Channel
@pantalone_r
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
59subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004433785988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pantalone_r |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 19 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pantalone_r |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:09 | 59 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 59 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 August 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,438 |
| Reactions total | 162 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
162 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5418327846378579065 | 46 | 28.4% | |
| custom 5465561998324439004 | 34 | 21.0% | |
| custom 5454373449604554694 | 30 | 18.5% | |
| custom 5438600534397323427 | 21 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5323734713557356332 | 18 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5438275886409358929 | 13 | 8.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pantalone_r. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 August 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩оскользнулся, стоило только выйти из Банка. Колено теперь неприятно ноет.
custom 53237347135573563327custom 54543734496045546945custom 54183278463785790652custom 54382758864093589291custom 54655619983244390041
Sticker, posted without a caption
🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ . 😀😀 ── 钱𝐕. ❛The 𝙛𝙤𝙪𝙧 most 𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴 words 𝐢𝐧 investing are: ' This time it's 𝙙𝙞𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙩 '. 🥹 За истекший период на счета БСК поступили добровольные финансовые вливания от заинтересованных лиц. 🥹🥹⭐ Звёздная реакция: @kawoof — 8. @.notuse — 5. @wersax_zx — 2. 🥹🥹⭐ Подарок Дельцу: @coddetty — 💐 🥹 Банк Северного Королевства благодарит за активное участие в программе поддержки Девятого Предвес
custom 54183278463785790655custom 54543734496045546944custom 54655619983244390044custom 53237347135573563322
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥹😀😀😀🥹Offi𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝙚𝙖𝙡. 🤩тро понедельника редко когда бывает приятным. Вот и сегодня тоже не исключение. 🤩ачало дня ознаменовалось отчётами по просроченным платежам. Работа с должниками всегда была делом трепетным, требующим усиленного контроля со стороны Банка, однако в этот раз, по неизвестным мне причинам, количество договоров с нарушением сроков погашения увеличилось на 7,2%. Задаюсь вопросом: «Для чего нужны пом…
custom 546556199832443900412custom 54543734496045546947custom 54183278463785790654custom 54386005343973234273custom 53237347135573563321
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥹😀😀😀🥹𝘓𝘦t'𝙨 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐤? Сотрудник приносит в кабинет Дельца письмо и оставляет его на столе. «как выглядит ваше поместье внутри? сильно старались над интерьером? насколько вы чувствуете себя комфортно в своем доме?» 🤩акое любопытство! Неужели у меня вырисовывается потенциальный гость? 🤩е думаю, что есть смысл перечислять абсолютно все аспекты, пересёкшиеся в моём пристанище. И, как бы мне ни хотелось, столь подробное опи…
custom 541832784637857906512custom 54543734496045546949custom 54655619983244390047custom 54386005343973234272custom 53237347135573563321custom 54382758864093589291
🤩ороз крепчает пуще прежнего. Едва ли добрался до поместья.
custom 54183278463785790656custom 53237347135573563324custom 54655619983244390044custom 54382758864093589292custom 54386005343973234272
Sticker, posted without a caption
🥹😀😀😀🥹𝘓𝘦t'𝙨 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐤? Сотрудник приносит в кабинет Дельца письмо и оставляет его на столе: «Господин Девятый, здравствуйте! Всегда интересовало: доверяете ли Вы людям?» 🤩опрос достаточно хороший. Но что-то мне подсказывает, что Вам, уважаемый аноним, ответ уже давно известен. 🤩оя персона приходится по душе далеко не каждому. Оно и не мудрено: медийность взимает свою плату без согласия лица. И моя участь здесь ничем не …
custom 54183278463785790658custom 54386005343973234275custom 54382758864093589294custom 54543734496045546942custom 54655619983244390041
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩ем же приходится любопытный читатель? Сбор информации производится исключительно статистики ради.
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 53237347135573563321custom 54183278463785790651custom 54382758864093589291custom 54386005343973234271custom 54543734496045546941custom 54655619983244390041
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pantalone_r. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤩ем же приходится любопытный читатель? Сбор информации производится исключительно статистики ради.
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,215,529 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙍𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙤𝙧” (@pantalone_r), 59 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pantalone_r.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.