Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for голос в сердце

Channel

голос в сердце

@ozbekcha_golc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

802subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 19 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004448114621
TypeChannel
Username@ozbekcha_golc
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 October 2026
Last confirmed live20 October 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ozbekcha_golc

Growth

77080278619 Oct 2026, 19:22 — 770 subscribers20 Oct 2026, 07:26 — 802 subscribers19 Oct 2026, 19:2220 Oct 2026, 07:26
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 765–807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Oct 2026, 07:26802+32
19 Oct 2026, 19:22770first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
236.3%
avg views ÷ 802 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held20 (9 October 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total37,906
Reactions total427
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Oct 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

427 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 543622863870810262610925.5%
custom 59697827192640695518419.7%
custom 54340305431654848978219.2%
custom 54361282953871636405613.1%
custom 59991942773499543735212.2%
custom 6017034974497085337255.85%
custom 5998956396291298661194.45%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 20 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ozbekcha_golc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 October 2026 to 19 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC687 views0 reactions7 Starsread 19 October 2026
Voice message

инсон факатгина озига мос инсон билан таскин топа олади, фикрларда, харакатда, максадларда ва бир бирини тушуна олишда.

18 Oct 2026, 15:41 UTC≈1,590 views0 reactions7 Starsread 19 October 2026
Voice message

Базан калбга хеч ким эмас, факат сукут ва Аллохнинг рахмати керак.

18 Oct 2026, 07:53 UTC≈1,700 views0 reactions8 Starsread 19 October 2026
Voice message

Нийяти болмаганнинг бахонаси бўлади дейишади. Келишни истаган одамнинг оёгини кессанг судралиб келади. Коришни истаган одамнинг козларини ойсанг хам хидингдан танийди. Қолгани эса - бахоналар, бахоналар…

17 Oct 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,550 views0 reactions2 Starsread 19 October 2026

Бугапи хичкачо унутма чунки сенга эришиш учун тахажжут окип колини дуога очкалар бор! ❤️

17 Oct 2026, 13:23 UTC≈1,560 views0 reactions3 Starsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

17 Oct 2026, 00:10 UTC≈1,430 views0 reactions4 Starsread 19 October 2026
Voice message

хар кандай йигит биринчи уринда хурмат хохлайди ва хурмат килган киз учун борини беради.

15 Oct 2026, 14:24 UTC≈1,630 views0 reactions1 Starread 19 October 2026
Voice message

хаётда энг мухими севги–ку.? – Йук хаётда энг мухими сенга керак булганга керак булишинг...

14 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC≈2,330 views32 reactions2 Starsread 19 October 2026
Voice message

севгида омадим чопмайди..

custom 596978271926406955118custom 59989563962912986616custom 59991942773499543734custom 60170349744970853374

14 Oct 2026, 14:42 UTC≈2,780 views45 reactions1 Starread 19 October 2026
Voice message

— эркакка бахтли булиш учун пул керак эмас, эркакка узи севган инсонларни бахтли килиш учун пул керак.

custom 596978271926406955123custom 599919427734995437312custom 60170349744970853377custom 59989563962912986613

13 Oct 2026, 23:40 UTC≈2,660 views30 reactions4 Starsread 19 October 2026
Video

– хасад уйогда турсин хавас хам килмисан ман бн бирга булсенг ишон.

custom 596978271926406955116custom 59991942773499543737custom 60170349744970853374custom 59989563962912986613

13 Oct 2026, 22:59 UTC≈2,450 views35 reactions2 Starsread 19 October 2026
Voice message

Менга гаплашмай қўйсам хотиржам юролмайдиган инсон керак. Масофа сақламайдиган, гурур орқасига беркинмайдиган ва ўзини бошқалардан кўрсатмайдиган, муаммо бўлса қочмайдиган, сўзда эмас амалларда бўладиган, хато қилсам тушунтирадиган, сукут ва жаҳл билан жазоламайдиган…

custom 543622863870810262616custom 599919427734995437310custom 59989563962912986616custom 60170349744970853373

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ozbekcha_golc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“голос в сердце” (@ozbekcha_golc), 802 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ozbekcha_golc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.