3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,826–6,851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 18:21
6,829
-19
7 Aug 2026, 10:00
6,848
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:15
6,848
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
59.9%
avg views ÷ 6,829 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,090
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
21 (14 May 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
40,930
Reactions total
529
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,860
Videos
≈1,450
Links
≈2,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 01m
Average length
30m 46s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,227 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
842
68.6%
🙏
140
11.4%
👍
134
10.9%
👏
45
3.67%
😢
18
1.47%
👌
15
1.22%
🔥
14
1.14%
🥰
11
0.896%
😁
8
0.652%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ihr Lieben,
Eine kleine Ergänzung zu meinem Aufruf 🥺
ich wurde gefragt, ob auch eine direkte Überweisung möglich ist.
Da nicht jeder Paypal nutzt, stelle ich deshalb gerne meine IBAN zur Verfügung.
Aktuell habe ich noch einen Mietrückstand von 1.200 Euro und hänge beim Strom für die Monate Juni, Juli und jetzt im August (also drei Monate) hinten fest. Jeder Cent hilft mir dabei, diese großen Baustellen nach und n…
Eine kleine Bäckerei in Spanien hängt am Abend das unverkaufte Brot vor den Eingang, damit hungrige Menschen es einfach mitnehmen können – ohne zu fragen, ohne sich erklären zu müssen.
In einer ruhigen Straße wurde aus einer ganz normalen Schließroutine eine stille Geste der Menschlichkeit. Statt übrig gebliebenes Brot wegzuwerfen, legt der Bäcker es draußen in einfache Stoffbeutel. Kein großes Schild, keine Belehru…
❗️UPDATE: Der neue Job ist da – Doch die Spuren der langen Härtezeit bleiben spürbar ❗️
Ihr Lieben,
ich melde mich heute mit einem unglaublich dankbaren, aber auch schweren Herzen bei euch. ✨🙏🏻
Vor ein paar Wochen stand ich vor dem Nichts – und heute darf ich sagen: Das Licht am Ende des Tunnels war da. Ich habe den Sprung geschafft und arbeite seit dem 1. Juli in meinem neuen Job! Ich kann euch gar nicht sagen, wi…
Darum geht die Traurigkeit auch vorüber: das Neue in uns, das Hinzugekommene, ist in unser Herz eingetreten, ist in seine innerste Kammer gegangen und ist auch dort nicht mehr, – ist schon im Blut. Und wir erfahren nicht, was es war. Man könnte uns leicht glauben machen, es sei nichts geschehen, und doch haben wir uns verwandelt, wie ein Haus sich verwandelt, in welches ein Gast eingetreten ist. Wir können nicht sage…
Die Menschen haben nicht die Gewohnheit, sich in die Situation der anderen hineinzuversetzen, daher rühren so viele Fehlurteile, so viele Grausamkeiten und Ungerechtigkeiten. Man weiß nicht, in welchen Bedingungen sich eine Person befindet. Bevor man sie beschuldigt, soll man daher die Mühe nicht scheuen, sich wenigstens fünf Minuten lang an ihre Stelle zu versetzen. Dann würde man sich vielleicht darüber klar werden…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @parasign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 365,678 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Parasigner” (@parasign), 6,829 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parasign.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
