成都最近游戏场整体人比之前多许多。 市区有一家今天演员数量不错,不过颜值一般。 如果只看脸,我反而建议换地方。 今晚要去的可以直接问我。 V:padma123

Channel
帕吉哥的商k分享频道
@pajiktv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,833subscribers
-100 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002139424350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pajiktv |
| Description | 全部为本人去过的商k的分享 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pajiktv |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 22,833 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 22,841 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 22,848 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 22,852 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 22,858 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 22,857 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 22,859 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 22,860 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 22,870 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 22,871 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 22,877 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 22,884 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 22,893 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 22,891 | -14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 22,905 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 22,902 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 22,912 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:10 | 22,919 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 22,924 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 22,933 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.4%
- avg views ÷ 22,833 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,840
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (14 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 68,110 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 43
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 16s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
📍导航入口(点下面选) 成都真空游戏场 - https://t.me/pjktv/6 成都高颜值换装场 - https://t.me/pjktv/8 成都颜值场天花板- https://t.me/pjktv/16 重庆最大尺度游戏场 - https://t.me/pjktv/7 重庆高颜值游戏场 -https://t.me/pjktv/12 长沙游戏场商K- https://t.me/pjktv/13 上海游戏场商k- https://t.me/pjktv/15 西安颜值游戏场商k- https://t.me/pjktv/14
成都最新真空游戏场探店 雪茄先生 位置东门 最近去了几次,确定了质量肯定是过关的才给大家推荐,位置在东门,整体质量过关,也有酒水畅饮,用我的颜值观测法,妈咪普遍偏年轻,所以演员的颜值和年龄是过关的,没有污染卡池的怪兽。人均2500,也算是性价比比较高了 那边的订房经理V: CCDD2544 订房和售后也可以联系我:v:padma1233 游戏尺度肯定安排到位,费用帮大家能省则省,如果出现了商家这边的问题,我兜底负责到底。感谢大家这几年的支持。我永远站在玩家这边! 售后:游玩不开心,收费有问题,虚假宣传,联系我,消费全额退款,除演员小费)
最新重庆探店分享 颜值游戏场:四季 地点:观音桥 昨天去了原来的四季俱乐部,现在改成游戏场了,游戏尺度和氛围和其他游戏场差不多,但是最大优势就是颜值顶,很多老妹都是原来在颜值场上班,业务不好自降身价,改做游戏场了。 去的比较晚,但是还是看到了很多精品小妹。 总消费:单刷4200(不要妈咪可以控制在3000多) 总评:追求颜值,没去过的,无脑冲就完事了,我推荐的基本没问题。 联系方式:v :QiQiqiqi3214(77这个营销真的很不错是符合我价值观的) 也可以联系我:订房和售后:padma123
8月成渝商k推荐 8月份重庆推荐场子:四季和时光城这两家算是目前质量最高的游戏场,四季算是游戏场的质量天花板,去早点肯定能选到好的。 时光城还是游戏口碑好,基本0差评 两家都是有畅饮的,人均2500左右,单刷消费在3000左右。 8月成都推荐:总府,真空游戏场 去了几次消费亲民,最大的有点,妹子真的很听话,基本有想法都可以和演员私聊。 目前演员人数也算是成都最多的。 也是畅饮 颜值场西城 订房可以联系我:v:padma1233 游戏尺度肯定安排到位,费用帮大家能省则省,如果出现了商家这边的问题,我兜底负责到底。感谢大家这几年的支持。我永远站在玩家这边! 售后:游玩不开心,收费有问题,虚假宣传,联系我,消费全额退款,除演员小费)
8🈷️最新探店 成都真空游戏场 总府 很久没去成都了,冲着给大家寻找第一颜值高的场子任务,昨天8点30准时到了总府,只能说眼前一亮,确实质量很高,进来不是说每个都喜欢,起码老妹都是青春靓丽的感觉。不土,不老。没有那种来凑人数的怪兽,也基本没有00年前出生的了。 并且他这里的换装不是网上那种几十块钱,滥竽充数的,是比较有质量好看那种。 单刷一共消费3000 感觉值的! 订房可以联系我:v:padma1233 游戏尺度肯定安排到位,费用帮大家能省则省,如果出现了商家这边的问题,我兜底负责到底。感谢大家这几年的支持。我永远站在玩家这边! 售后:游玩不开心,收费有问题,虚假宣传,联系我,消费全额退款,除演员小费)
成都最新真空游戏场探店 雪茄先生 位置东门 最近去了几次,确定了质量肯定是过关的才给大家推荐,位置在东门,整体质量过关,也有酒水畅饮,用我的颜值观测法,妈咪普遍偏年轻,所以演员的颜值和年龄是过关的,没有污染卡池的怪兽。人均2500,也算是性价比比较高了 那边的订房经理V: CCDD2544 订房和售后也可以联系我:v:padma1233 游戏尺度肯定安排到位,费用帮大家能省则省,如果出现了商家这边的问题,我兜底负责到底。感谢大家这几年的支持。我永远站在玩家这边! 售后:游玩不开心,收费有问题,虚假宣传,联系我,消费全额退款,除演员小费)
https://youtu.be/krZP-Hpzz5U?si=8p_7I6khMbUyAOax
在这里回答一下大多数兄弟们比较关心的问题,带演员出去吃夜宵 首先目前成渝这一两年是很严的,99%的场子是不会,也绝对不敢安排这些东西的。赚这点皮肉生意的钱,首先是比不上酒水利润,再其次风险特别高,弄不好场子老板就要进去。 但是很多网上的营销,为了骗客户去,什么鬼话都说得出来,我这里有的,能给你安排吃夜宵的,都是为了把你骗过去消费,买完单,结完帐了,找个理由,演员就跑了,兄弟们花了大几千,想要的没得到,只能吃哑巴亏,受窝囊气。 还有一些妈咪,营销这些,会把话说得好听点,让你还有一个念想,说什么自己聊,有机会 这里我要给大家泼一盆冷水,很多演员,她就是只赚陪酒钱的,对自己还是有一定道德标准的,那这种怎么聊嘛?别人就是不赚这个钱的。你给再多,别人也不答应 因为现实就是演员,只分他不想赚这个钱和想赚这个钱两种,跟你聊不聊,怎么聊是一点关系都没有的。想赚这个钱的,你给她一个暗示,她就懂了,都不需要聊。 废话了一大堆,核心一句话就…
最新重庆探店分享 颜值游戏场:四季 地点:观音桥 昨天去了原来的四季俱乐部,现在改成游戏场了,游戏尺度和氛围和其他游戏场差不多,但是最大优势就是颜值顶,很多老妹都是原来在颜值场上班,业务不好自降身价,改做游戏场了。 去的比较晚,但是还是看到了很多精品小妹。 总消费:单刷4200(不要妈咪可以控制在3000多) 总评:追求颜值,没去过的,无脑冲就完事了,我推荐的基本没问题。 联系方式:v :QiQiqiqi3214(77这个营销真的很不错是符合我价值观的) 也可以联系我:订房和售后:padma123
8月成渝商k推荐 8月份重庆推荐场子:四季和时光城这两家算是目前质量最高的游戏场,四季算是游戏场的质量天花板,去早点肯定能选到好的。 时光城还是游戏口碑好,基本0差评 两家都是有畅饮的,人均2500左右,单刷消费在3000左右。 8月成都推荐:总府,真空游戏场 去了几次消费亲民,最大的有点,妹子真的很听话,基本有想法都可以和演员私聊。 目前演员人数也算是成都最多的。 也是畅饮 颜值场西城 订房可以联系我:v:padma1233 游戏尺度肯定安排到位,费用帮大家能省则省,如果出现了商家这边的问题,我兜底负责到底。感谢大家这几年的支持。我永远站在玩家这边! 售后:游玩不开心,收费有问题,虚假宣传,联系我,消费全额退款,除演员小费)
8月成渝商k推荐 8月份重庆推荐场子:四季和时光城这两家算是目前质量最高的游戏场,四季算是游戏场的质量天花板,去早点肯定能选到好的。 时光城还是游戏口碑好,基本0差评 两家都是有畅饮的,人均2500左右,单刷消费在3000左右。 8月成都推荐:总府,真空游戏场 去了几次消费亲民,最大的有点,妹子真的很听话,基本有想法都可以和演员私聊。 目前演员人数也算是成都最多的。 也是畅饮 颜值场西城 订房可以联系我:v:padma1233 游戏尺度肯定安排到位,费用帮大家能省则省,如果出现了商家这边的问题,我兜底负责到底。感谢大家这几年的支持。我永远站在玩家这边! 售后:游玩不开心,收费有问题,虚假宣传,联系我,消费全额退款,除演员小费)
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @pajiktv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 59,417 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“帕吉哥的商k分享频道” (@pajiktv), 22,833 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pajiktv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.