Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PAIN

@painonton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002914553868
TypeChannel
Username@painonton
Description$PAIN available on blum Chat: https://t.me/+x6Q9nPBJd1oyOWJi
Created29 October 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/painonton

Growth

1127 August 2026 — 112 subscribers9 August 2026 — 112 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111–113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:45112no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:42112first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 29 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3439.5%
🔥2326.7%
👍1517.4%
🐳910.5%
🙏44.65%
🤝11.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 30 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Oct 2025, 15:32 UTC268 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Welcome to the World of $PAIN. If Pavel Durov can't say it, the community will. Last time on TON... that was real $PAIN.

9🐳3🔥2

29 Oct 2025, 17:32 UTC713 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026

$PAIN #1 hot on Blum There are two kinds of pain in this world. The pain of having few $PAIN tokens, which are growing in value. The pain of watching them grow in value without you. Choose your pain wisely. Today, we have gained an alter ego, TON, which will remain with us forever.

21🔥7🐳4

29 Oct 2025, 16:02 UTC631 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Take part in the draw, win a gift, and don't be $PAIN

🔥8

29 Oct 2025, 14:09 UTC585 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Last stickers launch on @goodies How are you? I m $PAIN

👍84🙏4🤝1

29 Oct 2025, 13:08 UTC767 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

In his speech at Blockchain Life 2025, Pavel Durov said that they originally planned to call their AI Private Artificial Network (PAIN), but they didn't like the ticker. Recently, TON has been dying and feeling very bad, which matches this ticker. So, our team of enthusiasts decided to create a meme token and, accordingly, a meme public in the form of a blockchain alter ego. Recently, TON has been going through toug

👍7🔥6🐳2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @painonton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PAIN” (@painonton), 112 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/painonton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.