Channel
@panoramica_libertad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,420subscribers
+31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001620305596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @panoramica_libertad |
| Created | 4 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/panoramica_libertad |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 2,420 | +20 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:16 | 2,400 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:24 | 2,395 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 2,393 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 2,390 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 2,391 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 2,387 | +9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 2,378 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 2,386 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 2,389 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 2,389 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
79 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 48.1% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 35.4% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 8.86% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.06% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Estimada resistencia, Muy buen día. Estaré 15 días desconectada de Telegram. Voy a estar con gente que adoro, a disfrutar del silencio, de las risas y de esos momentos tan indispensables para el corazón, la mente y la intuición. Mientras tanto, les cuento que ayer terminé de ver esta entrevista y me encantó. No conocía ni el canal de YouTube, ni a Rafael Mejía ni a Dan Melo y disfruté cada minuto de esta plática. …
❤11👍5🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
“Al perder la cordura, vuelves a tus sentidos” Alan Watts Bendita locura. ⇨ Link a vídeo fuente
❤2👍2👏1
¿Quién decide dentro de ti? | Milgram, Steiner y la autoridad interior Hay decisiones que parecen nuestras… hasta que observamos desde dónde nacieron. Quizá la autoridad más difícil de cuestionar no es la que está afuera, sino la que está dentro de nosotros. En este capítulo exploramos el experimento de Milgram, la mirada de Rudolf Steiner y la importancia de recuperar la autoridad interior. ⇨ Link a vídeo https…
❤1👏1
¿Cómo convences a la gente de cualquier cosa? Conferencia magistral de Ingeniera Lingüística por Carme Jiménez Huerta en la Asociación Plural 21, Barcelona. Filóloga especializada en lingüística, escritora e investigadora. ➨ Cómo, desde el discurso público, se utilizan los mecanismos del lenguaje para la fijación de creencias, la generación de respuestas emocionales y la manipulación social. 🔴 Si hace cinco años t…
❤4👏4👍1
LA FLOR QUE TODOS MASTICAMOS No se pregunten cuándo he decidido dejar de convencerles de mis puntos de vista. No declaro simpatía por ninguna deidad de los primates ni la virtud feroz de ser discreto si en ello están de más mis opiniones. No se pregunten más por mis ideas y déjeme pensar que me equivoco las veces que precisen mis amantes. El mundo es más hermoso que unos cuántos y pocos los poemas que lo entienden.…
❤3
Una pausa. ⇨ Link a vídeo fuente
❤4🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
James Corbett - Breve historia de la manipulación de la esperanza (Hopium) hopium = hope (esperanza) + opium (opio) Tras todas estas décadas y, en el caso de las democracias más antiguas, siglos de promesas políticas incumplidas, se podría pensar que el público ya se habría dado cuenta del juego. Pero, en todo caso, los acontecimientos recientes han revelado que la gente se está volviendo más adicta a esta manipula…
❤1
(Mini clip) "La revolución de la consciencia" Entrevista del periodista Derrick Broze al gran y legendario investigador David Icke. ➨ Link a entrevista completa en inglés vía The Conscious Resistance ➨ Link a este mini clip con subtítulos vía Odysee
〈3/3〉Los sentimientos tienen su lugar. Un instinto visceral fuerte puede protegernos o guiarnos hacia lo que nos parece correcto. Pero cuando se trata de decisiones de gran importancia —especialmente sobre dirigentes que dan forma a las leyes, las economías y las sociedades—, nos conviene profundizar más. Hay que analizar minuciosamente los antecedentes, las políticas y los resultados, además de la impresión que nos …
👍3
〈2/3〉¿Adivinas a quién voy a poner como ejemplo de este tipo de odio? A Donald J. Trump, por supuesto. Probablemente sea el hombre más odiado de la era moderna, solo por detrás de Adolf Hitler (podríamos citar a otros como Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot o Saddam Hussein, pero Trump es el más actual). ¿Se le ha preparado para que sea objeto de odio? Sin duda, aunque no del todo. A veces puede resultar bastante detestable, lo …
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @panoramica_libertad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Panorámica _ NoAlNoM_SíALaLibertad” (@panoramica_libertad), 2,420 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/panoramica_libertad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.