Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أﺣـفـاد الـمُـثـنـى🔻

Channel

أﺣـفـاد الـمُـثـنـى🔻

@palestine_lebanon1

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,990subscribers

-399 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002077219999
TypeChannel
Username@palestine_lebanon1
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/palestine_lebanon1

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Xinghhw/811765 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC@palestine_lebanon1/212461 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC1.004.8 hours
@Xinghhw/811856 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC@palestine_lebanon1/212470 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC1.0073 minutes
@Xinghhw/811977 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC@palestine_lebanon1/212487 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC1.004.3 hours
@Xinghhw/811987 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC@palestine_lebanon1/212488 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC1.003.3 hours
@Xinghhw/811997 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC@palestine_lebanon1/212489 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC1.003.1 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Xinghhw5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.3 hours@Xinghhw (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Xinghhw. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

9,99010,38910,189.57 August 2026 — 10,389 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,389 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,386 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,377 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,369 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,356 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,348 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,341 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,346 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,332 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,331 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,330 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,322 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,320 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,305 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,299 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,294 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,291 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,286 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,281 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,261 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,249 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,234 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,221 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,193 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,183 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,153 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,123 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,102 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,088 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,066 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,039 subscribers24 September 2026 — 9,990 subscribers7 August 202624 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 48 days, net -399. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,930–10,449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 20:169,990-49
18 Sept 2026, 16:5710,039-27
16 Sept 2026, 11:3610,066-22
14 Sept 2026, 15:3710,088-14
13 Sept 2026, 03:1510,102-21
11 Sept 2026, 06:2010,123-30
8 Sept 2026, 12:3810,153-30
5 Sept 2026, 03:4010,183-10
3 Sept 2026, 12:4010,193-28
2 Sept 2026, 03:0410,221-13
1 Sept 2026, 00:1610,234-15
30 Aug 2026, 22:3410,249-12
29 Aug 2026, 23:0710,261-20
28 Aug 2026, 23:4310,281-5
28 Aug 2026, 01:0410,286-5
27 Aug 2026, 02:0410,291-3
26 Aug 2026, 03:3610,294-5
25 Aug 2026, 01:4610,299-6
23 Aug 2026, 17:0510,305-15
21 Aug 2026, 23:5410,320first reading

Engagement

118 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.786%
avg views ÷ 9,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.5
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 118 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held118 (3 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total1,099
Reactions total104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
53m 01s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

909 reactions across 118 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥21824.0%
❤19421.3%
💔15316.8%
🫡9910.9%
👍889.68%
😍738.03%
🥰556.05%
🤬80.88%
🕊50.55%
👌40.44%
😡40.44%
🔥30.33%
👏20.22%
😁20.22%
😭10.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 909 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC7 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

فيديو || مقابلة سابقة مع الشهيد قيس البيطاوي من مخيم جنين .. ربنا يرحم روحك الطاهره يا بطل🫡

❤‍🔥2🥰1

29 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC24 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔴 تحذير أمني 👈 يحذر "أمن المقاومة" من التفاعل مع منشورات الاحتلال التي تتضمن أسماء أو صورًا لأشخاص يدّعي استهدافهم، سواء عبر تأكيد الخبر أو نفيه أو تصحيح الأسماء والمعلومات المتداولة. 👈 إن تداول مثل هذه التفاصيل قد يساهم، دون قصد، في كشف معلومات حساسة أو مساعدة الاحتلال في التحقق من معطياته. 👈 وعليه، يدعو "أمن المقاومة" الجميع إلى عدم التعليق على هذه المنشورات أو تصحيح ما يرد فيها، وعدم تداول أسماء أو صور مرتبطة ب…

❤2❤‍🔥1👍1

29 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC23 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

باسم المخيم لم أمت واسأل جنين #مخيم_جنين

❤2❤‍🔥1👍1

28 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC63 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔴في كلمات الشهداء بلسمٌ للروح.. وسرٌّ يُفيضُ بالسّكينة والسّلام.. 🔘 شهيد استهداف الاحتلال على غزتنا اليوم.. ارتقى هو وأرواح أخرى قد لا نعلمها ولا نعلم اسمها، لكن يكفيها أن الله يعلمها.. تقبّل الله شهداء.. .

🫡3👍2💔2🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC64 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔴🔘 الشهيد حسن زيدان الديري الذي ارتقى جراء استهداف دراجة هوائية قرب مسجد الاستجابة في حي الصبرة جنوب مدينة غزة

🫡3❤2💔2🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC55 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔻🇵🇸عضو المكتب السياسي لحركة حماس، د. باسم نعيم: 🔘في ذكرى استشهاده الأولى .. الشهيد القائد حازم نعيم، ‏رحمه الله وأسكنه فسيح جناته وألحقنا بهم شهداء مقبلين غير مدبرين. 🔘‏الحبيب أبو مصعب من أذكى واحب من أنجبت العائلة، ‏نال، وبجدارة، أعلى الدرجات في أعظم ملحمة حرية في العصر الحديث، ختم مسيرة طويلة من العمل والجهاد على طريق ذات الشوكة.

❤3🫡3💔2😍1

27 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC144 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔴مشاهد جديدة تُنشر للمرة الأولى قريبا" في ذكرى استشهاد الملثم .

🫡6❤2💔2🥰1😍1

27 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC146 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

لقاء مع الحبيبة.. ضمن برنامج غزة بودكاست.. 🔴🔴قريبــاً.. مع أم الملثم الشهيد حذيفة الكحلوت 💚☝

👍3❤‍🔥2💔2😍2

27 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC100 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔴🌟🌟 تصريح أمني.. بشأن تسليم عميل نفسه للأجهزة الأمنية 👈 سلّم أحد العملاء المرتبطين بالاحتلال نفسه للأجهزة الأمنية، بعد تأثره بما ورد في اعترافات العميل م.م، التي سبق أن نُشرت. 👈 ووفق ما سُمح بالكشف عنه، ارتبط العميل بمخابرات الاحتلال بعد قيامه بالتعليق على صفحة "المنسق" في موقع فيسبوك، حيث تلقّى عقب تعليقه مباشرة، اتصالًا من ضابط في مخابرات الاحتلال. 🤔سيتم الكشف عن مزيد من التفاصيل لاحقًا. 🏷️ الحارس.. توعية وتحص

❤‍🔥2🥰2🫡2👍1💔1

26 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC101 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

كتائب القسام تكشف عن مشاركة الشهيد المجاهد/ جهاد عماد المصري في كمين #كسر_السيف شمال قطاع غزة والذي نفذه مقاتلوا القسام من نقطة صفر في مدينة بيت حانون شمال قطاع غزة.

❤4❤‍🔥1💔1🫡1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC98 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

داخل معسكر العميل أشرف المنسي.. ناجون يكشفون تفاصيل مروعة روى ناجون تمكنوا من مغادرة المنطقة الواقعة شرقي “الخط الأصفر” شمالي قطاع غزة، والخاضعة لسيطرة مليشيا أشرف المنسي، تفاصيل عن ظروف قالوا إنها اتسمت بالخوف والفوضى، في ظل انتشار السلاح وتوترات متواصلة وصعوبة في مغادرة المنطقة. وتتعلق إحدى الشهادات بمدرسة كانت تقيم فيها عائلات، قبل أن تسيطر المجموعة على أجزاء منها وتحول عددًا من الفصول والمرافق إلى مقار لها. نا…

❤‍🔥2💔1🥰1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC92 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔴 طائرات الاحتلال تستهدف منزلًا سبق استهدافه في شارع البنا خلف مركز جباليا النزلة، شمالي قطاع غزة. ⬅️الاستهداف شمال غزة لفريق خيري واصابة لامرأة

💔3🤬2❤‍🔥1👍1🕊1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @palestine_lebanon1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الصحفية لمياء اياد
@Ira_qi2004 · 27,064
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 10 September 2026
ابو عبيدة - كتائب القسام [ᡕᠵ᠊ᡃ່࡚ࠢ࠘⸝່ࠡ᠊߯ᡁࠣ࠘᠊᠊ࠢ࠘气亠
@a_BBB7 · 62,764
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
توصيات FOREX FOX 🥇
@almuhallel4 · 24,462
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 September 2026
اقتباسات وعبارات قصيرة ❤️
@eqtpasathop · 55,542
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أﺣـفـاد الـمُـثـنـى🔻” (@palestine_lebanon1), 9,990 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/palestine_lebanon1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.