Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stickers by Paco

Channel

Stickers by Paco

@pacostickers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,436subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001419208027
TypeChannel
Username@pacostickers
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pacostickers

Growth

1,4331,4371,4356 August 2026 — 1,433 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,433 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,434 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,437 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,436 subscribers1,4366 August 202625 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 19 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,432–1,438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 05:541,436-1
22 Aug 2026, 06:481,437+3
15 Aug 2026, 18:481,434+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:451,433no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:371,433first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 June 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

24 Nov 2025, 17:17 UTC≈3,760 viewsread 6 August 2026

A wah named Archer. I shared a time-lapse process video on the first comment of the submission where I showed a picture with all the stickers from this pack, you can go and watch it there! @panda_paco

25 Sept 2025, 18:50 UTC≈4,570 viewsread 6 August 2026

Also Skylar's stickers pack. I shared a video of the process of the stickers pack of Zander & Skylar, you can see them on the first comment of the submission where I shared all the stickers of these two, on my main art channel: @panda_paco

18 Jul 2025, 17:16 UTC≈5,160 viewsread 6 August 2026

Ah yes, I had forgotten to share here, the stickers I did during the last auction for Zander Oro.

23 Aug 2024, 18:50 UTC≈8,430 viewsread 6 August 2026

5 new stickers for Izzy It's funny to see the whole pack, I've been doing this pack for around 10 years, and I can see the evolution of style through them, at least it is very noticeable to me.

10 Jul 2023, 19:37 UTC≈9,860 viewsread 6 August 2026

Some stickers I had done back at the beginning of the year that I had forgotten to show you all. These were for the awesome surmelle Pan (cake)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pacostickers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 564,344 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stickers by Paco” (@pacostickers), 1,436 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pacostickers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.