Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Разговоры в типографии (prepress, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop)

@pank_techer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,163subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001851003138
TypeChannel
Username@pank_techer
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pank_techer

Growth

1,1561,1631,159.57 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,156 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,159 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,163 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,155–1,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:481,163+4
11 Aug 2026, 02:481,159+3
8 Aug 2026, 11:301,156-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:341,158no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:281,158first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.6%
avg views ÷ 1,163 subscribers
Avg views / post
355
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (20 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,553
Reactions total157
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4629.3%
4025.5%
🤯3321.0%
👍1710.8%
👏74.46%
🤡53.18%
😱31.91%
👎21.27%
😁21.27%
❤‍🔥10.637%
🤬10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC119 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @creativehappensPhoto

Как правильно читать, чтобы понимать? Американский психолог Фрэнсис Робинсон в 1946 году разработал для своих студентов методику, чтобы они не просто читали текст, а действительно понимали и запоминали его. Она отлично работает и через 80 лет. Большинство из нас читают так, будто задача — дойти до последней страницы. Done! SQAR3 предлагает сначала понять, что именно ты ищешь, а уже потом читать. Шесть шагов: • S

5🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC205 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Обсуждали с креативным директором тонкости дизайна и вёрстки задней части упаковки. И он показал очень крутой кейс. https://vimeo.com/1203791570 Если хотите посмотреть смелые, необычные упаковки смотрите Азию) #PACKAGING

🔥52🤯2

4 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC322 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Есть ли обязательный минимальный кегль на упаковке? В ТР ТС 009/2011 и ГОСТ 32117-2013 нет требования «не менее 6 pt». Закон требует, чтобы информация была чёткой, читаемой, размещалась в удобном месте и сохранялась в течение срока использования продукта. Формально кегль 5 pt не запрещён, но после печати, лакирования, деформации этикетки или нанесения на флакон такой текст может стать нечитаемым. Рабочие рекомендац

🔥16🤯4

4 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC252 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В Битрексе есть ИИ, который анализирует созвоны. Сегодня бездушная машина меня похвалила))))) Антон Панкратов выступает в роли ментора, значительно повышая образовательный уровень команды за счет предоставления глубоких тематических знаний. Его подход к теме эргономики упаковки демонстрирует умение систематизировать сложные технические аспекты и представлять их в доступной, но профессиональной форме. Благодаря его у

🔥14👍2🤯21😁1

3 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC290 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Признак, что хорошо провёл выходные это когда перед планеркой в понедельник надо выпить кофе и вспомнить, а что делал в пятницу по работе))))

👍9👏76👎2🤡1😁1

29 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC506 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Простите за спам. Но это прямо «вьетнамский флешбек». https://youtube.com/shorts/ZbTaEjZjZnU?si=NxzCacx4NE1AxNXx P. S. Про лечить, нет ничего хуже, когда у тебя температура, а родители спорят о методе лечения)))) Семья врачей зло

5🤡2🤯1

29 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC469 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На правах НЕрекламы Вчера бывшая коллега написала, что у нее есть очень клевый бот. Почтал канал, посмотрел, вспомнил, как руками добавлял пантоны в растр и делал цветоделение под шелкографию руками. Теперь это можно делать автоматом. Проверайте, тестируйте. Приветствую участников группы! Хочу пригласить вас в свой канал, в котором я рассказываю про разработку бота по цветоделению Цветодел. Это новейшая и уникальная

🔥6🤯32🤡2😱2❤‍🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC369 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рассматриваю вариант оформления технологической карты на китайском языке — в связи с систематическими дефектами исполнения заказа. При проверке поступившего образца выявлены следующие технологические нарушения: некорректное нанесение 3D‑лака: неравномерный слой, отклонения от заданных параметров; на одной стороне — размытие, утрата засечек шрифта; на другой — непропечатка, участки с низкой адгезией (покрытие легко

6🤯3👍1🤬1

24 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC458 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пример того, что технологии и химическое производство не стоит на месте Всю жизнь меня учили, что клеевой клапан у нас без краски должен быть. Пришла новая развёртка с силой отдирал клапан, так как увидел, что там полная заливка. Вот так век живи, век учись.

13👍5🔥4😱1

20 Jul 2026, 16:55 UTC563 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему никому нельзя верить? Сегодня на работе открыл файл с новой развёрткой, посмотрел на него внимательно и пошел к менеджерам. В развёртке, что вы прислали боковинки равны, а одна должна быть меньше. Мне отвечают, по мимо файла, есть еще бумажный вариант. Взял упаковку, сложил руками. Результат на фото. Не понимаю куда смотрели наши любимые китайцы. Но невооружённым взглядом видно, что нет компенсации не на толщи

🤯18

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @pank_techer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,080,622 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Разговоры в типографии (prepress, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop)” (@pank_techer), 1,163 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pank_techer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.