need fast payment eh yg ni

Channel
Parkz Cart
@parkzcart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
105subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002152133241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @parkzcart |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/parkzcart |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 105 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 104 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 102 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 102 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 55.5%
- avg views ÷ 105 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 58.3
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.04%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 699 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#Parkzpayment_notice #Parkz_LP16 tripleS Love&Pop pt. 1 Kmonstar 260813 online fancall RM 25 each @thau9930 S1 S4 @skykizuna S6 @iambinnie97 S14 @aikkai320 S16 @raizo_13 S17 @kwaklution S12 S24 + 8 random 🖇️ Exc ems and local postage 🖇️ Don't forget to put your username on reference and send the payment proof here 🖇️ Please make payment before 7th August 2pm
update availability
Hi, sorry for disturbing you guys this late. I just want to update you on my current situation. I'm not saying this to use it as an excuse for giving you bad service or to make you pity me. I just want to ask for your understanding. Currently, I'm busy with my attachment intern which started immediately after my exams. Literally I started my internship two days after my last paper, so I really haven't had enough res…
❤6
left with jiwoo, dahyun, sohyun, seoah for first slot
helping my friend, mari2
260813 kmonstar video call event RM25 (pob + oma) seoyeon ❌✅ jiwoo ✅✅ *chaeyeon ❌✅ soomin ❌✅ kaede ❌✅ dahyun ✅✅ yeonji ❌✅ sohyun ❌✅ *mayu ❌✅ lynn ❌✅ *seoah ✅✅ jiyeon ❌✅ ❗️seoyeon, sohyun prio tie w *members ❗️proceed if at least one set taken ❗️if i win, a raffle for a sealed photobook album, a sealed oma, and a random objekt from cosmo shop will commence (the more you buy, the more entries you get) ❗️ free ems if …
.... memang semua keluar today
some of the preview
WTS Badge War x 1theK badge loose RM 32 each (1 badge + 1 random postcard) RM 350 per season season 1 (strong girl) 1 ❌ 2✅ 3✅ 4❌ 5✅ 6✅ 7❌ 8✅ 9✅ 10❌ 11❌ season 2 (girls never die) 1❌ 2✅ 3✅ 4✅ 5✅ 6✅ 7✅ 8✅ 9✅ 10❌ 11❌ season 3 (no badge no power) 1❌ 2✅ 3✅ 4✅ 5✅ 6✅ 7✅ 8✅ 9✅ 10❌ season 4 (trust no one) 1❌ 2❌ 3❌ 4✅ 5✅ 6✅ 7✅ 8✅ 9❌ 10✅ 11❌ ❌season 2 set ❌all season set 💸 accept MY bank / wise / paypal ☀️ need all taken…
preview at 5.30
if more taken, will get free shipping so can get cheaper
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @parkzcart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Parkz Cart” (@parkzcart), 105 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parkzcart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.