Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы о работе со Светланой Савицкой

Channel

Отзывы о работе со Светланой Савицкой

@otzyvy_savitskaya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001829630676
TypeChannel
Username@otzyvy_savitskaya
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/otzyvy_savitskaya

Growth

222322.58 August 2026 — 23 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:1622-1
11 Aug 2026, 12:1823no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:4723first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 6 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 50s
Average length
4m 25s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
866.7%
👍216.7%
🔥216.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2024 to 24 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Feb 2025, 12:46 UTC494 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Отзывы с женской встречи в Москве 22.02.25 #отзывы #отзывыженскиепрактики

21 Feb 2025, 15:17 UTC461 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Отзыв Елизаветы о сеансе регрессии. #отзывы #отзыврегрессия

2🔥1

15 Nov 2024, 08:38 UTC103 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @sveta_savitskya

Аудио отзыв. Ольга обратилась ко мне в тот момент, когда тело не справлялось с жизненными обстоятельствами. Диагноз гипотиреоз и разбалансированное эмоциональное состояние. У нас был ченнелинг и несколько целительных сеансов, в котором Ольге помогали "выстроить физику". Но я прошу всех читающих и слушающих этот отзыв обратить внимание на то, что в ченнелинге Ольге были даны рекомендации, которым она следовала и ис

5 Nov 2024, 07:53 UTC89 viewsread 11 August 2026

#отзыв Дорогая Светлана! Я ходила с тобой в ченнелинг год назад, делала это впервые, волновалась, не знала чего ожидать. На самом деле это был сложный период в моей жизни, чтобы определиться что дальше делать и как я попала в эту точку. Мы действительно вышли на корневую причину в моей ситуации и проговорили варианты решения и после этого начались постепенные трансформации, которые продолжаются в течение года и сейча

2 Nov 2024, 09:50 UTC72 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Отзыв о сеансе регрессии. У Никиты оказалась очень древняя Душа. В сеансе, ему показали 9 прошлых жизней, которые были связаны с нынешними запросами. Благодарю за доверие и отзыв! 💚 #отзывы #отзыврегрессия

🔥1

2 Nov 2024, 09:50 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Не столь давно проходил сеанс регрессии у Светланы, откровенно признаться, сильно не на что не рассчитывал и толком ничего не ждал, да и собственно не знал чего ждать. Тем не менее результат меня просто поразил, Светлана, прекрасный проводник и чудесный человек которой помог мне заглянуть за границы моего привычного сознания и осмыслить всё в новом свете. Светлана помогла мне проработать все мои запросы на сеанс и да

👍2

1 Oct 2024, 08:02 UTC95 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ещё один прекрасный отзыв о моей работе. С Дарьей у нас было глубокое погружение, направленное на квантовый переход личности, минуя все (либо большую часть) программы, в том числе родовые. Работа с Дарьей шла в течение месяца, на протяжении которого ей Свыше были выданы практики работы с телом и с подсознанием, были ченнелинги и медитации, была глубокая поддержка в поле для проходивших трансформаций. ☀️💚 БЛАГОДАРЮ ☀

4

20 Jun 2024, 21:44 UTC119 viewsread 11 August 2026

Фрагменты сеанса ченнелинга #отзывы https://youtu.be/KbUsF_PIQbI?si=P7XVSwMh4C_jv-6k

25 May 2024, 16:40 UTC106 viewsread 11 August 2026

Отзыв Ирины о сеансе регрессии. #отзывы #отзывырегрессия

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @otzyvy_savitskaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы о работе со Светланой Савицкой” (@otzyvy_savitskaya), 22 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzyvy_savitskaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.