Channel
@paradoks_media
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003553648953 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @paradoks_media |
| Created | 18 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/paradoks_media |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 65 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 66 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 66 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 18 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
61 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 25 | 41.0% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 13.1% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 13.1% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 11.5% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 4 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Falsafa nima yoki faylasuf kim? Falsafa — bu faqat kitoblar yoki murakkab nazariyalar emas. U insonning o‘ziga, dunyoga va haqiqatga bergan savollaridan boshlanadi. Suhbat davomida oddiy, lekin hammani qiziqtirgan savollarga murojaat etdik: — Faylasuf kim? — Falsafa nima uchun kerak? — Har bir inson aslida o‘zi bilmagan holda falsafa qiladimi? Kundalik hayotdagi qarorlarimiz, e’tiqodlarimiz va fikrlash uslubimiz o…
🔥5❤3👍2
Insoniylik paradoksi va mantiqning eng katta yolg‘oni haqida Hozir "KPI", samaradorlik va statistika asrida yashayapmiz. Bizga bolalikdan "Hissiyotga berilma, aql bilan ish tut" deb o‘rgatishadi. Go‘yoki mantiq bu har doim to‘g‘ri yo‘l, hissiyot esa xatolik. Lekin bu yerda yozilgan ethical dilemma bizni bu "haqiqat"ga shubha qilishga majbur qildi. Tasavvur qiling, yong‘in. Sizda tanlov bor, saratonni davolashga ya…
🔥3👍1
🇫🇷 Франция президенти Макрон душанба куни 15 ёшгача бўлган болаларга ижтимоий тармоқлардан фойдаланишни тақиқловчи қонун лойиҳасини киритмоқчи.
🔥1
Yangi ochilgan kanalda birdaniga yuqori faollik kuzatilgani va bir vaqtning o‘zida bir nechta qurilmadan kirilgani sabab akkaunt bloklandi. Yangi kanal ochildi va podkast qayta joylandi: https://youtu.be/vXF7UlMTJXI?si=P1lixSEMSxjZoYFh”
🔥3❤2👍1👎1🥰1
YouTube sahifamiz bog‘langan Google akkauntida muammo yuzaga keldi. Muammo bartaraf etilgach, podkastni yana tomosha qilishingiz mumkin bo‘ladi.
🤣8😭2🔥1
Podkastda tilga olingan ba'zi ilmiy tadqiqotlar manbasi va qisqacha tarjimasi bilan bu yerda tanishishingiz mumkin: https://substack.com/home/post/p-185211983 Telegram | Instagram | YouTube
🔥4
PODKAST CHIQDI Avval aytganimzidek, Paradoks Podkastning ilk sonida Farengeyt Press tomonidan nashr qilingan "Behalovat avlod" kitobi haqida suhbatlashdik. Nega Z avlodi ko‘proq xavotir va tushkunlikka tushmoqda? Ijtimoiy tarmoqlar erkinlikmi yoki qafas? O‘zbek jamiyati uchun Haidtning ogohlantirishlari qanchalik dolzarb? Umuman "Behalovat avlod" va telefonlar bizni qayerga yetaklamoqda? Iqtisodchilar Jamshid Musl…
🔥4❤2👍2
#1SON Biz oʻz qoʻlimiz bilan kasal avlod “yaratyapmiz”mi? Amerikalik ijtimoiy psixolog Jonatan Haidtning “Behalovat avlod” (The Anxious Generation) kitobida yozishicha biz bolalarni "o‘yinlarga asoslangan bolalik"dan "telefonga asoslangan bolalik"ka o‘tkazib, ularning ruhiyatiga katta zarba berdik. Lekin masalaning iqtisodiy va ijtimoiy tomonlari-chi? Ushbu muhim mavzuni iqtisodchilar Jamshid Muslimov va Behzod Al…
⚡3🔥3💯2💋1🤷♂1
Assalomu alaykum, loyihamiz hammamizga manfaatli va xayrli boʻlsin! Jamiyat va davlat uchun muhim masalalar xususida videomateriallar tayyorlashni niyat qildik. Qoʻllab-quvvatlaysiz degan umiddamiz! Telegram | Instagram | YouTube
🍌2❤1👍1🔥1
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @paradoks_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 624,527 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Paradoks Media” (@paradoks_media), 65 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paradoks_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.