Перед червоними бу повинен був ставити, вот і вибило
😭8

Channel
@p4dre_fx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
65subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002281876099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @p4dre_fx |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/p4dre_fx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 65 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 66 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 67 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 67 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
71 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 33.8% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 26.8% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 21.1% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 14.1% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2025 to 2 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Перед червоними бу повинен був ставити, вот і вибило
😭8
Привіт банда ✌️🍀 Бодька запулив свій сервак, я теж там буду - залітаєм з двух ніг і показуєм як нада торгувати ✌️ https://discord.gg/XDuCeNWEVk
🔥8
Насправді все було чисто як день, Ілюша Мурзік (❤️) звернув мою увагу на сьогоднішню ситуацію по євро, і вона мені дуже сподобалась. Іноді дає, але в цілому додавати цей інструмент в основний пул активів поки не собираюсь 4h fvg trigger https://ru.tradingview.com/x/8CRmLJct 1h info tf https://ru.tradingview.com/x/QKZqn5X8 15m info tf https://ru.tradingview.com/x/q3CXwG6C 5m fvg test entry https://ru.tradingview.com/…
👍1
Гм✌️🍀 Розбір пози пізніше
🔥6👏1
Перезаходив на лайві вже
👍11
- акк, зацепило спредом
👍3😢2
Хау відкладається до кращих часів, гуд лак
❤5
Да, там не было фулл инверсии, не досмотрел 1d FVG test https://ru.tradingview.com/x/YLJiK2Z1 30m entry https://ru.tradingview.com/x/sfFUwuzj
Хоча XAU 4h - https://ru.tradingview.com/x/ZIV03jRL Нарешті закріпляємось за денним шортовим імбом, інвертуємо 4г імб теж - схиляюсь до шортів 1h - https://ru.tradingview.com/x/xJeO7ORW Так як на 4г не лишили поі, є сенс спуститися на тф нижче, і попробувати зацепити шорт від імба (хоча я не особо вірю що дадуть аж туди)
Гм гм ✌️🍀 В цілому від понеділка нічого і не очікувалось, на фоні того що відбувається у світі. Сухо по чартам - двостороння картина що по XAU, що по DAX, сьогодні залишуся в спостерігачах з надією отримати вихід хоча б в якусь із сторін Всім удачі і бережіться поспішних рішень - ситуація вкрай нестабільна 🫂
❤2
Qq ✌️🍀 https://ru.tradingview.com/x/Rtn2YbQo
😭2
Gm gm ✌️🍀 XAU Після тижневого/денного рейду бачимо відкат, із слабкими рухами вгору. Хочу бачити ресвіп в 4г імбалансі для подальшої роботи https://ru.tradingview.com/x/PyvRMJ5D DAX Ті ж самі яйця, тільки в профіль На фьючах був рейд тижневого/денного фрактала, на форекскомі ні. Впринципі реакції на нього немає тому хотів би попрацювати через ресвіп в 4г імбалансі https://ru.tradingview.com/x/Bbq5GaS1
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @p4dre_fx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“P4DRE” (@p4dre_fx), 65 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p4dre_fx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.