Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’•

Channel

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’•

@otggbabes

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

7,581subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001418564846
TypeChannel
Username@otggbabes
Created4 April 2021 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/otggbabes

Growth

7,5817,6327,606.57 August 2026 โ€” 7,632 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 7,632 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 7,631 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 7,624 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 7,605 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 7,581 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 7,573โ€“7,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 14:057,581-24
13 Aug 2026, 07:367,605-19
10 Aug 2026, 13:547,624-7
7 Aug 2026, 07:057,631-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:157,632no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:087,632first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
5.42%
avg views รท 7,581 subscribers
Avg views / post
411
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.27%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held38 (31 July 2026 โ€“ 12 August 2026)
Views total15,615
Reactions total510
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

510 reactions across 38 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ27153.1%
โค8416.5%
๐Ÿ˜479.22%
๐Ÿฅฐ479.22%
๐Ÿ“336.47%
๐Ÿ’˜173.33%
๐Ÿ’”112.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 510reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC32 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5โค1

12 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿฅฐ1

12 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC108 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โค4โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

11 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC198 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ“4๐Ÿ˜2

11 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC225 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ11๐Ÿ’˜4๐Ÿ’”1

11 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC259 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โค7โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ’”1

10 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC313 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5โค4๐Ÿ“1๐Ÿ˜1

10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC312 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ˜3๐Ÿ“1๐Ÿฅฐ1

10 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC316 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿฅฐ3โค2

9 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC343 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

๐Ÿ“7โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿฅฐ1

9 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC340 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿฅฐ3๐Ÿ˜3

9 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC337 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’• | Culture

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ7โค3๐Ÿ˜1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @otggbabes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐“‘๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ฎ๐“ผ ๐Ÿ’•โ€ (@otggbabes), 7,581 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otggbabes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.