21 Apr 2026, 06:26 UTC≈4,830 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
🎩
👍8❤6👌2
Channel
Oswell E. Spencer
@oswellspencer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,634subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003623761156 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oswellspencer |
| Created | 15 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oswellspencer |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:04 | 1,634 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,638 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 1,643 | -5 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 1,648 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 1,658 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 1,664 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 1,673 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 1,686 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 1,698 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 1,698 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 15 February 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
366 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 140 | 38.3% | |
| 👍 | 105 | 28.7% | |
| 🍓 | 47 | 12.8% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 11.5% | |
| 👌 | 32 | 8.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 11
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 5 we hold a reading for · 20%
- Most on one post
- 11
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oswellspencer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 February 2026 to 21 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
17 Mar 2026, 05:27 UTC≈6,180 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
We’ve been studying patterns of spread. Not in code. In nature. And we’ve come to a simple conclusion: Birds are the most efficient carriers. They move freely. They cross borders without friction. They connect distant points into a single network. Exactly what a viral system needs. So we decided to learn from them. Our next step is clear. The first project we are launching will replicate this behavior — a sys…
👍33❤18👌10
14 Mar 2026, 05:58 UTC≈5,870 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Every system has a heart. For us, that heart is hardware. Servers are not just machines running code. They are the core of our viral architecture. Every signal. Every connection. Every new “infection point” across chats and messengers flows through them. A game designed to spread like a virus cannot rely on ordinary infrastructure. It requires precision. Speed. And absolute reliability. That is why Umbrella Lab…
👍26❤17👌9
12 Mar 2026, 07:22 UTC≈5,320 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo
I woke up this morning with a thought. I think I finally figured out how to create the perfect virus game. A game that spreads not through advertising, but through people. A game that moves from chat to chat, from messenger to messenger. A game you can’t ignore — because your friends are already inside it. A truly viral architecture. No installation. No complicated onboarding. One click — and you’re in. Every pl…
👍38❤20👌11
9 Mar 2026, 10:46 UTC≈7,150 views168 reactions11 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo
For more than two years, the laboratory has remained silent. Behind closed doors, our researchers were working on something far beyond ordinary software. Not just code. Not just artificial intelligence. A new form of intelligence. An evolution. At Umbrella, we believe that progress belongs to those who dare to redesign the future itself. Today the laboratory doors begin to open. The first systems are coming on…
❤79🍓47🔥42
15 Feb 2026, 17:38 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @oswellspencer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 23,807 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Oswell E. Spencer” (@oswellspencer), 1,634 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oswellspencer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.