Video, posted without a caption
🍌16🔥10🤔2❤1

Channel
@pairsANN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,594subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001266953802 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pairsANN |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pairsANN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 4,594 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 4,598 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 4,601 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 4,608 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 4,616 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 4,621 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 4,621 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,037 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 327 | 31.5% | |
| 🔥 | 214 | 20.6% | |
| 🍌 | 193 | 18.6% | |
| 👍 | 149 | 14.4% | |
| 👏 | 51 | 4.92% | |
| 🙏 | 35 | 3.38% | |
| 🫡 | 24 | 2.31% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 0.868% | |
| 🌭 | 9 | 0.868% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.579% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.386% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 0.386% | |
| 🎄 | 3 | 0.289% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.289% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.193% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.193% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.096% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.096% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,037reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2025 to 11 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
🍌16🔥10🤔2❤1
BTC ↔ EVM swaps on PAIRS. Native BTC in, EVM assets out — non-custodial, on-chain, no wrapped BTC, no centralized bridge. Smart-routed execution with verifiable settlement on both sides. Demo below. Tech note + open test plan to follow. https://x.com/pairs_dex/status/1966259596294582349
❤20🍌9🔥9🎄2
Most DEXs avoid Bitcoin swaps, not because they don’t want to offer them, but because the infrastructure to make BTC ↔ EVM swaps trustless, efficient, and user-friendly just doesn’t exist at scale. Right now, moving between Bitcoin and Ethereum ecosystems almost always means: 🟢Going through a centralized exchange 🟢Wrapping BTC into a synthetic token that carries custodial risk 🟢Accepting slow, expensive, and multi-…
🔥22❤9🍌6👀2🫡1
Kelghe is behind the mic this week for the amazing Token for Your Thoughts podcast with the awesome @Lindsey___I (on X). On the podcast, Kelghe gets real about his crypto journey, the challenges and the motion behind Pairs, to blend CeFi and DeFi into one seamless platform, as well as… • Why licensing is crypto’s next unlock • How profit-sharing + usability could drive real adoption • The reality of running a tokeni…
❤30🍌8👍4🫡4
Community Update: Product Progress & Platform Milestones Wallet Addresses Now Published We’ve officially published the wallet addresses for all Pairs Team and Tokenomics allocations directly in the whitepaper. This gives everyone a clear view of how tokens are being managed, and ensures continued accountability as we move through future product phases. You’ll be able to track holdings, activity, and confirm that al…
🔥43🍌7❤6⚡4👏3
📣 We’ve officially listed all Pairs’ company token wallets in our whitepaper. Now anyone can track where $PAIRS assets are being held. ✅ No guesswork. Just on-chain clarity. Click here for the whitepaper >> 📄 https://docs.pairs.xyz/pairs-whitepaper/company-wallets
🔥34🍌6👌6🫡4❤3👍3🌭2
We’re informing you that our collaboration with Wallester has officially ended, and the card programme has now been closed. What this means for you: Your funds remain completely safe. They will be automatically transferred into your PAIRS app account. From there, you will be able to withdraw or exchange them within the app—either as fiat or in USDC. No action is needed on your part at this time. We will notify you…
👍73🍌20❤15🏆2
Hello Pairs Community, We’re back with this week’s roundup on everything happening across Pairs. The team has been working through several parallel efforts, from compliance processes to major product improvements, and we’re happy to share what’s underway. XP Farming System Live Last week, we officially published a full breakdown of the XP Farming system—outlining how points are earned, what trading activity counts…
❤44🔥10🍌5🦄2⚡1🌭1👍1
Been a bit quiet on here… We’ve had our heads down working through US licensing and unlocking compliance bottlenecks. It might not look like much from the outside, but nothing’s been abandoned. We’re fully focused on lining everything up properly so we can turn this ship around. We eat the short-term FUD for the long-term survival. 🛡️ -Kelghe https://x.com/kelghe/status/1932197377051607321
❤49🍌7🫡6👍4
The XP Farming documentation just dropped! Get the full breakdown of: - How you earn - Why it matters for profit sharing - How trading becomes a team sport Read it here > https://docs.pairs.xyz/pairs-whitepaper/overview-xp-farming-program
👍21🍌8🫡2❤1
As many of you know, last week we experienced a bot attack targeting campaign rewards, which unfortunately led to our main X account getting suspended. We’ve been actively communicating with several X employees and support teams, navigating what has turned into a lengthy process. While our top priority remains recovering our original account, we simply can’t afford to wait indefinitely—we know how critical regular c…
❤35🍌12
Thank you all for your continued support, and feedback. Despite recent challenges, our team's focus remains on delivering meaningful developments, maintaining transparency, and driving the Pairs ecosystem forward. We’ll continue keeping you closely informed. Thank you for being an integral part of the Pairs community. Best, The Pairs Team
❤57🔥10🍌7👏4⚡2🤔1🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pairsANN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@pairsANN named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pairs - Official Announcements” (@pairsANN), 4,594 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pairsANN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.