Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for отзывы

Channel

отзывы

@otziviiigivv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002783542261
TypeChannel
Username@otziviiigivv
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/otziviiigivv

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

46528 August 2026 — 4 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6 subscribers8 October 2026 — 5 subscribers28 August 20268 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 04:005-1
15 Sept 2026, 03:386+1
8 Sept 2026, 01:205+1
29 Aug 2026, 03:154no change
28 Aug 2026, 14:304first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC1 viewsread 28 August 2026

спасибо за расклад. очень приятная и смешная девочка, всё подробно было написано, советую!!

13 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC44 viewsread 28 August 2026

спасибо большое за расклад. было отлично. все было подробно и понятно. всем советую! и сама еще вернусь 🤍

25 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC88 viewsread 28 August 2026

Спасибо большое за расклад, все сделали качественно, было приятно работать с человеком, помогли разобраться с моим вопросом. Благодаря и советую💗

21 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC103 viewsread 28 August 2026

спасибо большое! очень многое откликнулось, теперь есть над чем подумать

18 Jul 2026, 08:53 UTC105 viewsread 28 August 2026

Спасибо большое за расклад ! Очень понравилось что вы вовлечены и видно желание действительно помочь в ситуации💘После многое прояснилось и я посмотрела на вопрос под другим углом Обязательно буду еще обращаться

17 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC93 viewsread 28 August 2026

СПАСИБО ВАМ БОЛЬШОЕ!!! Как я вас ценю и вашу работу ценю, вы прям мастер своего дела, благодарю вас еще раз!❤️❤️❤️

16 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC91 viewsread 28 August 2026

Как же вы прекрасно работаете!! Я вас так уважаю емае, вы оч хорошая и все быстро, четко без каких либо вопросов делаете, спасибо вам большое❤️

16 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC84 viewsread 28 August 2026

Спасибо большое за раскладик, мне понравился, он очень точный. В принципе услышала все ответы, которые хотела услышать. Думаю, что буду брать еще 🩷

15 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC81 viewsread 28 August 2026

Вау, это так подробно и понятно, я очень благодарна! Спасибо огромное🫂 есть над чем подумать

15 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC78 viewsread 28 August 2026

брала расклад, все четко и по делу, без обмана . надеюсь, проиграется и котя вернется домой!

11 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC87 viewsread 28 August 2026

вы меня очень сильно удивили тем, что расписали абсолютно все! И вы внедряетесь в проблему клиента, что меня тож порадовало, спасибо вам, что вы такая🙏🏿 Вы мне очень понравились, я еще вам напишу обязательно, будь у меня какие-то вопросы❤️

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @otziviiigivv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“отзывы” (@otziviiigivv), 5 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otziviiigivv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.