33🤡28💩6❤3🔥3🤮3👎1🫡1

9 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC≈7,980 views328 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Когда я учился в школе, на каком-то этапе мои учителя математики и информатики объявили, что у меня полное отсутствие таланта к соответствующим дисциплинам, и хороших оценок по ним мне не видать. Так я отделался от судьбы отличника-медалиста, подзабил на учебу и примерно в десятом классе начал подрабатывать протоблогером - писать про канплюктеры в тогда еще бумажные газеты. Заметные деньги по тем временам, да еще и б…

❤176😁114🔥25✍5💔3💯3👍2

28 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC≈8,810 views183 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Четыре недели плотно работал над нечетко поставленной задачей на грани агентов и information flow, причем это само это словосочетание для меня было в новинку. Артефакт покажу позже, когда ревьювер номер два напихает в панамку, а пока буду ныть. Даже будучи адептом AI-assisted программирования со времен беты копайлота и пользователем клодкода с первого паблик релиза, я дошел до желания забиндить YOU FUCKING MORON на …

😁83💯45❤40👍9🤝4😨2

17 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC≈9,000 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Точно знаю, что у меня много читателей в Лондоне 🇬🇧 и Варшаве 🇵🇱 - вот AI тусовки для вас: AI Agents in Production — Rooftop Drinks (Лондон, 4 августа) Меня там не будет, потому что я быдло чумазое невыездной в ожидании ПМЖ. Зато там будут мои коллеги, разговоры про харнессы и бесплатное бухло. The AI Black Swan (Варшава, 26 июля). За пафосным названием обещаются разговоры про агентов и особенно память для них, ну …

❤28😁4👍1

13 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC≈10,600 views126 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Давеча мне предложили немного денег за рекламу курса по AI-driven разработке 💸. Вахтер внутри меня победил безрассудного жадину, так что я взял слайды у рекламодателей и отдал агентам на ревью. Агенты быстро пришли к консенсусу и оценили контент на 7-8 из 10. Похвалили за честность (без хайпа и обещания золотых гор) и практичность, пожурили за неоригинальность. Уникального контента внутри действительно немного, но з…

🤣68🕊19🤡11🌚8❤7👍7🔥5👎1

5 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC≈42,800 views142 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Давние читатели канала помнят, что когда-то в древние времена мы с Валерой написали книжку про ML design. Это было так давно, что люди тогда умели не только читать по диагонали, но еще иногда писать, а книги были значимым артефактом для упаковки знаний. С тех пор утекло немало воды, работу делают агенты, и книгам они предпочитают скиллы. И вот мы с клодом наконец добрались перепаковать одно в другое: ML system desig…

❤88🔥37💩6🤡6😁3👍2

23 Jun 2026, 19:32 UTC≈20,200 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026

☭ https://sovietrxiv.org ☭ Самое время идти к VC с питчем: "Ивахненко и Вапник - два моих деда, нашел их записные книжки на даче, дайте миллиард"

👍27🤣12❤8🔥4

22 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC≈9,990 views37 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Самая недохайпованная AI лаба тоже верит в будущее за оркестрацией доступных моделей. Frontier-level performance without single-vendor dependency. > Our Fugu models surpass publicly accessible frontier models and are shoulder-to-shoulder with Fable 5 and Mythos Preview in various rigorous engineering, scientific, and reasoning benchmarks while delivering frontier capability without the risk of export controls. Как …

❤24👍10🔥2😁1

15 Jun 2026, 07:45 UTC≈11,100 views90 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

История с закрытием доступа к Fable - повод тянуться за шампанским в офисах провайдеров открытых моделей. Каждый executive, который участвовал во внедрении AI в своей организации (т.е. просто каждый executive), резко задумался: "А что и кому они внезапно отключат в следующий раз?". Все страхи про вендорлок материализовались мгновенно, даже если конкретно в этой компании Fable и не начали использовать, да и не планиро…

👍53❤23🔥9😁3🐳1💯1

2 Jun 2026, 11:27 UTC≈8,890 views108 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Личный карьерный апдейт: третью неделю работаю в archestra.ai, моя задача - тащить современный агентский слой в широком смысле слова. Иными словами, вернулся к позиции "писать в меру экспериментальный опенсорс за деньги". Снова работать в команде из семи человек после недолгого захода в бигтех - кайф. Archestra - security-first инфра платформа для агентов. Запустить openclaw-like агента локально несложно, особенно в…

🔥76❤24👎5👏3

14 May 2026, 15:27 UTC≈10,400 views35 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Многие из вас видели заголовок Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged или, возможно, читали пересказы в популярных каналах (1, 2). Это сделанный агентом PR на 1 млн строк. Такие масштабы от меня далеки, но с похожими штуками я недавно ковырялся. Далеки - это в данном случае два порядка: получалось добиться успешной трансляции Typescript => Rust на 10к строк. Мои условия были в чем-то сложнее, чем в истории с Bun: тесто…

❤28🤝4💩2👍1

9 May 2026, 20:46 UTC≈10,800 views101 reactions12 Starsread 29 August 2026

Наблюдая одним глазом за внедрением кодинг агентов на разных уровнях в разных компаниях, я не могу ответить на один вопрос: зачем топ-менеджеры поддерживают (а иногда и форсят) политику, что менеджеры теперь всерьез должны коммитить код. Не тимлиды, а настоящие менеджеры менеджеров, часто директора и выше. Не только прототипы на коленке, но и прямо в основные репозитории. На реддите воют, что такие директорские пулл…

👍80❤17😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @partially_unsupervised. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@partially_unsupervised edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

gonzo-обзоры ML статей
@gonzo_ML · 24,323
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
Время Валеры
@cryptovalerii · 30,808
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
LLM под капотом
@llm_under_hood · 29,146
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
эйай ньюз
@ai_newz · 96,889
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
Сиолошная
@seeallochnaya · 79,594
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
Dev & ML Connectable Jobs
@dev_connectablejobs · 27,959
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Data Science Jobs
@datasciencejobs · 22,137
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“partially unsupervised” (@partially_unsupervised), 10,437 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/partially_unsupervised.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.