5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,473–7,476 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:44
7,473
-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:21
7,475
+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:00
7,474
-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:07
7,476
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:26
7,476
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 7,473 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,600
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
22 (9 July 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
25,671
Reactions total
508
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
129
Videos
28
Links
249
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
2m 13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
553 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
456
82.5%
👎
69
12.5%
👏
12
2.17%
🔥
6
1.08%
👌
5
0.904%
🖕
3
0.542%
😐
2
0.362%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ تفکر؛ چیزی فراتر از حل مسئله
(تکملهای بر این اشارهی کوتاه)
📕 یکی از فروکاهشهای مهمی که در تلقی معاصر ما از تفکر رخ داده و غلبهی تفکر فناورانه و مرجعیت چهرههای فناوری به آن دامن میزند، یکی گرفتنِ تفکر با حل مسئله است. گویی فکر کردن یعنی مسئلهای پیش روی ما باشد، آن را تحلیل کنیم، راهحلهای ممکن را بسنجیم و سرانجام به نتیجهای برسیم. این نوع تفکر البته ضروری و ارزشمند است؛ اما تمام تفکر نیست.
📕 مارتین هایدگر…
✅ اما به نظر من یکی از اصلیترین چیزهایی که باید یاد بگیریم این است که حرفهایی از این قبیل 👆 را زیادی جدی نگیریم. نگرشِ بیان شده در این جمله (که مشابهش در سخنان فناوریکاران فراوان دیده میشود) اگر مطلق فهمیده شود، بسیار مشکلساز است.
مهارت فکر کردن و توانایی حل مسئله برای موفقیت بیرونی بسیار مهم است، اما برای غنایافتن زندگی درونی کافی نیست. چیزهای دیگری هم لازماند: ازجمله فلسفهورزی و هنر.
🌐 کانال پارادوکس:
🆔 @pa…
✅ میدانید مشکل چیست؟ مشکل این نیست که نابودی نامحدودِ تهران یاشهرهای دیگر هزینهی معقولی برای سقوط جمهوری اسلامی نیست. اصلاً فرض کنید یک برگه بگذاریم جلویمان وبه مجید محمدی و همه حقوقبگیرهای موساد امضا بدهیم که حاضریم نصف بیشتر تهران و اصفهان و... ویران شود اما جمهوری اسلامی سقوط کند.
به نظرتان اگر نصف بیشتر تهران و... ویران شد ولی ج.ا سقوط نکرد، چه میکنند؟ فکرمیکنید معذرتخواهی میکنند یا از رو میروند؟ باز پررو…
✅ لذتِ اسیدپاشی به چهرهی عاشقان؛ دربارهی برخی واکنشها به پست جدید «نشر نی»، بخش دوم | بخش اول
خوب حالا «نتیجهی عملی» خرید حق نشر چه میشود؟ خیلی ساده: تا وقتی قانون خرید حق انتشار کتاب به صورت دقیق (و برای همهی ناشران) تدوین و اجرا نشود، این انتظار که ناشر حق انتشار کتاب را از ناشر خارجی بخرد عملاً به معنای تعطیلی نشر است. هیچ اغراقی در کار نیست: «تعطیلی نشر» و نه هیچ چیزی کمتر از آن.
5️⃣ وقتی کامنتهای زیر پس…
✅ لذتِ اسیدپاشی به چهرهی عاشقان؛ دربارهی برخی واکنشها به پست جدید «نشر نی»
✍🏻 کاوه خسروانی
1️⃣ چند سال است میخواهم دربارهی مشکلات، مافیابازیها، و فسادهای کُشندهی صنعت نشر در ایران بنویسم؛ اما همیشه آنقدر مسائل اورژانسی گریبان جامعه و کشور را گرفته بود که پرداختن به مسائل صنعت نشر یک جور فانتزیبازی به نظر میرسید. حالا هم وضعیت اورژانسیتر از همیشه است. بااینحال، تصمیم گرفتم حرف دلم را بزنم؛ شاید برای کسی …
✅ نوشتماشای تن و جان
🔺 نمایش دادنِ تن، هنری زنانه است. این را دیگر همه میدانند که زن به هزاران شیوه میتواند بدنش را بپوشاند که از برهنگی شهوتناکتر باشد. برهنگی شهوتانگیز است، اما پوشاندنِ هنرمندانه میتواند گیراترین شراب برای روح مرد باشد.
🔺 و او این هنر را داشت. تنش را «نشان» نمیداد، جرعهجرعه مینوشاند. و پیش از هر جرعه، به اندازهی چند جرعه تشنهام میکرد. لذت نوشتماشای یک گوشه از بدنش را تا نزدیک لبم می…
✅ حدس میزنید جملات زیر از کدام کتاب است؟
(راهنمایی: کتاب در دههی ۱۹۲۰ نوشته شده)
و نظرتان دربارهی این جملات چیست؟
▫️ به منظور ارزیابی درست نفوذ واقعاً خطرناک و زیانآوری که مطبوعات میتوانند اعمال کنند باید به بررسی این روش رسوای یهودی پرداخت که بهوسیلهی آن آدمهای شریف و صدیق به گند و کثافت و لجن کشیده میشدند و به شکل توهینها و افتراهای پست از صدها و صدها نقطه به طور همزمان، چنانکه گویی این همه را فرمولی ج…
✅ یعنی حالا کار به جایی رسیده که از بین غنینژاد و شریعتی هم باید یکی را انتخاب کرده برایش گریبان بدریم وگرنه «بیطرفِ بیشرف»ایم؟
قرار است دوگانگیها هر روز مضحکتر از دیروز بشوند؟
🌐 کانال پارادوکس:
🆔 @paradoxizer
✅ نمیدونم چه سرّیه که هروقت مطلبی دربارهی اینترنشنال مینویسم پیامهایی از این دست دریافت میکنم. بهخیال خودشون میخوان من رو بهخاطر علاقه به موضوع سکس و ترجمهی کتاب در این زمینه تحقیر کنند.
▫️ اما حواسشون نیست که اینجور واکنشها درواقع احتمال درگیری عمیق، وسواسی، و ترسخوردهی خودشون دربارهی سکس رو پیش میکشه؛ وگرنه چرا در قرن ۲۱ «پرداختن یک نویسنده یا مترجم به سکس» باید از نظر این افراد بهانهی حمله به او د…
✅ اخباری هست که قراره اینترنت بهزودی دوباره قطع بشه.
در شرایط فعلی که به امنیت پلتفرمهای داخلی اطمینانی نیست، من هیچ کس رو دعوت به استفاده از پلتفرمهای داخلی نمیکنم.
خودم هم بهاجبار (برای جابهجا کردن فایلهای کتاب در زمان جنگ) در «بله» اکانت ساختم.
اما اگر پیشاپیش در «بله» اکانت دارید، و ترجیح میدید در صورت قطع اینترنت، ارتباط نصفهونیمهای با هم داشته باشیم، در صورت تمایل، کانال من رو دنبال کنید:
http://ble.i…
✅ ضحاک رسانهای
چرا؟ واقعاً چرا برای اثبات اینکه ایراناینترنشنال رسانهای ضدایرانیست باید دلیل دیگری بیاوریم غیر از اینکه این ضحاک رسانهای عضو هیئت تحریریهی آن است؟
🌐 کانال پارادوکس:
🆔 @paradoxizer
👍43👎13
Signed Kaveh khosravani
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @paradoxizer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
در صورتی که نظام سیاسی مطلوب و مورداعتماد شما در کشور حکمفرما باشد، کدام گزینه را جهت ارتباط با هموطنانتان ترجیح میدهید؟
پلتفرمهای خارجی (اینستاگرام، تلگرام، ...)79%
پلتفرمهای داخلی24%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 89,079 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پارادوکس” (@paradoxizer), 7,473 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paradoxizer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
