
Supergroup
P2B Official Community Chat
@p2pb2b_io
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry
18,108members
-131 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
952 online right now
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001256577644 |
|---|---|
| Type | Supergroup |
| Username | @p2pb2b_io |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/p2pb2b_io |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Members | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 18,108 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 18,112 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 18,123 | no change |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 18,123 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 18,139 | -21 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 18,160 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 18,169 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:43 | 18,184 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 18,196 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 18,207 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 18,220 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 18,238 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 18,239 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 17 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 18,010 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@p2b_exchange_channel · 9,6748 postsEarneo - Official Channel
@snapparazziICObounty · 9,2438 postsGamia Portal & Announcment Channel
@GamiaPortal · 4322 postsBen Diaz - Listing Manager
@BenDiazVf · 241 postCannfinity
@cannfinity · 521 postDaikicoinorg
@daikicoinorg · 5011 postLuxxcoin | Official Announcements
@LuxxcoinNews · 2,0051 postMetaCloud News
@MetaCloudNews · 1,3661 postMINTASSET ANNOUNCEMENT
@MintassetChannel · 2,2891 postPolarBearX Robotics
@pbxofficial · 1471 postREAL-TOK
@realtok_official · 381 postSafa Listing Solutions 🤝
@Safa_Solutions · 391 postVim Finance — Channel
@vimfinance_channel · 141 post英文步道群
@youliangqun2 · 11 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“P2B Official Community Chat” (@p2pb2b_io), 18,108 members as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p2pb2b_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.