Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for :!! ๐จ๐ฐ๐ฅ'๐ฌ `` ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ :โœงห–ยฐเฟ

Channel

:!! ๐จ๐ฐ๐ฅ'๐ฌ `` ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ :โœงห–ยฐเฟ

@owlsinfoxd

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002885596475
TypeChannel
Username@owlsinfoxd
Description๐™„๐™ฃ ๐™ฉ๐™๐™ž๐™จ ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™›๐™ค ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™˜๐™–๐™ฃ ๐™›๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™™ ๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฉ ๐™จ๐™ค๐™ข๐™š ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™›๐™ค๐™ง๐™ข๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ค๐™ฃ ๐™–๐™—๐™ค๐™ช๐™ฉ ๐™ข๐™šยกยก
Created30 June 2025 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded13 November 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/owlsinfoxd

Growth

113 Nov 2026, 11:47 โ€” 1 subscribers13 Nov 2026, 12:22 โ€” 1 subscribers13 Nov 2026, 11:4713 Nov 2026, 12:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 12:221no change
13 Nov 2026, 11:471first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 30 June 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

205 reactions across 3 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค8742.4%
๐Ÿ“3517.1%
๐Ÿ‘พ2110.2%
๐Ÿ•Š2110.2%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ146.83%
๐Ÿ’‹83.90%
๐Ÿ’…62.93%
๐Ÿ’ฏ41.95%
๐Ÿ†31.46%
๐Ÿ”ฅ31.46%
๐Ÿ™20.976%
๐Ÿ’˜10.488%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 18 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Dec 2025, 16:42 UTCโ‰ˆ1,050 viewsread 13 November 2026
Poll

`` โŒฆ ๐Ž๐ฐ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ฌ . . . .

  1. [๐ŸŽ€] โ€” โค๏ธ43%
  2. [๐ŸŽ€] โ€” โค๏ธ57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jun 2025, 13:40 UTCโ‰ˆ2,250 views65 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Poll

ห—หห‹ โ™ก หŽหŠห— ๐–๐ก๐จ ๐š๐ฆ ๐ˆ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ?? โœจ

  1. ๐’‡๐’“๐’Š๐’†๐’๐’…10%
  2. ๐’„๐’-๐’˜๐’๐’“๐’Œ๐’†๐’“15%
  3. ๐’‚๐’„๐’’๐’–๐’‚๐’Š๐’๐’•๐’‚๐’๐’•2%
  4. ๐’“๐’‚๐’๐’…๐’๐’Ž ๐’‘๐’†๐’“๐’”๐’๐’68%
  5. ๐’‘๐’†๐’“๐’”๐’๐’ ๐’‡๐’“๐’๐’Ž ๐’š๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐’‘๐’‚๐’”๐’•4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

โค29๐Ÿ‘พ13๐Ÿ“11๐Ÿ•Š9๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿ’‹1

30 Jun 2025, 11:29 UTCโ‰ˆ2,190 views64 reactionsread 13 November 2026

โœงห–ยฐเฟ ๐‘ญ๐’‚๐’๐’…๐’๐’Ž๐’”:: ๐š“๐š“๐š‹๐šŠ, ๐šŒ๐š›๐š”, ๐šข๐š๐š๐š, 8:11, ๐šœ๐šŽ๐š”๐šŠ๐š’, ๐š–๐š’๐š•๐š๐š›๐šŠ๐š–, ๐š˜๐š”๐šŽ๐š๐š˜๐š–, ๐š–๐šŠ๐š๐š˜๐š”๐šŠ ๐š–๐šŠ๐š๐š’๐šŒ๐šŠ, ๐š›๐š’๐šŒ๐š” ๐šŠ๐š—๐š ๐š–๐š˜๐š›๐š๐šข, ๐šœ๐šŠ๐š’๐š‘๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ ๐šœ๐š๐šŠ๐š๐š’๐š˜๐š—, ๐š‹๐š›๐šŠ๐š ๐š• ๐šœ๐š๐šŠ๐š›๐šœ, ๐š๐šŠ๐š—๐š๐šŠ๐š—๐š›๐š˜๐š—๐š™๐šŠ, ๐š๐šŠ๐š—๐š๐šข'๐šœ ๐š ๐š˜๐š›๐š•๐š, ๐š‘๐š˜๐š๐š•๐š’๐š—๐šŽ ๐š–๐š’๐šŠ๐š–๐š’, ๐šœ๐š”8, ๐š‹๐š•๐šŠ๐šŒ๐š” ๐š‹๐šž๐š๐š•๐šŽ๐š›, ๐šœ๐š”๐šž๐š•๐š• ๐š๐š’๐š›๐š•๐šœ, ๐šŽ๐šŸ๐šŠ๐š—๐š๐šŽ๐š•๐š’๐š˜๐š—, ๐šœ๐š˜๐šž๐š๐š‘ ๐š™๐šŠ๐š›๐š”, ๐š‹๐šŽ๐šŠ๐šœ๐š๐šŠ๐š›๐šœ, ๐šŠ๐š•๐š’๐šŒ๐šŽ ๐š’๐š— ๐š‹๐š˜๐š›๐š๐šŽ๐š›๐š•๐šŠ๐š—๐š, ๐šœ๐šš๐šž๐š’๐š ๐š๐šŠ๐š–๐šŽ, ๐šœ๐š๐š›๐šŠ๐š—๐š๐šŽ๐š›๐šœ ๐š๐š›๐š˜๐š– ๐š‘๐šŽ๐š•๐š•, ๐š—๐š˜ ๐š’'๐š– ๐š—๐š˜๐š ๐šŠ ๐š‘๐šž๐š–๐šŠ๐š—, ๐šŒ๐š›๐šŽ๐šŽ๐š™, ๐šŠ๐š–๐šŠ๐šฃ๐š’๐š—๐š ๐š๐š’๐š๐š’๐š๐šŠ๐š• ๐šŒ๐š’๐š›๐šŒ๐šž๐šœ, ๐šŒ๐š•๐š˜๐šŒ๐š”๐š ๐š˜๐š›๐š” ๐š˜๐š›๐šŠ๐š—๐š๐šŽ. โœงห–ยฐเฟ ๐‘ด๐’–๐’”๐’Š๐’„:: ๐š“๐šŠ๐šŒ๐š” ๐šœ๐š๐šŠ๐šž๐š‹๐šŽ๐š›, ๐š•๐šŽ๐š–๐š˜๐š— ๐š๐šŽ๐š–๐š˜๐š— ๐šŠ๐š—๐š ๐š’ ๐šŠ๐š•๐šœ๐š˜ ๐š•๐š’๐š”๐šŽ ๐šŸ๐š˜๐šŒ๐šŠ๐š•๐š˜๐š’๐š๐šœ'โ€ฆ

โค31๐Ÿ“10๐Ÿ•Š9๐Ÿ‘พ5๐Ÿ’…5๐Ÿ’‹2๐Ÿ™2

30 Jun 2025, 10:50 UTCโ‰ˆ1,990 views76 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

โ€ขยฐโ€ขยฐ โœŽแฐโ”†๐‡๐ข!! ๐ˆ'๐ฆ ๐Ž๐ฐ๐ฅ (@purpleowl7777). ๐ˆ๐ญ'๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ. ๐’๐จ๐จ๐จ๐จ... ๐Ÿฆ‰ ๐๐ข๐œ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฆ๐ž๐ž๐ญ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ!! โ€ข ๐ŸŒŸ ; ๐ŸŒŸ [ ๐ŸŒŸ ] ; ๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜บ ๐˜ฑ๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฏ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ฏ๐˜ด โ€ข 13.12.2009 ; 16 ๐˜บ.๐˜ฐ. ; 161๐˜ค๐˜ฎ โ€ข ๐˜š๐˜ข๐˜จ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ถ๐˜ด ; 9๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜ค๐˜ข๐˜ฏ๐˜ข ; ๐˜๐˜•๐˜›๐˜— โ€ข ๐˜–๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ข , ๐˜œ๐˜ฌ๐˜ณ๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ ; ๐˜™๐˜ถ/๐˜œ๐˜ฌ๐˜ณ/๐˜Œ๐˜ฏ๐˜จ โœงห–ยฐเฟ ๐‘ฐ'๐’Ž ๐’Š๐’๐’•๐’†๐’“๐’†๐’”๐’•๐’†๐’… ๐’Š๐’:: ๐š๐š›๐šŠ๐š ๐š’๐š—๐š, ๐š–๐šŠ๐š”๐š’๐š—๐š ๐š๐šŠ๐š›๐š˜๐š ๐š™๐š›๐šŽ๐š๐š’๐šŒ๐š๐š’๐š˜๐š—๐šœ ๐šŠ๐š—๐š ๐š™๐š•๐šŠ๐šข๐š’๐š—๐š ๐š–๐š˜๐š‹๐š’๐š•๐šŽ ๐š๐šŠ๐š–๐šŽ๐šœ ๐šœ๐š˜๐š–๐šŽ๐š๐š’๐š–๐šŽ๐šœ. ยฐ @purpleowlsblog777 โ€” ๐˜ฃtw, ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ช๐˜ด ๐˜ฎ๐˜บ ๐˜ฐ๐˜ธ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฐ๐˜จ ๐˜ธโ€ฆ

โค27โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐Ÿ“14๐Ÿ’‹5๐Ÿ†3๐Ÿ‘พ3๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ•Š3

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @owlsinfoxd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Dec 2025, 16:42 UTCAnonymous Poll196 voters

`` โŒฆ ๐Ž๐ฐ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ฌ . . . .

  1. [๐ŸŽ€] โ€” โค๏ธ43%
  2. [๐ŸŽ€] โ€” โค๏ธ57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jun 2025, 13:40 UTCAnonymous Poll367 voters

ห—หห‹ โ™ก หŽหŠห— ๐–๐ก๐จ ๐š๐ฆ ๐ˆ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ?? โœจ

  1. ๐’‡๐’“๐’Š๐’†๐’๐’…10%
  2. ๐’„๐’-๐’˜๐’๐’“๐’Œ๐’†๐’“15%
  3. ๐’‚๐’„๐’’๐’–๐’‚๐’Š๐’๐’•๐’‚๐’๐’•2%
  4. ๐’“๐’‚๐’๐’…๐’๐’Ž ๐’‘๐’†๐’“๐’”๐’๐’68%
  5. ๐’‘๐’†๐’“๐’”๐’๐’ ๐’‡๐’“๐’๐’Ž ๐’š๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐’‘๐’‚๐’”๐’•4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2025 to 18 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ:!! ๐จ๐ฐ๐ฅ'๐ฌ `` ๐ข๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ :โœงห–ยฐเฟโ€ (@owlsinfoxd), 1 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/owlsinfoxd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.