мы решили заключить ебейший союз с прекрасным чатом «𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐤𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝» будем надеяться на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 🤍 канал:: @salkaelson начало::25.06.2024
❤1

Channel
@ottersunions
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001801454701 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ottersunions |
| Created | 20 May 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ottersunions |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 6 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 6 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 20 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 16.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2023 to 25 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мы решили заключить ебейший союз с прекрасным чатом «𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐤𝐚𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝» будем надеяться на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 🤍 канал:: @salkaelson начало::25.06.2024
❤1
мы решили заключить ебейший союз с прекрасным чатом «𝐋𝐔𝐗 𝐁𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐍𝐊𝐈🎀» будем надеяться на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 🤍 канал:: @businkimh начало::12.06.2024
💘1
мы решили заключить ебейший союз с прекрасным чатом «𝐋𝐈𝐋𝐀𝐂 𝐅𝐀𝐌.» будем надеяться на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 🤍 канал:: @lilacsinfo начало::12.06.2024
мы решили заключить ебейший союз с прекрасным чатом «𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐍𝐘𝐖𝐈𝐒𝐄 𝐅𝐀𝐌.🤡🎈» будем надеяться на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 🤍 канал:: @pennywisesss начало:: 16.03.2024
мы решили заключить союз с прекрасным чатом «𝐑𝐈𝐁𝐁𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐅𝐀𝐌 🩻» будем надеятся на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 🤍 канал:: @ribbingfaminfo начало:: 19.02.2024
мы решили заключить союз с прекрасным чатом «𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐋𝐎𝐂𝐊𝐒 𝐀𝐂𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐘» будем надеятся на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 🤍 канал:: @warlocksxs начало:: 13.01.2024
🍓1
мы решили заключить союз с прекрасным чатом«𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐥 𝐆𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐚𝐦 ⚜️» будем надеятся на отличные дружеские отношения между каналом и чатом.🤍 канал:: @DanielGillieskath начало:: 12.11.2023.
⚡1💘1🕊1
🦦::𝐑𝐔𝐋𝐄𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐔𝐍𝐈𝐎𝐍. •Пᴏдᴨиᴄᴋᴀ 1×1. •В чиᴄᴛᴋᴀх учᴀᴄᴛʙуᴇʍ и ᴄᴀʍи ᴨᴩᴏʙᴏдиʍ. •Рᴨ будᴇᴛ ᴨᴩᴏʙᴏдиᴛьᴄя ᴨᴏ будняʍ,ᴄуббᴏᴛᴀ и ʙᴏᴄᴋᴩᴇᴄᴇньᴇ - ʙыхᴏдныᴇ. •Еᴄᴧи ᴄᴧᴇдящий ᴀдʍин ᴏᴛᴨиᴄᴀᴧᴄя бᴇɜ ᴨᴩичины - ᴩᴀɜᴩыʙ ᴄᴏюɜᴀ. •В ᴄᴄᴏᴩᴀх ʍы дᴇᴩжиʍ нᴇйᴛᴩᴀᴧиᴛᴇᴛ. •Вᴀжную инɸᴏᴩʍᴀцию ᴧучɯᴇ ᴨᴩиᴄыᴧᴀйᴛᴇ ʙ ᴧᴄ ᴀдʍину, чᴛᴏбы ᴛᴏчнᴏ ɜᴀʍᴇᴛиᴧи. •Нᴀɯи ᴩᴇᴀᴋция "😘", " 💘"- ᴏɜнᴀчᴀᴇᴛ, чᴛᴏ ʍы быᴧи нᴀ ʙᴀɯᴇʍ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴇ и ᴨᴩᴏяʙиᴧи ᴀᴋᴛиʙнᴏᴄᴛь…
мы решили заключить союз с прекрасным чатом «𝙣𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙞𝙙.𝙛𝙖𝙢🧜🏿♀ » будем надеятся на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 🤍 канал:: @Infonegroidfam начало:: 18.04.23
доброго вечера,выдрочки и гости этого канала!💗мы решили заключить союз с прекрасным чатом «𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐟𝐚𝐦🍒» будем надеяться на отличные дружеские отношения между чатами! 💗 канал- @cherriesfams начало::24.02.23
🤍это канал с союзами выдрочек.
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ottersunions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 589,162 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ottersunions named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🫂𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬.🦦” (@ottersunions), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ottersunions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.