Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ово Керамика

Channel

Ово Керамика

@ovoceramics

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,912subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001709261009
TypeChannel
Username@ovoceramics
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ovoceramics

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,8867,9197,902.57 August 2026 — 7,886 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,886 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,890 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,886 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,888 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,889 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,893 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,902 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,911 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,907 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,919 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,912 subscribers7,9127 August 202612 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 36 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,881–7,924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 00:197,912-7
7 Sept 2026, 18:387,919+12
2 Sept 2026, 10:327,907-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:277,911+9
27 Aug 2026, 08:237,902+9
24 Aug 2026, 16:447,893+4
20 Aug 2026, 16:367,889+1
17 Aug 2026, 16:167,888+2
14 Aug 2026, 08:547,886-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:107,890+4
7 Aug 2026, 05:157,886no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:037,886first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,101 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,24454.7%
❤‍🔥73718.0%
🍓41710.2%
😍2455.97%
🌚1543.76%
👍1423.46%
💔1042.54%
521.27%
🌭60.146%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 13 we hold a reading for · 69%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ovoceramics. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,630 views213 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

А чего я, я чего глазурями торгую что ли. Это ващет мой личный бложек. Вот смотрите что есть.

🔥80🌚70❤‍🔥35😍17🍓11

18 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈3,110 views226 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

О, тут темка такая, что новые краски неплохо через сетку ложатся. Если кто практикует

😍89🔥80❤‍🔥33👍18🍓6

18 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈3,100 views309 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Смарите какова! Интересная глазурь, потому что она сама очень глянцевая, но на глине, на самом дне оставляет рисунок кисти. https://ovolavka.ru/effectcone6/tproduct/2391638401-341591576642-10088-eppldor

🔥174🍓58❤‍🔥36😍32💔7🌚2

17 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈3,710 views471 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Вот и готово! Подглазурные краски в тюбиках. 12 открытых цветов. Чем они молодцы: 1. Они высокопигментные, то есть их можно разбавить до жидкого, а яркость и укрывистость останется 2. Они не сборят даже в толстом слое 3. В нанесении как все у нас 4. Они в тюбиках! И наконец перестанут высыхать в баночках 5. Мы делали их весь год и вложили туда все что понимаем о глазурях и красках. Чем пришлось пожертвовать: 1. Цен

❤‍🔥280🔥125💔40😍13🍓8👍5

5 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈5,260 views326 reactions3 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Кароч спойлер

🍓137😍80🔥69❤‍🔥16👍12🌚10🌭2

4 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈5,060 views343 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Вот так лаборатория работает каждый день. Со стороны кажется что ничего не происходит, а внутри делищ полно

🔥217❤‍🔥82🍓31👍11🌚2

22 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC≈7,460 views363 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

А у нас идет традиционный летний съезд глазурных гиков. И я чот заметил, что керамисты опять уходят в секретики. Давайте в этом посте раскрывать чужие секреты. Например если кто-то чот делает и не рассказывает как, пишите, попробуем расколоть каждый орешек.

🔥243❤‍🔥67🍓27👍19🌚7

9 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC≈8,180 views273 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

Карооооч два товара есть. Новых. 1. Новая добавка под кисть. А чего она зачем. Свою добавку под кисть мы сделали лет пять назад. И с тех пор понимание о том как глазурь должна себя вести у нас эволюционировало, особенно с появлением супов. Ну вот собственно добавка номер 2 это то как мы сейчас понимаем комфорт в нанесении. Она вообще иначе сделана, попробуйте. Если вы согласитесь с нами, что она лучше, будем только

🔥181❤‍🔥52🍓22👍13😍5

8 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC≈5,870 views673 reactions4 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А мне бумажку выдали Так, что за луны я не понял

🔥439🍓66🌚61❤‍🔥3230👍29😍9🌭4

7 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC≈6,370 views334 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Никакой интриги кароч. Есть теперь цветные ангобы. Качества все как у мимиков, если кто распробовал. Только цветные. Это не линейка, это просто вот какие-то цвета прикольные. Мы собрали пигменты которые у нас накопились за шесть лет и вот выкатываем палитрочку. Что кончилось то кончилось. Какой-то может еще разок сможем замешать, а какие-то вообще никогда. Там пигменты очень разнообразные, какие-то немецкие, какие-т

🔥207❤‍🔥66💔40👍13🍓8

7 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC≈4,760 views180 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

А скоро выложим койчо нетипичное для нас.

🔥140❤‍🔥30🍓8🌚2

2 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC≈6,150 views229 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @anastasiaceramicaPhoto

Эти плитки - тесты модификатора OVO-6. Их у нас целая гора, и скоро мы всё-всё покажем. Как их понимать - в центре - глазурь сама по себе, слева - глазурь нанесена поверх модификатора, справа - модификатор нанесен поверх глазури. Видите, насколько отличается эффект, если менять местами верх и низ. Глина тура алта

🔥17522💔14❤‍🔥8👍7🍓3

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ovoceramics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ово Керамика” (@ovoceramics), 7,912 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ovoceramics.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.