Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pal o' Me Heart

Channel

Pal o' Me Heart

@palomeheart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,236subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001105932231
TypeChannel
Username@palomeheart
Created15 March 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/palomeheart

Growth

4,2344,2454,239.56 August 2026 — 4,245 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,245 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,242 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,234 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,236 subscribers4,2366 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,232–4,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:084,236+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:024,234-8
6 Aug 2026, 20:404,242-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:064,245no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:584,245first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 4,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (14 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,740
Reactions total557
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,007 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
59859.4%
👍17517.4%
🔥11911.8%
😁838.24%
🤔151.49%
😢90.894%
💔70.695%
💯10.099%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,060reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 21 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @palomeheart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC510 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот и рецензент Нью-Йоркера тоже пишет (посмотрев весь сериал, а не только первые две серии), что Мёрфи не справился с материалом романа и снял поверхностную кэмповую поделку в стиле Glee. Ryan Murphy claims that he’s always “worshipped” Ellis’s work, and, indeed, one can imagine why the creator of “Glee,” a show about the agonies and the ecstasies of high-school drama, might find the adolescent milieu of “The Shard

11👍4💯1

6 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC700 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если из романа, который работает на нескольких уровнях, среди которых сюжетный — не главный, оставить только сюжет, выйдет фигня нудная. Судя по первым двум сериям, экранизация не уловила магию романа. В какой-то степени фокус прозы Эллиса в том, чтобы позволить ей омывать себя — это настроение, вайб. Он, прежде всего, стилист, испытавший сильное влияние Джоан Дидион. Его истинный интерес — это слова, из которых скла

31👍10🔥6🤔2

31 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC≈1,100 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ожидаемо https://deadline.com/2026/07/a24-options-josh-silver-fruit-fly-tv-happyhead-1237005729/

18🔥8👍7

30 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,090 views39 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Unsayable: A Life in Writing Michael Cunningham, 2026, 304 pp ★★★☆☆ #palomebook Послушал новую книжку Каннингема — миленько, но не то чтобы вау. Вспоминает что-то из детства, что-то из начала писательской карьеры, добавляет цитаток из любимых авторов, дает эфемерные писательские советы в стиле если пишется — пиши, а если не пишется — ну не пиши, читай много, ищи свой голос и не хорони надежду. Не то чтобы какое-то о

26👍13

30 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC≈1,090 views80 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вышло исследование на основе двух опросов в США (2022 и 2025), как зумеры находят и читают книги. Главный вывод: молодые выбирают бумагу Несмотря на то что зумеры выросли со смартфонами и соцсетями, печатные книги остаются их любимым форматом. В 2025 году 65,2% читали бумажную книгу за последний год (против 50,4% в 2022) Медиана покупок печатных книг выросла со ~29 до 107 в год Зумеры обгоняют миллениалов по объёму

60👍12🔥7🤔1

28 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,020 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Also ganz kurz Объявили лонглист Букера-2026, и там три гейлита: John of John by Douglas Stuart — унылый типичный Дуглас Стюарт, тяжело, болотисто, удушливо, обволакивающе, пафосно. Героев кучка, все грустные, гордые и одинокие на вершине своих шотландских утёсов. Мне не зашло, но это типа одна из самых громких книг года so far и вполне себе претендент, но Стюарт уже брал Букера за «Шагги Бейна». All Them Dogs by D

33👍5

27 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,220 views112 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Fruit Fly Josh Silver, 2026, 476 pp ★★★★★ #palomebook Первый роман «для взрослых» специалиста в области психического здоровья и автора янгадалта Джоша Сильвера — это триллерная гей-версия Yellowface и критическая пародия на A Little Life. Два героя, два рассказчика. Мэллори несколько лет назад написала успешный дебютный роман про девочку-бунтарку, а сегодня увязла в писательском блоке и браке, который только снаруж

77🔥21👍12😢2

25 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC≈1,090 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

48👍5

25 Jul 2026, 17:30 UTC≈1,090 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Подписчица поделилась видео со встречи Каннингема с читателями пару дней назад. Такой он классный

👍1611

25 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,170 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Каннингем в мемуарах пишет историю своей фамилии, которую придумал дед — сын хорватских иммигрантов: I won’t discover, for decades—when my father goes on a genealogical kick—that the name Cunningham was invented by my father’s father, who, as a second-generation Croatian immigrant, felt that a name like Cunningham would get him further than his family name, Grgic, which, even amended into Grig, was not sufficiently

34🔥3

18 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈1,660 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Читаю сейчас сатирический роман Fruit Fly, by Josh Silver, там писателька с блоком хочет создать бестселлер и ищет советов на реддите. И этот отрывок просто очень смешной. „The perfect blend is gay AND sad“ The truth lies in Reddit. I open it. Hello! You’re probably here because you know you have the potential to write but you are stuck, sick of your current job and/or you want money. See. Reddit knows. It always

37😁34👍2

13 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,680 views36 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

100 Boyfriends Brontez Purnell, 2021, 192 pp ★★★★☆ #palomebook Победитель Lambda Literary Award Gay Fiction 2021. Сборник виньеток от художника, панк-рокера и писателя Бронтеза Пёрнелла складывается в восхитительно грубоватую, калейдоскопичную картину мира, где каждая история приносит новые разбитые сердца, а моменты близости часто оборачиваются одиночеством. Безымянный протагонист, в прошлом бездомный, «пресыщенный

26👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @palomeheart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 901,066 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pal o' Me Heart” (@palomeheart), 4,236 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/palomeheart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.