Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for овощехранилище

Channel

овощехранилище

@ovoshehranilishe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,880subscribers

-71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650373022
TypeChannel
Username@ovoshehranilishe
Descriptionпо рекламе сюда @oxyvv цены @ovoshiprice
Created5 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ovoshehranilishe

Growth

19,88019,95119,915.57 August 2026 — 19,951 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,951 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,924 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,902 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,938 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,940 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,922 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,911 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,891 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,880 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,869–19,962 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:4819,880-11
14 Aug 2026, 13:4519,891-20
13 Aug 2026, 06:5819,911-11
12 Aug 2026, 08:4419,922-18
11 Aug 2026, 08:4319,940+2
10 Aug 2026, 08:5019,938+36
9 Aug 2026, 11:3219,902-22
8 Aug 2026, 10:1519,924-27
7 Aug 2026, 08:0019,951no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:4919,951first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 19,880 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,460
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held37 (12 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total156,080
Reactions total10,736
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,810
Videos
12
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

11,608 reactions across 37 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,25228.0%
🥰1,44212.4%
💘8016.90%
custom 53729794556585669505004.31%
custom 62445001018053798453903.36%
custom 53911846967448818543883.34%
custom 63122529102520685373472.99%
❤‍🔥3462.98%
custom 62468827220279332823302.84%
custom 62515533185737069963132.70%
custom 62466834956749403912942.53%
custom 60621679854920712992822.43%
custom 62467454591681202452332.01%
custom 62447596939237160522322.00%
custom 63120297351614329392322.00%
custom 62487846194459480022221.91%
custom 61339053124086692641831.58%
🎉1711.47%
🙏1711.47%
🔥1651.42%
19 further kinds1,31411.3%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,608reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 37 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ovoshehranilishe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,730 views302 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

абонент не абонент 🌟

158custom 625106786271520641186🥰31💘12🕊5🔥3😴3❤‍🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈2,680 views335 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 624688272202793328222968💘20😡8🔥4💋3🕊3

14 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,830 views513 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

ребят шинни вышел на прогулку в первый раз 😍😍😍

311custom 6134047222423095888102🥰71❤‍🔥7💘7💋5🍓4🐳3

14 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,280 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Угадайте язык, где вы можете собрать слово-паровоз 🚂 длиной в две строки для обозначения постановления о передаче права выдачи разрешений на осуществление сделок с земельными участками 💼 и постараться не задохнуться, пытаясь это произнести 👄. Тот самый, где „gift“ 🎁 не лучшая вещь, которую вы можете оставить под ёлкой 🎄, слово «девочка» 👱🏻‍♀️ среднего рода, а от возможности отделить приставку от корня будет зависеть

16custom 626461470066789831510🥰4🔥1🕊1

13 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC≈3,260 views352 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

ВСЕ кто сидит в говне - отмечайтесь в комментах, чтобы остальным было не так грустно 👍👍👍

🥰181custom 626461470066789831511038💘10❤‍🔥4💋3🍓2🤩2

13 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈1,870 views38 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @vita_schreider_deutschPhoto

Можно ли выучить язык в Duolingo? Я разобрала механику изучения языка в Duo с точки зрения лингвистики и того, как на самом деле происходит усвоение второго языка. Почему после сотен дней в приложении многие всё равно не могут говорить — и какие механизмы изучения языка здесь на самом деле не работают. Бегом смотреть https://youtu.be/fykJehIFEDw?si=XKqmvv7ilJTuHpMV

custom 6246683495674940391257🥰3❤‍🔥2🍓1

12 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈3,760 views295 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥155custom 62466834956749403915246💘29🔥6🥰5🍓2

12 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC≈1,910 views135 reactionsread 12 August 2026

шинни точно не гей 😁

🥰83custom 62466834956749403912512💔10💘5

12 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC≈1,880 views235 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dadaayaaPhoto

реакция моего кота на голую меня в душе 🛁

🙏124custom 62466834956749403917125❤‍🔥8💘5🔥1🕊1

11 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈3,780 views365 reactionsread 16 August 2026

родные кто был со мной на дне ПРИГОТОВЬТЕСЬ мы спускаемся еще ниже 😎

171custom 6246683495674940391121🤩38❤‍🔥16💔5💘5🔥4🥰4

11 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈4,160 views339 reactions5 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

срочна 😰

🥰186custom 626901292327266162696🤩2113🙏7💘5❤‍🔥4💋4

11 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,500 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gmo_memePhoto

Подборка мемов, для ГМО сообщества. У нас только ебейшие и почти все авторские мемы… 🌭 ГМО 😁

27custom 624878461944594800211💘5🤩4😡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @ovoshehranilishe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 499,069 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“овощехранилище” (@ovoshehranilishe), 19,880 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ovoshehranilishe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.