Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Paiseh Questions 🤫

Channel

Paiseh Questions 🤫

@paisehqs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,914subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001396707473
TypeChannel
Username@paisehqs
Description🏛Official Channel of Paiseh Question You Ask, I Post. 📤 Submit @PaisehQbot 💬 Discuss @PaisehQsChat 🔙 Previous: @PaisehQ (Discontinued) 📜 Using Paiseh Questions implies full T&Cs acceptance (avail @PaisehQbot)
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/paisehqs

Growth

32,91032,94032,9257 August 2026 — 32,940 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,939 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,933 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,931 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,927 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,928 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,924 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,913 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,910 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,914 subscribers32,9147 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,906–32,945 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:1432,914+4
16 Aug 2026, 05:1532,910-3
14 Aug 2026, 14:5732,913-11
13 Aug 2026, 03:3532,924-4
12 Aug 2026, 00:5232,928+1
10 Aug 2026, 21:3832,927-4
9 Aug 2026, 21:5232,931-2
8 Aug 2026, 20:2032,933-6
7 Aug 2026, 20:4432,939-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:0132,940first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.9%
avg views ÷ 32,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,550
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held51 (1 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total334,000
Reactions total2,144
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
422
Videos
2
Links
544

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,144 reactions across 46 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
46921.9%
🤣29113.6%
🤡22910.7%
🥱1748.12%
😱1557.23%
😭1486.90%
👎1426.62%
🔥1255.83%
😢1085.04%
💩381.77%
🖕371.73%
🗿341.59%
💔281.31%
🤨261.21%
😨241.12%
🦄221.03%
🤮200.933%
🍌160.746%
🥰90.42%
🌭80.373%
17 further kinds411.91%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 51 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @paisehqs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 51 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈2,390 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026

[Confession #C3322] I am 30F this year and I cannot help but feel that dating apps is a waste of time. I have been using it often since I last broke up 2 years ago and till now, I did not receive any good dates so far, where are all the good singaporean men at😩🥲? Jokes aside, I did consider finding a matchmaking agency to help bridge that gap. That was also terrible when I hear the cost is a few thousands just for a

🥱11👎63

17 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈3,470 views5 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

Those who are reaching your 30s, are you growing fatter and does that impact your confidence?

  1. M - Yes, Yes19%
  2. M - Yes, No7%
  3. M - No13%
  4. F - Yes, Yes12%
  5. F - Yes, No2%
  6. F - No3%
  7. NB - Yes, Yes0%
  8. NB - Yes, No0%
  9. NB - No0%
  10. KPO - Check results43%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😭41

17 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC≈4,240 views33 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

When you see couples that looks very gentle or demure, do you imagine how they are like when having sex, if they are as wild as you'd imagine?

  1. M - Yes18%
  2. M - No41%
  3. F - Yes9%
  4. F - No24%
  5. NB - Yes1%
  6. NB - No7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤮17🤨10🌭3🤣2😭1

16 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈5,110 views68 reactionsread 18 August 2026

[Confession #C3321] So its been 3-4 months that i have been broken up with by my ex, we were tgt for nearly 2 years. The most painful part about this entire situation was how she lied to me on the reason why she wanted to break up, so to give some background information she is studying while having her own homebased business which ofc takes up a lot of time however we still managed to meet up at least twice a week an

😢585🤡4🥱1

16 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈5,080 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

[Workers] Do you have an office confidante? Feeling stressed abt the multiple changes in my org and my existing confidante just laughs everything off or is too busy to care.

  1. M - Yes14%
  2. M - No17%
  3. F - Yes11%
  4. F - No12%
  5. NB - Yes0%
  6. NB - No1%
  7. KPO - Check Results45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

16 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC≈5,460 views170 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

This may be unpopular but do any of you secretly wished that the Japanese were successful in retaining Singapore as its territory? Such that we have nice food and culture.

  1. M - Yes3%
  2. M - No42%
  3. F - Yes1%
  4. F - No28%
  5. NB - Yes0%
  6. NB - No1%
  7. KPO - Check Results25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤡144👎12🤬5🤨4🖕3🤣1🤮1

15 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈5,950 views81 reactionsread 18 August 2026

[Confession #C3320] My parents go JB I thought whole day said me and bro settle dinner ourselves. Wanted to do my hobbies for fun. Gym cannot cos I scared crowded, Swim cannot cos rain, I alr sian of gaming liao. I decided to just experiment with eye makeup near 6-7pm cos bored la. I kena whacked by my mom before when I just practice eyeshadow near midnight who say the spirits come and snatch/freeze my face or what a

52🤣23🕊2🥱2🥰1😢1

15 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈5,960 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

Which is worse, knowing your partner was an FWB or that she has received money for sex?

  1. M - FWB10%
  2. M - Money for sex31%
  3. F - FWB6%
  4. F - Money for sex14%
  5. NB - FWB0%
  6. NB - Money for sex0%
  7. KPO - Check Results39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😭4🌭2

15 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC≈6,000 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

For smokers, do you prefer having a partner who also smokes (E.g smoke together)? For non-smokers, would you go for somebody who smokes?

  1. M, Smoker - Yes6%
  2. M, Smoker - No5%
  3. M, Non-smoker - Yes2%
  4. M, Non-smoker - No26%
  5. F, Smoker - Yes4%
  6. F, Smoker - No1%
  7. F, Non-smoker - Yes2%
  8. F, Non-smoker - No25%
  9. KPO - Check Results28%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6

14 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈6,000 views241 reactionsread 18 August 2026

[Confession #C3319] Sometimes when i’m on my period and i stain my panties, i like to wash it off at the sink and pretend i’m a murderer getting rid of evidence

🤣186😭2610🥰8👻2🔥2🦄2🆒2

14 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈6,050 views4 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🔥 AUGUST MID-MONTH VOUCHERS ARE BACK 🔥 Shopee giving 25% OFF again… finally something getting deducted besides your dignity 😮‍💨💸 👉 CLAIM THE VOUCHER HERE 💥 25% OFF 🛒 Min spend $25 💰 Cap $10 ⏰ DROP SCHEDULE 🔥 14 Aug: Claim now → use 8PM 🌙 14 Aug: Claim 8:30PM → use 12AM 🥵 15 Aug: Claim 12:30AM → use 8AM ☀️ 15 Aug: Claim 12PM → use 8PM 💦 16 Aug: Claim 12PM → use 8PM 🍑 17 Aug: Claim 12PM → use 8PM 🛒 Put everything

👎31

14 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈5,620 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

Can someone remain platonic friends with someone they had sex with? If they are in a friend group, do they think about it?

  1. M - Yes, No4%
  2. M - Yes, Yes16%
  3. M - No, Yes13%
  4. M - No, No2%
  5. F - Yes, No3%
  6. F - Yes, Yes6%
  7. F - No, Yes11%
  8. F - No, No3%
  9. KPO - Check Results43%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😨51

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @paisehqs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 32 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTCAnonymous Poll896 voters

Those who are reaching your 30s, are you growing fatter and does that impact your confidence?

  1. M - Yes, Yes19%
  2. M - Yes, No7%
  3. M - No13%
  4. F - Yes, Yes12%
  5. F - Yes, No2%
  6. F - No3%
  7. NB - Yes, Yes0%
  8. NB - Yes, No0%
  9. NB - No0%
  10. KPO - Check results43%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTCAnonymous Poll1,140 voters approx.

When you see couples that looks very gentle or demure, do you imagine how they are like when having sex, if they are as wild as you'd imagine?

  1. M - Yes18%
  2. M - No41%
  3. F - Yes9%
  4. F - No24%
  5. NB - Yes1%
  6. NB - No7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Poll661 voters

[Workers] Do you have an office confidante? Feeling stressed abt the multiple changes in my org and my existing confidante just laughs everything off or is too busy to care.

  1. M - Yes14%
  2. M - No17%
  3. F - Yes11%
  4. F - No12%
  5. NB - Yes0%
  6. NB - No1%
  7. KPO - Check Results45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTCAnonymous Poll1,670 voters approx.

This may be unpopular but do any of you secretly wished that the Japanese were successful in retaining Singapore as its territory? Such that we have nice food and culture.

  1. M - Yes3%
  2. M - No42%
  3. F - Yes1%
  4. F - No28%
  5. NB - Yes0%
  6. NB - No1%
  7. KPO - Check Results25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTCAnonymous Poll2,120 voters approx.

Which is worse, knowing your partner was an FWB or that she has received money for sex?

  1. M - FWB10%
  2. M - Money for sex31%
  3. F - FWB6%
  4. F - Money for sex14%
  5. NB - FWB0%
  6. NB - Money for sex0%
  7. KPO - Check Results39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTCAnonymous Poll1,750 voters approx.

For smokers, do you prefer having a partner who also smokes (E.g smoke together)? For non-smokers, would you go for somebody who smokes?

  1. M, Smoker - Yes6%
  2. M, Smoker - No5%
  3. M, Non-smoker - Yes2%
  4. M, Non-smoker - No26%
  5. F, Smoker - Yes4%
  6. F, Smoker - No1%
  7. F, Non-smoker - Yes2%
  8. F, Non-smoker - No25%
  9. KPO - Check Results28%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 491,573 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SG Concerts
@sgconcerts · 93,590
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 17 here — alongside 16 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Paiseh Questions 🤫” (@paisehqs), 32,914 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paisehqs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.