Channel
@oxtochi_frens
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
667subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002101340284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oxtochi_frens |
| Description | We here for Alphas |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oxtochi_frens |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 667 | no change |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 667 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
118 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 67.8% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2024 to 23 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/OxTochi/status/1914740929086337496?s=19 participate in this zero cost interaction looks good, but airdrop is not on me you mustn't use my link, check through the comment section, and support those who dropped theirs
👍6
costs nothing financially to get into Somnia Network yapstorm make high-quality yaps about somnia on X and get rewarded top 20 yappers shares $5k weekly top 100 yappers share 100k points weekly snapshots are taken weekly on friday by 9AM EDT this is probably one of the best things to do now that the market condition is horrible 3 in 1 offchain interaction here; kaito yap points, usdc, and somnia points
👍1🫡1
The alpha now is yap. spend time on X yapping about your favorite protocols. if you don't have an idea on what to yap about, use AI as a tool. Tool, not your replacement kek.
❤7
been a while now... voted for turtleclub on kaito connect https://x.com/OxTochi/status/1908574143638892647?s=19 Just added this to the retros I am interacting with atm.
❤6
Channel photo updated
https://x.com/OxTochi/status/1884171248696996330?s=19 OG labs, OG role
👍3
get these roles if you can. I think polymer is a big interop play, using riftlend gives you polymer exposure. Testnet soon. mainnet after that. points will be earned https://x.com/OxTochi/status/1883032052519624889?t=RHN_CoemyOt4QXYQ-IpK1Q&s=19
❤4👍1
quant wrong. I'm sorry 😞
🐳2👍1
join now for OG https://discord.gg/ChPQmvge
👍7❤4
perp on monad https://t.me/PerplTrade
❤1
quant says jan 15th or 21st for Berachain mainnet... I believe him
❤15🔥5
boost your on-chain footprint whenever you can participate in affordable-organic-campaigns that lets you interact with random fees Will cost you smol gas here and there but that's a good price to pay for a solid on-chain reputation
❤14
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @oxtochi_frens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OxTochi and Frens” (@oxtochi_frens), 667 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oxtochi_frens.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.