Channel
@otzovikot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001738075896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otzovikot |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 17 February 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otzovikot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 11 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 10 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Всем привет ! Много людей понаписовали , перед тем как отстраниться от работы все отзывы я проверила кому я не оплатила значит отзыв слетел ! Проект по написанию отзывов наданный момент закрыт! Я не занемаюсь написанием и раздачи отзывов ) прошу не раздавать мои номера НЕ КОМУ если вдруг снова я возобновлю раьоту,самых верных я вспомню и дам им знать !всем удачи !!
Signed Анастасия
МОШЕНИЦА! первое время оплачивает заказ,далее копит огромную не оплату и ПРОПАДАЕТ! человек старается внушить вам что он.серьезно относится у работе но нет, она относится серьезно лишь к тому что ей нужно вас обмануть и кинуть на деньги! Вот её данные +79654711775 @RepAd21 https://vk.com/aurika0711 https://vk.com/agencyrepad МЕНЯЕТ СВОЁ ИМЯ )ОДНАКО Я ВАМ ПОСОВЕТУЮ ВБИТЬ У СЕБЯ В ТЕЛЕФОН НОМЕР И ПУСТЬ ОН У ВАМ БУДЕТ, …
Signed Анастасия
Плачу за отзывы на яндексе, 50 р штука .
Signed Анастасия
Плачу за отзывы на плей маркете 20 Нужно ОЧЕНЬ МНОГО ОТЗЫВОВ
Signed Анастасия
https://taker.link/r/Pq2AxbEw9Q Зароботать легко можно с помощью.этого сайта ,тут поднять можно даже без вложений ,просто с бонусов Вывод на киви и дебетовые карты На киви со 150 р Переходи и заробатывай !!!
Signed Анастасия
Заказчик который платит за отзывы : Юла 100 р Цена заказчика: 300 р
Signed Анастасия
Все возможные зароботки❗🔴 pinned a photo
Инструкция содержащего отзыва на яндексе⛔⛔⛔ Продающий отзыв — полезный отзыв для клиента. В нем есть подробности и детали покупки, рассказ об особенностях и недостатках. 1.Описание услуги или товара. 2.Преимущества ,чем остались довольны . 3.Рекомендация другим покупателям . 4.Что заказывали и какой получили результат? 5.Для чего заказывали? 6.Решили свою задачу? 7.Что понравилось и не понравилось? 8.Кому рекомендую…
Signed Анастасия
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Анастасия
Мошенник. Даёт рекламу на различных каналов. А переходя предлагает за актив в личку. Приз. За приз нужно перевести деньги это бесконечно
Signed Анастасия
@ytwo_hh
Signed Анастасия
@ytwo_hh мошеница !если увижу что её кто нибудь снова сюда добавил,учтите ...забаню и вас
Signed Анастасия
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @otzovikot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@otzovikot named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Все возможные зароботки❗🔴✔️” (@otzovikot), 11 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzovikot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.