Channel
@otherkinconf69
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,184subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001930367201 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otherkinconf69 |
| Created | 7 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otherkinconf69 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,184 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 1,183 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 1,185 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 1,185 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,696 |
| Reactions total | 174 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
174 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 72 | 41.4% | |
| custom 5266978056475525703 | 62 | 35.6% | |
| 🤗 | 23 | 13.2% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 2.30% | |
| custom 5267120232777926380 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| custom 5389115497465806269 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.15% | |
| custom 5271726245900468268 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| custom 5346088815742166098 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.575% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.575% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ДОБРОГО ВРЕМЕНИ СУТОК. Хочу сделать камингаут! Я факткин Уилл Вуда! Помимо этого, я Чарли Чаплин и Юджин Сагаз (ютубер). Быть факткином (именно по ощущениям, как минимум моим), странно, но так круто! Тут есть мои даблы? Был бы рад поздороваться / пообщаться со своими клонами 🥸 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк ◟₊˚
❤6custom 52669780564755257035custom 52671202327779263802🤗1custom 52717262459004682681
Здравствуйте!Я пришла за советом... Мне хочется камингаутнутся своим друзьям в плане своей нечеловечности,но я немного сомневаюсь...Они у меня в целом понимающие,но я всё равно боюсь,что на меня немного косо будут смотреть Я думала,что можно камингаутнутся тем,кому доверяю сильнее обычного,но это как-то не хорошо:кто-то будет знать а кто-то нет и в целом это может вызвать вопросы аля "ты мне не доверяешь?" Как вы счи…
❤6🤗2🍌1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
думаете у вас проблемы /ш, а у моих кинтипов, связанных с малопопулярной игрой, вообще нет никаких флагов. (Teablin Teashop ❤❤❤) я и фикшнкин&фиктив многих конкретных персонажей, и азерхартед самой игры, и концептхартед чайблин вида, и азерхартед чайблинов (не их концепт, а просто ко всем чайблинам). А Я САМ НЕ УМЕЮ ДЕЛАТЬ НОРМ ФЛАГИ. как жить дальше? /шутл 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк ◟₊˚
❤6😭2🤗1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
ТВ/КВ: ЯРКИЕ ЦВЕТА Ну и короночка: флаг фиктокинов Кулкида (НЕ ФОРСАКЕН) Сделан по просьбе моего друговнелюбовноголюбовника Неанон: Рен/Литл Фокс 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк #флаг #фикшн ◟₊˚
custom 52669780564755257039🤗1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
Флаг фиктокинов Комодо(вроде Майк его зовут) из ТПоФ Неанон: Рен/Литл Фокс 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк #флаг #фикшн ◟₊˚
custom 52669780564755257036🤗1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
Флаг фиктокинов Дракона(Джейса, вроде так зовут) из ТПоФ Неанон: Рен/Литл Фокс 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк #флаг #фикшн ◟₊˚
custom 52669780564755257034🤗1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
Флаг фиктокинов Мейсона из ТПоФ Неанон: Рен/Литл Фокс 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк #флаг #фикшн ◟₊˚
custom 52669780564755257035🤗1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
Флаг фиктокинов Селии из ТПоФ Неанон: Рен/Литл Фокс 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк #флаг #фикшн ◟₊˚
custom 52669780564755257034🤗1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
ПРОДОЛЖАЮ ЗАПУГИВАТЬ Флаг фиктокинов Дерека из ТПоФ Неанон: Рен/Литл Фокс 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк #флаг #фикшн ◟₊˚
custom 52669780564755257036🤗1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
Есть ли термин для тех у кого кинтип это придуманный им же вид? 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк #вопрос ◟₊˚
custom 52669780564755257038🤗2😱1
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
привет, азер кф!!! вчера я принял себя как лешего и также понял, что меня очень тянет к чему-то славянскому. так вот, стало интересно, есть ли тут кто-то из славянской мифологии, может быть какие-то русалки, домовые или ещё чего? буду рад узнать! неанон: тикки тоби 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк ◟₊˚
❤11custom 52669780564755257035🤗2custom 53891154974658062691
Здравствуйте,хотелось бы спросить у факткинов и фикшнкинов (так же это пишется?) именно что людей, у которых ирл противоположный пол человеку, которым себя идефицируете,ощущаете ли вы половую дисфорию от этого? Ну,тип,хотели бы вы стать противоположным полом что бы быть более схожим с ней/ним(!)? Извините за странный вопрос:( Анон 。︵⭒‿᧔Ѽ᧓‿⋆ #тейк #соцопрос ◟₊˚
❤7custom 52669780564755257036🤗2
Signed .ᐟ.˚ 𝟏𝑥𝟒 ⋮ ⌗𝖿ᥙᥣᥣ𝖿іᥴ،،｡𖦹°‧ 「 ✨🧩 」
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @otherkinconf69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 272,607 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OTHERKIN CONF!️✨🧩” (@otherkinconf69), 1,184 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otherkinconf69.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.